Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
NursingLiterature reviewNursing research

DNP 820 Week 4: introduction to the literature review

The structure is prescribed by arithmetic: five concepts, three subthemes each, five sub-sections per subtheme. Working out that shape before drafting is what makes 2,000 to 3,000 words achievable.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 15, 2026

01

Fifteen articles, five concepts, fifteen subthemes

Do the arithmetic before you write anything, because it determines everything. Five major concepts with three subthemes each gives fifteen subthemes, and each subtheme needs five things addressed: an introduction, the research questions the studies posed, the sample populations, the limitations, and the conclusions with recommendations for further research. At 2,000 to 3,000 words that is roughly 130 to 200 words per subtheme, which is two tight paragraphs. Knowing that in advance changes how you write — there is no room for preamble, and no room to describe a study at length. It also means the concepts must be genuinely distinct, since two overlapping concepts will produce six subthemes that repeat each other and consume space you do not have. Overlap costs you twice: once in the repeated writing and again in the space it takes from a concept that had something to say. Fifteen is enough that at least one will turn out to be the wrong sort.

The empirical criterion in Part 1 does real work and the checklist is provided to enforce it: an empirical article reports original data collected and analysed by its authors, which excludes literature reviews, editorials, theoretical papers and clinical guidance however relevant they seem. At least one must be quantitative. Check each article against the checklist before it enters the chart, because an article that fails the criterion at the synthesis stage costs you a replacement and a re-chart. Then let the chart do the work it is designed for: complete it as you read rather than in a batch afterwards, and the concepts will surface from the completed rows instead of being imposed on them. That is the difference between synthesis and summary. Synthesis groups by finding across studies; summary walks through articles in turn — and with fifteen articles and a word ceiling, summary cannot fit even if you wanted it.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Apply an empirical criterion to article selection.
  • 02
    Use a charting template to surface concepts from the evidence.
  • 03
    Distinguish synthesis from sequential summary.
  • 04
    Work to a prescribed structure under a word ceiling.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Details: Empirical research is the foundation of scholarly research and scholarly writing. An empirical article is defined as one that reports actual results of a research study. An empirical article includes a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the study’s methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study. As you search the library for scholarly research, you should limit your search to identify empirical articles. (You can use the “Empirical Research Checklist” from DNP-801 to assist in this determination.) After finding an empirical study, begin to assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers the proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate. As you move forward in your doctoral journey, you will read research papers that will require you to assess the validity of the studies in question. To accomplish this, qualitative assessments about the research must be made by comparing, contrasting, and synthesizing what the research says. In this assignment, you will continue to develop the skill of writing, by reviewing 15 research articles associated with your chosen topic and using the content to identify at least five major concepts and subthemes related to your topic. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of this assignment: Use the “Empirical Research Checklist” to assist in the determination of empirical articles. Use the “Research Article Chart” to provide a summary review of each component of your assignment. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Part 1: Selection of 15 Articles Select 15 empirical articles related to your PICOT question. Use the “Empirical Research Checklist” worksheet to ensure that each article you select meets all of the established criteria. At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology. Part 2: Research Article Chart Using the articles acquired in Part 1, provide a summary review of each component using the “Research Article Chart” template. Part 3: Synthesis of Research Studies Based upon your review of the 15 research articles, identify at least five major concepts that relate to your project topic, and three subthemes related to each concept. Using the information from the completed “Research Article Chart,” and the major concepts and subthemes you have identified, write a 2,000-3,000 word paper that synthesizes the content of the 15 research studies. Summarize each major concept and focus on providing a detailed synthesis of the three identified subthemes that support that concept by addressing the following. Introduction of the identified subtheme Summary of the research questions posed by the studies Summary of the sample populations used Summary of the limitations of the studies Summary of the conclusion and recommendations for further research Portfolio Practice Hours: Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the learner, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10. DNP 820 Week 4 Introduction to the Literature Review You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network. To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-820 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor. DNP-820-RS-EmpiricalResearchChecklist-Student.docx DNP-820-RS-ResearchArticleChart.docx Introduction to the Literature Review
02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    Fifteen empirical articles, at least one quantitative, checked against the checklist.
  2. 02
    A completed Research Article Chart for each.
  3. 03
    At least five major concepts with three subthemes each.
  4. 04
    A 2,000-3,000 word synthesis covering all five sub-sections per subtheme.
  5. 05
    APA formatting and the practice hours statement.
03

Select, chart, then synthesise by subtheme

01

Select against the criterion

Screen fifteen articles with the Empirical Research Checklist before charting.

02

Chart as you read

Complete the Research Article Chart per article at the point of reading.

03

Derive concepts and subthemes

Group the charted findings into five distinct concepts with three subthemes each.

04

Write by subtheme

Address the five required sub-sections within each subtheme, to the word budget.

04

Meeting the empirical criterion before charting

Recommended databases

  • CINAHL
  • PubMed Central
  • The Cochrane Library
  • The Empirical Research Checklist

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Screen each candidate against the empirical checklist before adding it to the chart.
  2. 2.
    Complete the chart row immediately after reading each article.
  3. 3.
    Group the completed rows by finding before deciding on your concepts.
  4. 4.
    Count your word budget per subtheme before drafting.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

    BMJ · 2021

    What a synthesis is required to report, which is the standard your grouping and reporting should follow.

  2. 02

    CASP Checklists

    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme · 2024

    Design-specific appraisal, which is what fills the limitations sub-section for each study.

  3. 03

    STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

    EQUATOR Network · 2024

    What an observational study should report, useful for judging sample populations and limitations.

  4. 04

    JBI Critical Appraisal Tools

    JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute), University of Adelaide · 2024

    Instruments for the range of designs fifteen articles will span.

  5. 05

    Asking Focused Questions

    Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford · 2024

    The PICOT question the whole selection has to relate to, which is the relevance test for every article.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Including reviews or theoretical papers, which are not empirical.
  • Choosing overlapping concepts, which produces repeating subthemes.
  • Writing article by article instead of by subtheme.
  • Completing the chart in a batch after reading rather than as you go.
  • Ignoring the word arithmetic and running out of space at concept four.

Submission checklist

  • Does every article report original data collected by its authors?
  • Is at least one quantitative?
  • Are your five concepts genuinely distinct?
  • Does each subtheme cover all five required sub-sections?
  • Is the paper organised by subtheme rather than by article?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order