Grief, its types and culture-specific attitudes
A short prompt with four separate demands packed into it, including two qualifiers most posts miss: the age of the person who died, and the cause of death.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Four demands in sixty-four words
Unpack the prompt before writing anything, because it asks for considerably more than its sixty-four words suggest. Define grief and describe its physical symptoms, its psychological and social responses and its spiritual aspects — that is four dimensions, not a general description. Summarise the types of grief. Then specify culture-specific considerations regarding attitudes toward the loss of a loved one, including age, whether a child or an older adult, and cause of death. Those last two qualifiers are the ones most posts drop, and they are the most interesting part of the question, because the cultural response to a death is not uniform within a culture: the same community may respond very differently to the death of a child, an expected death in old age, a suicide, an overdose or a homicide. Those differences are the substance of the cultural section rather than a complication of it.
For the types, use recognised terminology rather than improvising — anticipatory grief before an expected death, acute or normal grief, complicated or prolonged grief disorder which now has diagnostic criteria, disenfranchised grief where the loss is not socially acknowledged, and cumulative grief from losses in close succession. Disenfranchised grief is worth developing because it connects directly to the culture question: what a community recognises as a loss worthy of mourning determines who receives support, and a stigmatised cause of death can leave a family grieving without any of the usual scaffolding. Handle the cultural material carefully — describe practices as documented patterns rather than as rules that predict how any individual will grieve, since treating culture as prescriptive is both clinically wrong and the error a marker will look for in a nursing post, since it is the point at which cultural awareness turns into stereotyping.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Describe grief across physical, psychological, social and spiritual dimensions.
- 02Distinguish recognised types of grief, including disenfranchised and prolonged grief.
- 03Discuss cultural variation in mourning without treating culture as prescriptive.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Discussion: Death is a universal human experience ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Discussion: Death is a universal human experience
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A post of at least 500 words.
- 02A definition covering all four named dimensions.
- 03A summary of grief types using recognised terminology.
- 04Cultural considerations addressing age and cause of death, with two academic sources.
Defining grief, then typing it, then culture
Define grief across four dimensions
Cover physical symptoms, psychological and social responses, and spiritual aspects separately.
Summarise the types
Name anticipatory, acute, prolonged, disenfranchised and cumulative grief with brief distinctions.
Culture and the age of the deceased
Contrast responses to the death of a child with an expected death in old age.
Culture and cause of death
Discuss how stigmatised causes alter the support a family receives.
Guard against prescription
State that cultural patterns inform assessment but do not predict an individual's response.
Sources for grief typology and cultural practice
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- PubMed Central
- PsycINFO
- Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Your course readings on loss and bereavement
Search sequence
- 1.Check the current diagnostic status and criteria for prolonged grief disorder, which changed recently.
- 2.Search for disenfranchised grief specifically; it links the types section to the culture section.
- 3.Look for empirical studies of bereavement in specific communities rather than general cultural overviews.
- 4.Prefer sources that report variation within cultural groups, which supports the anti-prescriptive point.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
About Adverse Childhood Experiences
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2024
Includes the death of a family member among adverse experiences with measured long-term effects, which supports the developmental half of the age discussion.
- 02
Cancer statistics, 2026
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, via PubMed Central · 2026
Population data on cause of death, useful for grounding the cause-of-death discussion in what people actually die of.
- 03
About CAHPS
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
A model of measuring experience across diverse groups without assuming uniformity, which is the methodological caution this post needs.
- 04
Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · 2019
Qualitative evidence on how nurses navigate emotionally charged encounters, relevant to the practice implications of the cultural material.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Describing grief generally and missing one or more of the four named dimensions.
- Omitting the age and cause-of-death qualifiers in the cultural section.
- Improvising grief types instead of using recognised terminology.
- Presenting cultural practices as rules that predict individual behaviour.
Submission checklist
- Are all four dimensions of grief described?
- Do the types use recognised clinical terminology?
- Have you addressed both age and cause of death?
- Is culture described as pattern rather than prescription, with two academic sources?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.