BIO 220 GMO crops costs and benefits post: a guide
Listing costs and benefits is the easy half. The graded half is choosing one and defending it with a scientific rationale, which is a different kind of sentence.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 10, 2026
What does this GMO discussion require?
There are three demands here and only the first is straightforward. Identify some costs and benefits of GMO crops, decide which you find most important, and support that with a scientific rationale drawn from the course readings. Most posts do the first well, the second briefly, and the third not at all. The word rationale is doing specific work: it asks for a reason grounded in biology or in evidence, not for a preference. A sentence saying environmental risk matters most to me because I care about nature is a preference. A sentence saying gene flow matters most because the trait is heritable and, once it moves into a wild or weedy relative, cannot be recalled, is a rationale. Plan the post so that most of your words go to the third demand rather than to the list.
The benefits are well documented and worth stating precisely rather than generally. Modified crops have delivered higher yields, longer shelf life, reduced application of insecticide where the plant expresses its own insecticidal protein, tolerance of herbicide that changes how weeds are managed, improved drought and salinity tolerance, and enhanced nutritional content, which is what golden rice was engineered to provide. Each of those is a different mechanism and they do not all apply to the same crop, so name the crop alongside the benefit. A post that attributes every benefit to GMOs in general has not distinguished between an insect-resistant maize and a vitamin-enhanced rice, and the difference matters when you come to argue about risk. An insect-resistant crop and a herbicide-tolerant crop create entirely different selection pressures, on entirely different organisms, and a post that treats them as one technology cannot say anything useful about either.
The costs divide into three kinds and keeping them separate is what makes a post analytical. Ecological costs include gene flow into wild or conventional populations, effects on non-target insects, and the emergence of resistant weeds and insects under sustained selection pressure, which is straightforward evolutionary biology and is the cost with the strongest theoretical backing. Health costs are the ones the public worries about most and the ones with the least supporting evidence, principally allergenicity, which is a real concern in principle and is screened for before approval. Socioeconomic costs are the ones a biology course tends to skip, including seed cost and dependence for smallholding farmers, and market access where importing countries restrict modified crops. Naming all three kinds, and saying which kind your chosen cost belongs to, is what turns the list into an argument, because the three are not settled by the same sort of evidence and cannot be traded off against one another directly.
When you choose which matters most, resistance evolution is the strongest defensible answer and it is worth explaining why. It is not a hypothetical harm, it is a prediction of population genetics: any trait that kills most of a pest population while leaving survivors imposes selection, and the survivors' offspring inherit whatever allowed them to survive. That is why refuge planting requirements exist alongside insect-resistant crops, and why herbicide-resistant weeds have appeared where a single herbicide has been used repeatedly. Choosing this cost lets you demonstrate a concept from the course rather than reporting a controversy, which is precisely what a scientific rationale means. If you would rather argue that a benefit matters most, nutritional enhancement in populations with a documented deficiency is the equivalent choice, because the mechanism and the health outcome are both specifiable.
Avoid two failure modes that are common on this topic. The first is treating the question as a referendum, where the post becomes a verdict on whether GMOs are good or bad; the prompt asks you to weigh specific costs and benefits, which is a narrower and more answerable question. The second is importing claims from advocacy material on either side. Industry material understates ecological risk and advocacy material overstates health risk, and peer-reviewed reviews generally find that documented benefits outweigh documented harms while noting that long-term ecological effects are harder to study than health effects. Saying that, and citing it, is more persuasive than picking a side and defending it, and it also protects you from the obvious counter-argument, which is that you read one source and adopted its conclusion. The prompt asks what you find most important, not what the literature has concluded, so your job is to weigh rather than to report.
On mechanics, the prompt tells you where the rationale should come from: concepts you learned from the readings. That is an instruction to connect your answer to course content, so name the concept you are using, whether it is selection pressure, gene flow, or trophic effects, and use the vocabulary the readings use. Check your course's minimum length and source requirements for an initial post. And if replies to peers are graded, the most substantive reply here is to take a classmate's chosen cost or benefit and ask what evidence would settle it, since that moves the thread from opinion toward method, and it is a question that can be answered rather than merely agreed with. Asking what evidence would settle a disagreement is also the most transferable habit this course can leave you with.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Distinguish a scientific rationale from a stated preference.
- 02Attach each benefit to the specific crop and mechanism that delivers it.
- 03Separate ecological, health and socioeconomic costs.
- 04Argue resistance evolution from selection rather than from concern.
- 05Avoid turning the prompt into a verdict on the technology.
