Breastfeeding nursing diagnosis and campaign strategy
The nursing diagnosis is handed to you, so the work is downstream: link it to a health disparity, ground it in data at three levels, and build a campaign that could actually be evaluated.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
The diagnosis is given — build the campaign from it
This assignment supplies its own nursing diagnosis — risk of deficient knowledge of breastfeeding related to lack of education and inadequate milk supply, as evidenced by decreased exclusive breastfeeding rates — so your task is not to generate it but to build everything that follows. The first substantive requirement is the one that determines the grade: explain how the health concern is linked to a health inequity or disparity within the target population. That is a claim requiring data, and breastfeeding is a subject where the disparities are well documented and vary sharply by race, income, and workplace conditions. Return-to-work timing, availability of paid leave, and whether a job allows expressing milk are structural determinants rather than knowledge deficits, which is worth saying because it complicates the diagnosis you were given. Saying so shows you can read a diagnosis critically rather than only apply it.
The data requirement is explicit about three levels — local, state and national — and the brief names Kissimmee and Orlando, so use Osceola and Orange County figures rather than Florida-wide numbers where county data exists. That single choice makes the paper look grounded. For the campaign, remember that a social media campaign has a defined audience, platform, message and call to action, and the platform choice should follow from who you are trying to reach rather than from what is popular. Then build in evaluation from the start: reach and engagement are process measures, and the outcome measure has to connect to the diagnosis, which means exclusive breastfeeding duration rather than likes. Naming which you can realistically obtain and which you would need a partner organisation for is the kind of practical honesty this assignment rewards, and it separates a campaign plan from a campaign wish.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Link a community health concern to a documented disparity using data.
- 02Locate and use health data at county, state and national levels.
- 03Design a social media campaign whose outcome measure connects to the diagnosis.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01The nursing diagnosis statement as supplied.
- 02A disparity analysis supported by data at three levels.
- 03An inventory of existing community and prevention resources.
- 04A campaign strategy with audience, platform, message and evaluation, in APA format.
From disparity to campaign to evaluation
State the diagnosis and target population
Restate the supplied diagnosis and define precisely who the campaign is for.
Link to a disparity
Show with data how breastfeeding outcomes differ across groups in the target area.
Resources and underlying causes
Inventory what already exists locally and analyse why the gap persists despite it.
Data at three levels
Present county, Florida and national figures, noting where they diverge.
Campaign and evaluation
Define audience, platform, message and call to action, with process and outcome measures.
County and state data for Kissimmee and Orlando
Recommended databases
- CDC Breastfeeding Report Card
- Florida Department of Health county health profiles
- County Health Rankings
- CDCynergy
- PubMed Central
Search sequence
- 1.Start with the CDC Breastfeeding Report Card for national and state figures broken down by demographic group.
- 2.Use the Florida Department of Health county profiles for Osceola and Orange rather than state aggregates.
- 3.Search for workplace and paid leave evidence, which supports the structural half of the causes section.
- 4.Use CDCynergy as the brief suggests for the campaign planning framework, since it structures the evaluation too.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
About Breastfeeding Data
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2024
Carries the disparity data this paper needs — initiation by race and ethnicity, by WIC participation and by maternal age — alongside the Healthy People 2030 targets.
- 02
About Adverse Childhood Experiences
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2024
Frames early-life conditions as population health determinants, supporting the disparity rather than deficit reading of the diagnosis.
- 03
Wealth Inequality
Pew Research Center · 2024
Data on the economic conditions that shape whether a parent can take leave or express milk at work.
- 04
About CAHPS
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
A model of designing measurement into a health intervention from the start rather than evaluating it afterwards.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Treating the concern as purely a knowledge deficit when the determinants are structural.
- Using state-level data where county data for Osceola and Orange exists.
- Choosing a platform by popularity rather than by audience.
- Evaluating the campaign on engagement metrics that do not connect to breastfeeding outcomes.
Submission checklist
- Is the disparity claim supported by data rather than asserted?
- Are all three data levels — local, state, national — present?
- Does the platform choice follow from the target audience?
- Is there an outcome measure tied to the diagnosis, not just reach?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.