DNP 805 Week 7: informatics case report guide
The integration requirement is the spine: one technology that follows the patient from your care setting to home and then to the clinic. Choose a technology that cannot do that and the report has no middle.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
One patient, one technology, three settings
Choose the technology for its reach rather than for its sophistication, because the assignment asks it to do something specific: integrate treatment, monitoring or communication from your chosen care setting to the home and then to ongoing clinic care. A device that only works on the ward fails that test however impressive it is. Remote monitoring with a clinic-facing dashboard passes it; a patient portal with messaging and result release passes it; a structured discharge and medication reconciliation workflow that persists into primary care passes it. Pick the setting and disease process first — congestive heart failure in acute care, diabetes in primary care, falls in long-term care — and then select the technology that can actually follow that patient across all three stages. Pick the setting and the disease process first, then choose the technology that can actually follow that patient across all three stages, because the reverse order produces a report whose middle section has nowhere to go.
Work the eight required components in the order given, because the rubric follows that order and the case sits in the middle for a reason. The literature review must be synthesised rather than listed, which means it should reach a position about what the evidence supports rather than summarising sources in turn. The case itself needs a real patient situation with its problems and its barriers to care named explicitly, since the barriers are what your technology is being proposed against. Two instructions are easy to lose: primary sources published within the last five years, which rules out most textbooks and review articles you may have relied on, and the Christian worldview integration in the summary. Treat the latter as a genuine reflection on stewardship, dignity and care for the vulnerable applied to your solution, not as a sentence bolted on before the conclusion. Read the rubric before drafting rather than after, since it orders the sections for you.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Select a technology capable of spanning three care settings.
- 02Synthesise a literature review into a position rather than a list.
- 03Describe a real case with its barriers to care named explicitly.
- 04Integrate a worldview reflection into a technical summary without ornament.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Introduction with a problem statement and the disease process in your practice focus.
- 02A synthesised literature review from primary sources within five years.
- 03A real case description with problems and barriers to care.
- 04A technology solution and its specific application to the case.
- 05A summary integrating a Christian worldview, and a conclusion.
- 06Submission to the dropbox, LopesWrite, and the Learner Dissertation Page.
The eight required components, in order
Problem statement and disease process
Establish the practice focus, the disease process and why it is a problem there.
Synthesised literature review
Reach a position on what the evidence supports for this technology and condition.
The case and its barriers
Describe a real patient situation, its problems and the barriers to care.
The technology across settings
Describe the technology and how it integrates care from setting to home to clinic.
Summary and conclusion
Integrate the proposed solutions with a worldview reflection, then conclude.
Primary sources from the last five years
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- PubMed Central
- JAMIA
- AHRQ
Search sequence
- 1.Filter every search to the last five years and to primary studies before you start collecting.
- 2.Search your disease process AND the technology, then again with the care-transition term.
- 3.Check whether any study followed patients across settings, which is your strongest citation.
- 4.Read the rubric's literature review criterion before drafting, since it asks for synthesis.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Reducing Hospital Readmissions
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
The readmission evidence base, which is where a technology spanning settings has to show it makes a difference.
- 02
Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
A structured discharge intervention, useful as the comparison your proposed technology is measured against.
- 03
Telehealth Systems
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Telehealth modalities set out systematically, which helps you choose one that genuinely reaches all three settings.
- 04
Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review
BMC Health Services Research · 2014
A systematic review of implementing electronic records in hospitals, evidence for the barriers section rather than the aspiration.
- 05
Interoperability
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology · 2024
Whether information actually crosses organisational boundaries, which is the technical constraint on the integration claim.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Choosing a technology that cannot follow the patient home.
- Summarising sources one by one instead of synthesising them.
- Describing a case with no barriers, which leaves the technology solving nothing.
- Using reviews and textbooks when primary sources within five years are required.
- Appending the worldview sentence rather than integrating the reflection.
- Uploading to the dropbox but not to the Learner Dissertation Page.
Submission checklist
- Does your technology work in all three settings?
- Does the literature review reach a position?
- Are the patient's barriers to care stated?
- Are the sources primary and within five years?
- Is the worldview integrated into the summary rather than appended?
- Have you uploaded to both required destinations?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.