- 06Name the course concept the rationale draws on.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation Hi Class, Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts. Contact me if you have any questions. Important information on Writing a Discussion Question Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references) There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article. Include in-text citations in your response Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information Follow APA-7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week. Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references) Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count. Follow APA 7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points. Here are some helpful links Student paper example Citing Sources The Writing Center is a great resource Welcome to class Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to. I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you. Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted. If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations. Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements. Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week. I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course! BIO 220 Grand Canyon Week 4 Discussion 2 Given what you know about genetically modified organisms (GMOs) identify some of the costs and benefits associated with GMO crops Exit Grid View List View Excellent Point range: 90–100 Good Point range: 80–89 Fair Point range: 70–79 Poor Point range: 0–69 In 4 or 5 sentences, describe the anatomy of the basic unit of the nervous sytem, the neuron. Include each part of the neuron and a general overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse. Be specific and provide examples. 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly describes in detail the anatomy of the neuron. The response accurately and clearly describes in detail each part of the neuron, and it includes a detailed explanation of the general overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse. Examples fully support the response provided. 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately describes the anatomy of the neuron. The response accurately describes each part of the neuron, and it includes a general overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse. Examples support the response provided. 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response provides an inaccurate or vague description of the anatomy of the neuron. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes each part of the neuron, and it includes an inaccurate or vague overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse. Examples vaguely support the response provided. 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response provides an inaccurate or incomplete description of the anatomy of the neuron, or is missing. The response inaccurately or incompletely describes each part of the neuron, and it includes an inaccurate or vague overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse, or is missing. Examples do not support the response provided, or is missing. Answer the following (listing is acceptable for these questions): a. What are the major components that make up the subcortical structures? b. Which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction? c. What are the two key neurotransmitters located in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control? 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly details the major components that make up the subcortical structures. The response accurately and clearly details which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction. The response accurately and clearly identifies the two neurotransmitters located in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control. 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately identifies the major components that make up the subcortical structures. The response accurately identifies which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction. The response accurately identifies the two neurotransmitters located in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control. 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately identifies the major components that make up the subcortical structures. The response inaccurately identifies which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction. The response inaccurately identifies two neurotransmitters located in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control. 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and incompletely identifies the major components that make up the subcortical structures, or is missing. The response inaccurately and incompletely identifies which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction, or is missing. The response inaccurately and incompletely identifies two neurotransmitters in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control, or is missing. In 3 or 4 sentences, explain how glia cells function in the central nervous system. Be specific and provide examples. 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how glia cells function in the central nervous system. Examples fully support the response provided. 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains how glia cells function in the central nervous system. Examples support the response provided. 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how glia cells function in the central nervous system. Examples inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how glia cells function in the central nervous system, or is missing. Examples do not support the response provided, or is missing. The synapse is an area between two neurons that allows for chemical communication. In 3 or 4 sentences, explain what part of the neurons are communicating with each other and in which direction does this communication occur? Be specific. 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the part of the neurons that communicate with each other and the direction in which this communication occurs. 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains the part of the neurons that communicate with each other and the direction in which this communication occurs. 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the part of the neurons that communicate with each other and the direction in which this communication occurs. 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the part of the neurons that communicate with each other and the direction in which this communication occurs, or is missing. In 3–5 sentences, explain the concept of “neuroplasticity.” Be specific and provide examples. 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the concept of neuroplasticity. Examples provided fully support the response provided. 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains the concept of neuroplasticity. Examples provided support the response provided. 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of neuroplasticity. Examples inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of neuroplasticity, or is missing. Examples do not support the response provided, or is missing. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, 5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Total Points: 75
Three demands and where the marks sit
- 01Costs associated with GMO crops.
- 02Benefits associated with GMO crops.
- 03A statement of which you find most important, and why.
- 04A scientific rationale based on concepts from the readings.
- 05Any sources your course requires for an initial post.
Benefits, costs by kind, the one that matters most
The benefits, by mechanism
Name specific benefits with the crop and the modification that produces each.
The costs, by kind
Separate ecological, health and socioeconomic costs and note where the evidence is strong and where it is not.
The one that matters most
Choose one and defend it from a course concept, such as selection pressure or gene flow.
Where the evidence stands
Note what peer-reviewed reviews conclude and where the remaining uncertainty lies.
Where the GM crop evidence sits
Recommended databases
- Your course readings, which the prompt names as the source of the rationale
- PubMed Central for peer-reviewed reviews of GM crop benefits and risks
- Regulatory risk assessments, for what is actually screened before approval
- Agricultural extension services, for documented resistance cases in the field
Search sequence
- 1.List the benefits and costs first, then decide which one you can defend with a mechanism.
- 2.Find a review that separates documented harms from hypothesised ones.
- 3.Look up a specific case of resistance evolving under a modified crop, for evidence rather than theory.
- 4.Check which concept from your readings your rationale is using, and use that vocabulary.
- 5.Note the source type of every claim you carry into the post.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
One risk assessment for genetically modified plants
PubMed Central · 2025
What is actually assessed before a modified plant is approved, which lets you distinguish a screened risk from an unexamined one.
- 02
Genetically Modified Foods and Social Concerns
Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology · 2013
Covers allergenicity, antibiotic resistance markers and environmental concerns in one place. Useful for the costs section, and honest about which concerns are evidenced.
- 03
Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops
PubMed Central · 2025
Explains why sources on this topic disagree systematically, which is the point to make instead of picking a side.
- 04
Recombinant DNA Technology
National Human Genome Research Institute · 2025
A precise definition of the underlying technique, so the mechanism half of your rationale is stated accurately.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing costs and benefits and stopping before the rationale.
- Giving a preference where a rationale was asked for.
- Attributing all benefits to GMOs in general rather than to specific crops.
- Blending ecological, health and socioeconomic costs into one list.
- Answering as though the question were whether GMOs are good or bad.
- Drawing claims from advocacy or industry material without noting the source type.
- Never naming a concept from the readings, which the prompt explicitly requires.
Submission checklist
- At least three benefits and three costs are named.
- Each benefit is tied to a crop and a mechanism.
- Costs are grouped by kind.
- One cost or benefit is chosen as most important.
- The reason given is biological or evidential, not preferential.
- A named course concept underpins the rationale.
- Source types are acknowledged where claims are contested.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.