Advising a student with ADHD: brain and strategies
This is an email to a person, not an essay about a disorder. Getting the register right — accurate, non-patronising, addressed to John — is half of what is being assessed.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
An email to John, not an essay about ADHD
The format is the first thing to get right. You are writing to John, who asked for help, so the email has to be accurate about neurobiology while remaining readable by someone who is not a psychology major and is currently worried. That means explaining structures rather than naming them, avoiding deficit language where a mechanism will do, and never implying that effort is the missing ingredient. On the content: the prefrontal cortex supports working memory, planning, inhibition and sustained attention, and it is the region most consistently implicated. The basal ganglia and the striatum handle response inhibition and the timing of action. The anterior cingulate cortex is involved in error monitoring and conflict. The reticular activating system governs arousal. Dopamine and noradrenaline signalling is atypical, which is why stimulant medication helps and why John may find that interest, urgency and novelty change his capacity more than intention does.
The perception question is about how information gets in and what happens to it. Explain that sensory input is not filtered the same way, so a lecture competes with the corridor, the phone and his own train of thought, and that this is a gating problem rather than an interest problem. Working memory limits mean instructions heard once may not survive to the point of use, which is why writing them down matters more for him than for his classmates. Then the suggestions, which should be things he can act on this week and things you can offer: recorded lectures or a note-taking peer, front-of-room seating, assignments broken into dated sub-deadlines, external structure through calendars and alarms rather than internal reminders, and an offer to check in after the first assessment. Point him to disability services, since a professor cannot grant what the institution formalises, and close by making clear that the diagnosis explains a difficulty, not a ceiling.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Explain the neurobiology of ADHD accurately in non-technical language.
- 02Connect brain structures to the specific academic difficulties they produce.
- 03Describe attentional gating as a perceptual mechanism rather than a motivational failure.
- 04Recommend accommodations that are within a professor's power and name those that are not.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An email addressed to John in an appropriate register.
- 02Named brain structures and biopsychology factors, explained rather than listed.
- 03An account of how perception of external information is affected.
- 04Actionable suggestions for success in the class.
- 05A referral to disability services, and citations as required.
Brain structures, perception, then practical advice
Open as a reply to John
Acknowledge his email and set an accurate, non-patronising tone.
Brain structures and what they do
Explain prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, anterior cingulate and neurotransmitter signalling.
How information gets in
Describe attentional gating and working memory limits as perceptual mechanisms.
Practical suggestions
Give strategies he can adopt and supports you can provide.
Referral and closing
Direct him to disability services and close without implying a ceiling.
Sources on ADHD neurobiology and accommodations
Recommended databases
- NCBI Bookshelf (StatPearls)
- PubMed Central
- APA resources on ADHD
- Your institution's disability services pages
Search sequence
- 1.Confirm which brain regions are consistently implicated rather than relying on a single textbook diagram.
- 2.Search for evidence on academic accommodations that actually work, since the suggestions should be evidenced.
- 3.Read what your institution's disability services formally provide, so the referral is accurate.
- 4.Check current terminology — combined presentation rather than combined type — since the diagnosis language has changed.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Neurobiology, presentations and current terminology, which is the factual backbone of the email.
- 02
APA Dictionary of Psychology
American Psychological Association · 2024
Reference definitions for the attention, memory and motivation vocabulary used in the explanation.
- 03
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
American Psychological Association · 2017
Boundaries on what a professor should advise, which shapes the referral rather than diagnosis.
- 04
Problematic Smartphone Use Leads to Behavioral and Cognitive Self-Control Deficits
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2022
Evidence on attention and self-control in an applied setting, useful for the practical strategies.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Writing an essay about ADHD instead of an email to John.
- Naming brain regions without saying what each does for him in class.
- Framing ADHD as a motivation problem, which contradicts the neurobiology.
- Offering accommodations a professor cannot actually grant.
- Ending on a prognosis that reads as a ceiling rather than as a difficulty.
Submission checklist
- Is it written to John, in a register he could read?
- Does each brain structure connect to a concrete classroom effect?
- Have you explained perception and attentional gating?
- Are the suggestions things he could start this week?
- Have you pointed him to disability services?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.