Medical terminology DIS 11-15 discussion guide
Five textbook stories, one entry each, your choice of topic per story — which makes topic selection the real skill: across Mr. Davis's sight loss, an impetigo visit, Jacob's insulin lapses, contraception choices, and a diverted MS Contin script, pick the topic per story you can answer with terminology and substance.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 11, 2026
How should you pick your topic in each DIS story?
The instruction repeated five times — 'submit 1 entry in response to the Topics listed; you may answer a topic or reply to another student's answer' — is a choice architecture, and using it deliberately is what separates strong submissions. Each story offers four topics that differ in kind: usually one empathic-perspective topic, one workplace-procedure topic, one patient-education topic, and one systems-or-resources topic. Choose per story the topic where you can deploy the chapter's actual terminology and something checkable — the workplace-precaution topic for the impetigo story lets you use contact-transmission vocabulary and real infection-control steps; the agency-services topic for Mr. Davis lets you name what agencies for the visually impaired actually provide. The reply-to-a-classmate option is legitimate but harder to do well: a reply must add terminology or substance the original post lacked, or it reads as the low-effort route it usually is.
The five stories span the course's later chapters, and each carries its own trap. Mr. Davis (DIS 11) tempts generic empathy; the graded version connects his behaviour and others' treatment of him to the psychology of vision loss and names concrete accommodations a clinic can make. The impetigo story (DIS 12) is an infection-control and patient-education double — explaining the condition to a worried parent in plain language while the precautions answer stays clinically correct. Jacob's diabetes story (DIS 13) is developmental: the middle-school answer is about autonomy, peer visibility and the psychology of adolescent self-care, not just insulin facts — and its cost topic wants actual numbers. The contraception story (DIS 14) is values-laden; answers that argue respectfully from stated reasoning outperform answers that declare. The MS Contin story (DIS 15) is a pharmacy-diversion scenario where the strong answers know the real safeguards: identification checks, counselling requirements, and what escalation to a supervisor looks like.
Because the format repeats, the temptation is to write five interchangeable entries. Resist it structurally: each entry should name the story's characters, use that chapter's terminology, and end with something specific — a named service, a procedure step, a cost figure — that could not transplant to the other four.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Use the topic-choice structure strategically: per story, select the topic where chapter terminology and concrete detail are available to you.
- 02Apply each chapter's medical terminology naturally inside a discussion-register answer.
- 03Answer patient-education topics in plain language without losing clinical accuracy.
- 04Ground resource and procedure topics in real services, precautions and safeguards rather than plausible inventions.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01One entry for each of the five stories (DIS 11-15), per the repeated instruction.
- 02Each entry answering one listed topic — or replying substantively to another student's answer, as the format permits.
- 03Answers reflecting the assigned Critical Thinking stories on the textbook's stated pages.
What does a strong entry look like, story by story?
DIS 11 — Mr. Davis and vision loss
Pick between the behavioural, accommodation, surgical-fear, and agency-services topics; the accommodation and services topics reward concrete knowledge of low-vision support and clinic adjustments.
DIS 12 — the impetigo visit
The precautions topic wants real contact-precaution steps for a suspected contagious rash; the education topic wants impetigo explained to Shaylene in plain words with prevention steps for her other children.
DIS 13 — Jacob's insulin routine
The developmental topics ask why adolescence disrupts self-care (autonomy, peer visibility, invincibility) and what Jacob can do about classmates; the cost topic wants year, decade and lifetime figures with the uninsured contrast.
DIS 14 — contraception and culture
Values-heavy topics on responsibility, disagreement, culture and religion: answer with argued positions that acknowledge the other reading, since the topics are built for legitimate disagreement.
DIS 15 — the MS Contin diversion
A pharmacy-safeguard scenario: the strong topics concern verification steps, escalation to a supervisor, systematic dispensing safeguards, and what a worried parent can do about suspected drug abuse.
Which clinical sources make the entries checkable?
Recommended databases
- The course textbook's chapters for each story (primary)
- National Eye Institute
- MedlinePlus
- NIDA
Search sequence
- 1.Reread each story on its stated textbook page before choosing a topic — the choice is only strategic if you know all four options.
- 2.For the chosen topics, pull one authoritative source each: cataract basics for DIS 11, impetigo transmission for DIS 12, prescription-opioid misuse for DIS 15.
- 3.Collect the chapter's key terms per story and check each drafted entry uses them.
- 4.Where the topic wants figures or named services, find them before writing rather than gesturing.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Cataracts
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health · 2023
The authoritative basics behind DIS 11 — what cataract surgery involves and its outcomes — for the fear-easing topic, and the vocabulary for the vision-loss discussion.
- 02
Impetigo
MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2024
Transmission, treatment and prevention in plain language — the model for the DIS 12 parent-education answer and the source behind the precautions topic.
- 03
Prescription Opioids DrugFacts
National Institute on Drug Abuse · 2021
The misuse and dependence facts behind DIS 15 — why MS Contin diversion matters and what help for suspected abuse looks like — for the safeguard and parent topics.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Writing five entries in the same empathic register when the topic sets are built to let you vary — procedure, education, resources — and sameness across entries is visible in a gradebook view.
- Choosing the feelings-topic in every story because it needs no checking, which caps each entry at sympathy without substance.
- Answering the impetigo precautions or pharmacy-safeguard topics with invented procedure — these have real, findable answers and graders in health programs know them.
- Using the reply option as the low-effort route; a reply that adds nothing the original lacked earns what it adds.
- Dropping the chapter terminology entirely — this is a medical terminology course, and entries that never use the vocabulary miss the course's point.
- Forgetting the cost topic in Jacob's story wants arithmetic: a year of diabetes management has estimable components, and naming them is the answer.
Submission checklist
- Five entries submitted, one per story.
- Each entry names its chosen topic and the story's characters.
- Chapter terminology used correctly in every entry.
- Education-topic answers written in parent- or patient-appropriate language.
- Resource, precaution and cost claims each carry something checkable — a named agency, a real precaution, a figure.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.