Dimensions of performance and indicators by care setting
Say which dimensions of performance matter in health care, how you would know an organisation is performing well, and which indicators a hospital, a physician practice, a home care agency, a long-term care facility and a managed care organisation should each track.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
A framework first, then five different scorecards
Answer the first question with a framework rather than a list, because everything after it depends on having one. The Institute of Medicine's six aims give you a defensible set — safe, effective, patient-centred, timely, efficient and equitable — and the Quadruple Aim adds the workforce dimension that the original omitted. Naming a framework does two things: it stops the answer becoming whatever measures you happen to remember, and it gives you a way to test any indicator by asking which dimension it evidences. Then answer the second question with the structure, process and outcome distinction. Knowing an organisation performs well means having outcome measures, not just process compliance, and it means comparison — against benchmark, against trend, and risk-adjusted so a hospital is not rewarded for treating healthier patients than the hospital it is being compared against, which is the commonest way a league table misleads.
The rest of the question names five settings and expects five different answers, which is where most posts underperform by repeating hospital measures throughout. A hospital tracks mortality, readmission, hospital-acquired infection, patient experience and length of stay. A physician practice is judged on preventive screening rates, chronic disease control such as blood pressure and glycaemic targets, access measured as third-next-available appointment, and continuity. A home care agency lives on functional improvement, avoidable hospital admission, timeliness of the first visit and caregiver experience. A long-term care facility tracks pressure injuries, falls with injury, antipsychotic use, staffing hours per resident day and resident quality of life. A managed care organisation is measured on population-level utilisation, preventive coverage, network adequacy and member experience. Ground each list in a real reporting programme so the answer is not invented, and note in passing that measures create behaviour, which is why risk adjustment and a balanced set matter.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Apply a recognised quality framework to define the dimensions of performance.
- 02Distinguish structure, process and outcome measures and say what each can evidence.
- 03Select indicators appropriate to five distinct care settings.
- 04Explain why risk adjustment and benchmarking are needed to interpret a measure.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Dimensions of performance ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Dimensions of performance
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01The dimensions of performance that matter, drawn from a named framework.
- 02How you would know whether an organisation is performing well.
- 03Indicators for a hospital.
- 04Indicators for a physician practice.
- 05Indicators for a home care agency and a long-term care facility.
- 06Indicators for a managed care organisation.
Dimensions, evidence of good performance, then setting by setting
A framework for performance
Set out the six aims and the workforce dimension before naming any measure.
Knowing an organisation performs well
Explain structure, process and outcome, plus benchmark and trend.
Hospital indicators
Give measures across safety, effectiveness and experience.
Physician practice indicators
Focus on prevention, chronic disease control, access and continuity.
Home care and long-term care indicators
Give function, avoidable admission, pressure injuries, falls and staffing.
Managed care indicators, and what measures do to behaviour
Give population measures, then note gaming and the need for a balanced set.
Where each sector's measures are already published
Recommended databases
- CMS Care Compare
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- NCQA HEDIS measure list
- The Joint Commission core measures
- Health Affairs
Search sequence
- 1.Take the six aims from an authoritative source and write them down as your frame.
- 2.Open a public reporting programme for each of the five settings and note its measures.
- 3.Identify one outcome measure per setting rather than only process measures.
- 4.Read how risk adjustment works in one of those programmes.
- 5.Find one source on unintended consequences of measurement.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Find Healthcare Providers: Compare Care Near You | Medicare
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2025
Published measures for hospitals, home health, nursing homes and physician practices, so the indicator lists are real.
- 02
Quality Measures
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2025
The federal measure inventory, showing what a defensible indicator set looks like for each setting.
- 03
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Institute of Medicine, NCBI Bookshelf · 2001
The original statement of the six aims, which is the framework the first question should open with.
- 04
Quality Assurance
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Structure, process and outcome measurement, which is how the second question is answered.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing measures with no framework, so nothing explains why those measures.
- Repeating the hospital list for all five settings.
- Relying entirely on process measures and never naming an outcome.
- Ignoring risk adjustment, which makes raw comparison misleading.
- Leaving out patient experience, which is a dimension in every framework.
- Inventing indicators when each sector already has published reporting programmes.
Submission checklist
- A named framework opens the answer.
- Structure, process and outcome are distinguished.
- All five settings receive their own indicators.
- At least one indicator per setting is an outcome measure.
- Benchmarking or risk adjustment is addressed.
- Indicators are traceable to a real reporting programme.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.