Communication Change Challenge Part 1 guide
Part 1 of the semester-long Communication Change Challenge: list four to eight interpersonal communication behaviours you cannot do, re-read them substituting won't and then don't know how to, eliminate the won't items, narrow the remainder to one issue, and write a project statement naming the behaviour and the people involved, in two to two and a half pages of APA.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 12, 2026
What is the can't, won't, don't-know filter for?
The framework is a filter, and its whole purpose is to stop you choosing a project you cannot actually complete. Reading each item aloud with won't substituted for can't separates behaviours you are choosing not to do — which are matters of will and are eliminated from the project — from behaviours you genuinely do not know how to change, which are the only ones a course can teach. Being honest at this step is the difference between a workable project and eight weeks spent trying to change something you were never going to change, which is why the assignment spends so much space on it. If your entire list survives the won't test unchanged, you have almost certainly been generous with yourself, because as the instructions point out there are very few communication behaviours people are physically unable to perform. Converting two or three items honestly is a sign of a serious Part 1, not a weak one.
The don't know how to substitution needs the caution the assignment itself supplies: do not take it too literally. You may know perfectly well how a good response to criticism sounds and still not know how to get from your existing habit to that response under pressure. That gap — between knowing what good looks like and knowing how to change — is exactly what belongs in this category and exactly what the project is designed to close. When you write the narrative explaining why each item moved, say which kind of not-knowing it is, because that distinction is what the marker is checking and it is the single most common thing missed in Part 1C. Saying plainly that you know what a good version sounds like but cannot produce it in the moment is a more useful self-assessment than claiming ignorance you do not have.
Selection matters more than the writing, because you live with this choice for eight weeks. Pick something that occurs frequently enough to practise, involves people you will genuinely see over the session, and is observable enough that you could tell whether it changed. The prompt is explicit that you must interact with the person or people named in Part 1E over the next eight weeks, so a goal about a relative you see at Christmas fails on availability, and one about being more confident fails on observability. Then the project statement should name the behaviour, the situation in which it occurs, and the specific people, and it should be written in behavioural terms — I will state a disagreement in team meetings rather than staying silent — because Parts 2 and 3 build directly on this sentence. Two to two and a half pages in APA is the limit, so the four to eight descriptions need to be tight from the start.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Use the substitution test honestly to separate unwillingness from lack of know-how.
- 02Recognise that not knowing how to change a habit is different from not knowing what good looks like.
- 03Select a goal that is frequent, observable and involves available people.
- 04Write a project statement in behavioural terms that later parts can build on.
- 05Cover verbal, nonverbal, listening, group and cultural aspects in the initial list.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A list of four to eight communication challenges with a one to two paragraph description each.
- 02The revised 'I won't' list with explanations, and those items eliminated.
- 03The 'I don't know how to' list with narratives, and reasons for anything left in 'I can't'.
- 04A narrative describing how you narrowed to one issue.
- 05A project statement naming the behaviour and the people involved.
- 06Two to two and a half pages in APA format.
How should you choose the one issue?
1A: the 'I can't' list
Four to eight behaviours across verbal, nonverbal, listening, group and cultural dimensions, each described with an example.
1B: the 'I won't' conversion
Which items were really choices, why, and their removal from consideration.
1C: the 'don't know how to' list
The remaining items, with the kind of not-knowing identified, and reasons for anything left behind.
1D: issue selection
How you eliminated the rest — frequency, availability of people, observability, and how much it matters to you.
1E: project statement
The behaviour, the situation and the named people, phrased so Parts 2 and 3 can build on it.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
THERAPEUTIC COMMUNICATION AND THE NURSE-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP
Nursing: Mental Health and Community Concepts, NCBI Bookshelf · 2022
Named verbal and nonverbal communication behaviours, useful vocabulary for describing what you cannot yet do.
- 02
COLLABORATION WITHIN THE INTERPROFESSIONAL TEAM
Nursing Management and Professional Concepts, NCBI Bookshelf · 2022
Group communication and conflict behaviours, for the group aspect the 1A list must cover.
- 03
Cognitive Behavior Therapy
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Why rehearsal and graded practice change behaviour, which is the logic the later parts of this project follow.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Producing a list where nothing converts to 'won't', which reads as avoidance.
- Taking 'I don't know how to' literally and eliminating items you could still learn to change.
- Choosing a goal involving someone you will not see during the session.
- Selecting something unobservable, such as being more confident.
- Skipping the narrative in 1D so the selection looks arbitrary.
- Writing a project statement without naming the specific people.
- Exceeding two and a half pages by over-describing the initial list.
Submission checklist
- Four to eight items, covering verbal, nonverbal, listening, group and cultural aspects.
- One to two paragraphs with an example for each.
- At least one honest conversion to 'I won't', with reasons.
- The 'don't know how to' items distinguished by which kind of not-knowing.
- An explicit elimination narrative in 1D.
- A behavioural project statement naming situation and people.
- Two to two and a half pages, APA.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.