Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
NursingCase studyImmunology

Janet case study: rhinitis, polyps and hypersensitivity

For Janet, a 20-year-old with five weeks of itchy eyes, watery rhinorrhoea, night cough, sneezing and bilateral nasal polyps, give three differentials with reasoning, list further history questions, explain the pathophysiology of your primary diagnosis, differentiate the hypersensitivity mechanisms and say which one she is experiencing.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 14, 2026

01

Polyps, a flexural rash and a seasonal pattern

Janet's case is assembled out of atopy. The flaking erythematous rash on the flexor surfaces of both arms is atopic dermatitis; the five-week course with sneezing, watery discharge and itching every spring and autumn is seasonal allergic rhinitis rather than the run of colds she calls it; the night cough raises cough-variant asthma or postnasal drip and completes the atopic triad. The findings that deserve most attention are the bilateral medium-sized nasal polyps and the maxillary sinus tenderness, because polyps in a 20-year-old are not a throwaway detail. They explain the chronic obstruction, they justify sinusitis as a differential, and in a patient this young they are the reason cystic fibrosis and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease belong in your list of further history questions. Boggy red mucosa, clear postnasal drainage and clear lungs together point the primary diagnosis at allergic rhinitis with nasal polyposis rather than at the recurrent infection she has been calling a cold.

The last two questions are separate and posts routinely merge them. Question four asks you to differentiate the types of hypersensitivity, which means all four Gell and Coombs mechanisms set out against each other: type I IgE-mediated and immediate, type II antibody-mediated cytotoxicity against cell-surface antigen, type III immune-complex deposition, type IV delayed and T-cell mediated. Give each its mediator, its timing and one clinical example. Question five then applies that framework to Janet and wants type I, argued from the immediacy of her symptoms on exposure, the eosinophil and mast cell involvement, and the seasonal pattern. Her atopic dermatitis is worth a sentence here because it is often described as having a delayed type IV component alongside the IgE sensitisation, which is exactly the nuance that separates a strong answer from a merely correct one, and it costs you no more than two sentences to include.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Assemble a differential for chronic rhinitis from subjective and objective findings.
  • 02
    Identify the further history that nasal polyps in a young adult make necessary.
  • 03
    Explain the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis from sensitisation to late-phase response.
  • 04
    Differentiate the four Gell and Coombs hypersensitivity mechanisms by mediator and timing.
  • 05
    Apply that classification to a specific patient and defend the choice.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Janet, a 20 year-old college student, is experiencing a five-week history of itchy eyes and nasal congestion with watery nasal discharge. She also complains of a “tickling” cough, especially at night, and she has had episodes of repetitive sneezing. Janet gets frequent “colds” every spring and fall. Physical Examination Vital Signs: Temp, 98.8; BP 110/68; Pulse 72; Respirations 18 Skin: Flaking erythematous rash on the flexor surfaces of both arms Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Tender over maxillary sinuses; sclera red and slightly swollen with frequent tearing; outer nares with red, irritated skin; internal nares with red, boggy, moist mucosa and one medium-sized polyp on each side; pharynx slightly erythematous, with clear postnasal drainage Lungs: Clear to auscultation and percussion Discussion Questions: 1. Provide three differential diagnoses based on Janet’s subjective and objective data and discuss your reasoning for each. 2. What additional history questions would be useful in your evaluation of Janet? 3. Discuss the pathophysiological process of your primary diagnosis. 4. Differentiate the types of hypersensitivity mechanisms. 5. As per your analysis, what type of hypersensitivity reaction is Janet experiencing?
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    Three differential diagnoses with the reasoning for each.
  2. 02
    Additional history questions that would be useful in evaluating Janet.
  3. 03
    The pathophysiological process of the primary diagnosis.
  4. 04
    A differentiation of the types of hypersensitivity mechanisms.
  5. 05
    The hypersensitivity type Janet is experiencing, with justification.
03

Five questions, answered in the order asked

01

What Janet's history and exam establish

Pull the atopic findings together before naming any diagnosis.

02

Three differential diagnoses

Give allergic rhinitis with polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis and non-allergic rhinitis, each argued.

03

Additional history to gather

Ask what the polyps, the cough and the exposure history make necessary.

04

Pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis

Trace sensitisation, IgE binding, mast cell degranulation and the late-phase response.

05

The four hypersensitivity mechanisms

Set types I to IV against each other by mediator, timing and example.

06

Janet's hypersensitivity type

Name type I and justify it from her presentation.

04

Where each hypersensitivity mechanism is defined

Recommended databases

  • StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
  • PubMed
  • CINAHL
  • An immunology text for the Gell and Coombs classification

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Confirm the diagnostic features of allergic rhinitis and how polyps change management.
  2. 2.
    Read what nasal polyps in a young adult should prompt you to exclude.
  3. 3.
    Write the four hypersensitivity types into a table with mediator, timing and example.
  4. 4.
    Find the evidence for the late-phase response, which most answers omit.
  5. 5.
    Check whether atopic dermatitis is described as having a delayed component.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Allergic Rhinitis

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Diagnostic features and pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis.

  2. 02

    Nasal Polyps

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Why polyps in a 20-year-old widen the differential and the further history.

  3. 03

    Type I Hypersensitivity Reaction

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    The mechanism behind question five, including the late-phase response.

  4. 04

    Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    The delayed mechanism needed to differentiate the four types and to discuss her dermatitis.

  5. 05

    Acute Sinusitis

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Supports sinusitis as a differential given the maxillary tenderness.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Passing over the nasal polyps, which drive both the differential and the extra history.
  • Ignoring the flexural rash, which establishes atopy before the nose is examined.
  • Answering question four with type I alone when it asks for the mechanisms differentiated.
  • Repeating question four's content as the answer to question five instead of applying it.
  • Describing allergic rhinitis without the sensitisation step that precedes the reaction.
  • Proposing history questions that the case has already answered.

Submission checklist

  • Three differentials appear, each with reasoning from Janet's data.
  • The extra history includes items prompted by the polyps specifically.
  • The pathophysiology covers sensitisation, immediate and late-phase response.
  • All four hypersensitivity types are differentiated with mediator and timing.
  • The answer to question five names type I and argues it from Janet's findings.
  • Sources are cited in APA format.

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order