COM 1100 Unit 5 assignment: letter and formatting
A COM 1100 Unit 5 assignment: download the supplied letter template, replace the bracketed prompts with your own answers, find and insert an image or quote describing how you feel about college so far with the link to its source, then format the document to a precise specification and save it under a required filename.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 12, 2026
Why is formatting worth as much as content?
Read this as two assignments in one document, because it is graded that way. The first is reflective writing — completing a letter about how college is going — and the second is a formatting exercise in which the marker checks a specific list of operations. The formatting half is worth as much as the content half and it is the half students lose marks on, usually by leaving something behind. Delete all of the directions, the text in brackets, is a real instruction and a bracketed prompt left in the finished letter is the most common single deduction on this assignment. Read the file once at the end looking only for square brackets, before you read it for sense. Those are two different passes and doing them together is how a placeholder survives to submission, because your eye reads what the sentence means rather than what is on the page.
The formatting specification is short and checkable, so treat it as a checklist rather than as advice. Right-align your name and date at the top, which in Word is one keyboard shortcut with the cursor in that block. Left-align the body of the letter, which usually means undoing a justification you did not apply deliberately. Use the tools in Word to find and correct spelling errors, which means running the spelling and grammar checker rather than trusting your own reading. Save the file as Lastname_COM1100_A2_letter, using your actual surname, because a filename is part of the deliverable here and it is trivially checkable. Each of these maps directly onto the stated competency about formatting a document according to instructions, so working through them one at a time, ticking each off, is the fastest route to full marks on that half. None of them takes longer than a few seconds, which is what makes losing marks here so expensive.
The image or quote step has a small trap in it. You are asked to find something that describes how you feel about college so far, and then to paste the link of the website you got it from into the document. That link is not decoration: it is the assignment teaching source attribution in the least academic setting it can find, so paste the actual page address rather than the address of a search results page or an image thumbnail. Choose something that genuinely matches what you wrote in the letter, since a mismatch between an upbeat quote and a letter about struggling is the kind of thing a marker notices immediately. If you use an image, check it actually appears in the saved document rather than only in the editor, and open the finished file once before submitting to confirm nothing shifted when it was saved.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Treat the formatting specification as a checkable list rather than as guidance.
- 02Remove every bracketed instruction from the finished document.
- 03Apply alignment and spell-check tools deliberately rather than by eye.
- 04Attribute a found image or quote with a real source link.
- 05Match the chosen image or quote to what the letter actually says.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A completed letter with every bracketed prompt replaced.
- 02An image or quote describing how you feel about college so far.
- 03The link to the website it came from.
- 04Right-aligned name and date, left-aligned body text, spell-checked.
- 05A file saved as Lastname_COM1100_A2_letter.
What is the formatting checklist?
Complete the letter
Replace each bracketed prompt with a genuine answer about how college is going.
Find and attribute the image or quote
Choose something that matches what you wrote, insert it, and paste the source page link.
Format
Delete directions, right-align the name and date, left-align the body, run the spell checker.
Save and submit
Use the required filename, reopen the file to confirm it survived, then submit.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
LearnFree | Free Online Courses and Practical Skills
Goodwill Community Foundation · 2024
Word tutorials on alignment, spell check, inserting images and saving with a specified filename.
- 02
Plagiarism Overview - Purdue OWL
Purdue University · 2024
Why the source link matters: attributing found material is the same habit in a non-academic setting.
- 03
Academic Integrity at MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · 2024
Practical guidance on crediting images and quotations you did not create.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Leaving bracketed directions in the submitted document.
- Centring or justifying the body text instead of left-aligning it.
- Skipping the spelling and grammar check because the text looks fine.
- Pasting a search results link instead of the source page address.
- Choosing a quote that contradicts the tone of the letter.
- Submitting with the template's original filename.
- Inserting an image that does not survive the save.
Submission checklist
- No square brackets anywhere in the document.
- Name and date right-aligned at the top.
- Body text left-aligned throughout.
- Spelling and grammar checker run and corrections accepted.
- Image or quote present, with the source page link beside it.
- Filename in the exact Lastname_COM1100_A2_letter form.
- The saved file opened once and checked before submitting.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.