Environmental sociology, racism and justice
Two questions, and the second turns on a distinction students routinely blur: environmental racism names a pattern of harm, environmental justice names a movement and a principle responding to it.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Define the field, then separate racism from justice
The first question asks what environmental sociology means to you and what an environmental sociologist studies, which is an invitation to define the field by its central claim rather than by listing topics. The claim is that environmental conditions and social structures produce each other: who is exposed to pollution, who bears the cost of extraction, whose neighbourhood receives the landfill, and how those exposures track existing lines of race and class. That framing distinguishes the discipline from environmental science, which studies the physical system, and it is the sentence worth opening the post with, since everything after it becomes an elaboration. Saying what an environmental sociologist actually does — fieldwork on affected communities, spatial analysis of facility siting, policy analysis, social movement research — grounds the definition in method rather than in subject matter, which is what the question is really asking when it says what an environmental sociologist studies.
The second question requires the two constructs to be genuinely compared and contrasted, and they are not opposites. Environmental racism describes an empirical pattern: hazardous facilities, contaminated water and polluted air disproportionately located in communities of colour, whether by explicit decision, by market processes, or by the path of least political resistance. Environmental justice is the normative and organisational response — the principle that no community should bear a disproportionate share of environmental harm, and the movement that has pressed it since the Warren County protests of 1982, which is where the movement is usually dated from. So one names a documented condition and the other names both a claim about how things ought to be and the organised campaign pressing that claim. Give real examples for each, since the brief asks for them, and choose cases with documented evidence rather than the ones most frequently cited without sources, which markers see repeated across every cohort.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Define environmental sociology by its central claim rather than by its topics.
- 02Distinguish an empirical pattern from a normative principle and a movement.
- 03Support both constructs with documented examples.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A definition of environmental sociology and what its practitioners study.
- 02A comparison and contrast of environmental racism and environmental justice.
- 03At least one documented example of each construct.
- 04APA-formatted citations.
What the discipline studies, then the two constructs
Define by the central claim
State that the field studies how social structure and environmental exposure produce each other.
What the work looks like
Name the methods — community fieldwork, siting analysis, policy and movement research.
Environmental racism as a pattern
Describe the documented distribution of environmental harm and the mechanisms producing it.
Environmental justice as principle and movement
Explain the normative claim and the organising history behind it.
Examples with evidence
Give a documented case for each and say what makes it an instance.
Sources for the movement and its evidence
Recommended databases
- EPA environmental justice resources
- JSTOR sociology collection
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- US Commission on Civil Rights reports
- Your course readings
Search sequence
- 1.Look for the foundational siting studies, which supply the empirical basis for the racism construct.
- 2.Read a primary account of Warren County rather than a summary, since it anchors the justice movement.
- 3.Search for quantitative facility-siting analyses to distinguish mechanism from outcome.
- 4.Check that any example you use has documentation you can cite, not just wide circulation.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Wealth Inequality
Pew Research Center · 2024
Data on how economic position is distributed by race, which is the structural context both constructs operate in.
- 02
About Adverse Childhood Experiences
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2024
Population evidence that environmental and social conditions have measurable health consequences, supporting the harm claim empirically.
- 03
Code of Ethics
National Association of Social Workers · 2021
A professional statement of the social justice principle in its normative form, useful for the environmental justice half.
- 04
The Criminal Justice System: Statistics
RAINN · 2024
An example of using systematically collected statistics to demonstrate a structural pattern rather than asserting one.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Treating environmental racism and environmental justice as synonyms or as opposites.
- Defining the field by listing topics rather than by its explanatory claim.
- Offering examples without evidence, relying on cases everyone repeats.
- Confusing environmental sociology with environmental science.
Submission checklist
- Does your definition distinguish the field from environmental science?
- Have you said what an environmental sociologist actually does methodologically?
- Is the pattern-versus-principle distinction explicit?
- Does each construct have a documented example?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.