Culturally Based Behaviors and Health Promotion
Three behaviours from a group that is not your own, and education that stays respectful. The second half is harder than the first and is where the marks separate.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 16, 2026
A group other than your own, and behaviours that do not promote health
Two constraints sit in this short prompt and both matter. The group must be other than your own, which rules out the comfortable option of writing about a community whose practices you can describe from the inside, and forces you to work from evidence rather than from memory. And the behaviours must be ones that may not promote health — a phrase worth reading carefully, because 'may not' is hedged on purpose. Practices that look health-negative from a biomedical standpoint often carry social, spiritual or protective functions that the biomedical view cannot see, and a post that lists three behaviours as simple errors has already failed the respect requirement in the second half. Choose behaviours you can source: dietary practices tied to celebration or scarcity, delayed care-seeking rooted in historical mistreatment, reliance on traditional healers before biomedical services, or medication practices such as sharing prescriptions within a family. Each has a literature you can cite.
The education half is where the real work is, and respectful is the operative word. Respectful education does not mean gentle delivery of the same instruction. It means starting from what the practice is for, keeping whatever part of it can be kept, and negotiating only the specific element that carries the risk — which is Leininger's accommodation and repatterning applied to teaching. Concretely: assess before you teach, use a trained interpreter rather than a family member, involve whoever actually makes health decisions in that family, deliver materials at an appropriate literacy level in the right language, and check understanding with teach-back rather than by asking whether the patient understood. Name one behaviour where you would preserve most of the practice and change one component, since that is the clearest demonstration that you understood what the prompt was asking for. Say what you would keep, and say it before you say what you would change.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Identify culturally based health behaviours from evidence rather than assumption.
- 02Recognise the function a practice serves before judging its health effect.
- 03Design education that negotiates a component rather than replacing a practice.
- 04Apply concrete techniques such as interpreter use and teach-back.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A named cultural group other than your own.
- 02Three culturally based behaviours that may not promote health.
- 03The function each behaviour serves within the culture.
- 04A respectful health promotion education approach.
- 05At least one scholarly source about that specific group.
Three behaviours, then the education that respects them
The group, and why you chose it
Name the group and locate it in your practice population.
Behaviour one, with its function
Describe a practice and what it does for the community.
Behaviours two and three
Do the same for two further practices, sourced.
Assess before teaching
Describe the cultural assessment that precedes education.
Respectful education in practice
Set out techniques: interpreters, decision-makers, literacy level, teach-back.
Keeping most of the practice
Show one case where you change a component rather than the whole practice.
Evidence about one cultural group, not about culture
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- PubMed Central
- OpenStax Population Health for Nurses
- MedlinePlus
Search sequence
- 1.Choose the group first, then search for health behaviour evidence about that group.
- 2.Look for sources written by members of the community where possible.
- 3.Check health literacy and language access evidence for the education section.
- 4.Avoid sources that describe a culture as a fixed list of traits.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
22.3 Cultural Assessment
OpenStax, Population Health for Nurses · 2024
Cultural assessment as the step before education, with a structured approach.
- 02
Health Literacy
MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine · 2025
Health literacy, which determines whether respectful education is also effective education.
- 03
Examining nursing students' learning through reflective analysis using Ray's Transcultural Caring Dynamics in Nursing and Health Care Theory
BMC Medical Education · 2025
Transcultural caring in practice, including where students got it wrong.
- 04
Cultural diversity in health and illness
Rachel E. Spector, via the Internet Archive lending library · 2004
A standard reference for heritage-consistent health practices across groups.
- 05
TEACHING & LEARNING
Nursing Advanced Skills, Open RN, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
Teaching and learning methods, including teach-back and readiness assessment.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Choosing your own cultural group, which the prompt excludes.
- Listing behaviours as errors without acknowledging what they are for.
- Treating respectful as a matter of tone rather than of method.
- Citing general cultural competence literature instead of evidence about the group.
Submission checklist
- Is the group genuinely other than your own?
- Does each behaviour come with the function it serves?
- Does the education section name specific techniques?
- Is there at least one source about this group specifically?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.