Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
Allied healthResearch paperRespiratory conditions

COPD research paper writing guide

A nine-page APA research paper on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with five pages of content, selecting from aspects including definition, diagnostic criteria, causes, signs and symptoms, types, prevention, environmental causes, short- and long-term treatment, and prognosis, using at least three professional journals from the university library.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 12, 2026

01

How many of the listed aspects should you take?

The instruction that shapes this paper is the one in brackets: those are some aspects to consider, not all aspects need to be covered. Ten headings across five pages of content would give each about half a page, which produces an encyclopaedia entry rather than a research paper. Choose four or five of the listed aspects and develop them, and say in your introduction which you are covering and why — that single sentence converts an apparent omission into a stated scope. Diagnosis, causes including environmental exposure, treatment across both timescales, and prognosis form a coherent spine because each follows from the last; adding definition briefly at the start costs a paragraph and orients the reader. Five pages of content is roughly 1,250 words, so four developed sections at around 300 words each is the arithmetic to plan against.

The aspects that reward depth are diagnosis and treatment. Diagnostic criteria means spirometry and the post-bronchodilator ratio that defines persistent airflow limitation, not a list of symptoms — the distinction between clinical suspicion and confirmed diagnosis is exactly the kind of precision a research paper is graded on. The types question is more interesting than it looks: the chronic bronchitis and emphysema descriptions are traditional phenotypes rather than separate diseases, and most patients have features of both, so saying so is more accurate than presenting them as a clean taxonomy. Causes should separate the dominant exposure from the others without dismissing the others, since occupational dust and fume exposure, biomass fuel smoke, and genetic alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency all matter and the assignment names environmental causes as a separate aspect from causes generally, which is a signal to treat exposure in its own right rather than as a footnote.

Treatment split into short and long term is the assignment's own framing and it maps cleanly onto real practice: short-term management of exacerbations with bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics where indicated and oxygen or ventilatory support; long-term management with maintenance inhaled therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation, vaccination, oxygen where criteria are met, and smoking cessation as the single intervention that alters the disease course rather than only the symptoms. Prognosis should be framed in terms of what modifies it rather than as a survival figure. The library requirement is at least three professional journals, so use the university's database rather than open web sources for those three, and remember the page count is five pages of content within a nine-page total including cover, abstract, conclusion and references, so an over-long content section will not be rewarded either. Count the pages against that structure before you start writing, because a cover page and an abstract absorb two of the nine before a word of content appears.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Select four or five aspects and state the scope in the introduction.
  • 02
    Give diagnosis as spirometric criteria rather than as a symptom list.
  • 03
    Present the phenotypes accurately rather than as separate diseases.
  • 04
    Separate the dominant cause from the other exposures without dismissing them.
  • 05
    Frame prognosis by what modifies it rather than by a survival number.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Research paper about Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The research paper is in APA style (times new roman, font 12, double space) and must be 5 pages of content and 9 pages in total (cover, abstract, content, conclusion, and references page) I need the five content pages with conclusion and references. The aspects that can be considered in the research paper are: *Concept/definition *Criteria to be followed in order to be diagnosed. *Causes *Symptoms and signs *Different types (if so) *Prevention *Environmental causes *Treatment plans both short terms and long terms *Prognosis *And so on… (Those are some aspects to consider, not all aspect need to be covered). The references must be from FNU database library with at least three professional journals. The link for the library is www.lirn.net/databases/ then type Florida National University
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    Five pages of content within a nine-page APA paper.
  2. 02
    A stated scope covering the aspects you chose.
  3. 03
    A conclusion and a references page.
  4. 04
    At least three professional journal sources from the university library.
03

What does diagnostic criteria actually mean here?

01

Definition and scope

Define the condition briefly and state which of the listed aspects the paper covers and why.

02

Diagnosis

Set out spirometry and the post-bronchodilator criterion for persistent airflow limitation, and distinguish clinical suspicion from confirmed diagnosis.

03

Causes and environmental exposure

Give the dominant exposure alongside occupational dust and fumes, biomass smoke, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, with their relative contributions.

04

Treatment and prognosis

Separate exacerbation management from maintenance therapy, rehabilitation, vaccination, oxygen and cessation, then frame prognosis by its modifiers.

04

Where is the COPD evidence?

Recommended databases

  • University library journal databases
  • NCBI Bookshelf / StatPearls
  • NHLBI

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Choose four or five aspects before searching, so the reading stays targeted.
  2. 2.
    Pull the spirometric diagnostic criterion from a clinical source and quote it precisely.
  3. 3.
    Search the library databases specifically for the three required professional journals.
  4. 4.
    Check what is documented to modify prognosis before writing that section.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    The diagnostic criteria, phenotype overlap, staged treatment and prognostic factors that the content pages are built from.

  2. 02

    COPD - What Is COPD?

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute · 2024

    The causes and risk factors section, including occupational and environmental exposure and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

  3. 03

    COPD | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2024

    The prevention and self-management content behind the long-term treatment and prevention aspects.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Covering all ten listed aspects at half a page each.
  • Describing diagnosis by symptoms with no spirometric criterion.
  • Presenting chronic bronchitis and emphysema as two distinct diseases.
  • Naming only one cause and ignoring occupational and environmental exposure.
  • Merging short-term and long-term treatment into one section.
  • Using open web sources where professional journals are required.

Submission checklist

  • Scope stated in the introduction, with the chosen aspects named.
  • Diagnostic criteria given spirometrically.
  • Phenotype overlap acknowledged.
  • Causes cover the dominant exposure plus occupational, environmental and genetic factors.
  • Treatment separated into short-term and long-term as the brief specifies.
  • Five content pages, nine total, APA, three or more professional journals.

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order