Herzing NU 670 Unit 8 DQ 1: psychopharmacology reflection
Reflect on each of the NU 670 course objectives — neurotransmission, categories of psychotropic drugs, complementary medications, assessment tools, prescribing safety, patient education and legal and ethical issues — analysing how the course supported each and how it applies to practice.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
Seven objectives, and each one needs its own evidence
Read the structure before the content. This is a reflection, but it is not a free one: it lists seven course objectives and then asks two questions about every one of them — how the course supported that objective, and how the material will apply to professional practice. That means the post has a fixed shape, roughly a short paragraph per objective, and the commonest failure is one general paragraph about how much you learned. For each objective, name the specific course element that supported it: the module on receptor pharmacology, the case in which you titrated an SSRI, the assignment where you applied a rating scale, the discussion on prescribing for an older adult. A reflection is assessed on evidence of learning, and the evidence is the particular, not the sentiment. Where an objective was supported weakly, say so and say what you did about it — that is a stronger reflection than uniform praise, and it is what markers notice.
On the content, keep the pharmacology accurate because it carries the marks the reflection frame cannot. Neurotransmission is the base: synthesis, release, receptor binding and reuptake, and the fact that most psychotropics act on that cycle explains both effect and adverse effect. Organise the categories by mechanism rather than by indication — SSRIs and SNRIs, tricyclics and MAOIs, typical and atypical antipsychotics, mood stabilisers including lithium and anticonvulsants, anxiolytics, and stimulants — and attach to each a rationale, a mechanism, the side effects that stop patients taking it, and the interaction that matters most. Then handle the objectives that are easy to skate over: complementary medicines are really a serotonin-syndrome and drug-interaction question, cultural and genetic factors mean pharmacogenomic variation in metabolism as well as differing family beliefs about taking medication at all, and the legal and ethical objective means scope of practice, controlled-substance authority, capacity and informed consent rather than a general remark about ethics.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Analyse each course objective separately rather than reflecting in general.
- 02Evidence each claim of learning with a specific course element.
- 03Organise psychotropic categories by mechanism, rationale, adverse effects and interactions.
- 04Apply the objectives to prescribing decisions in professional practice.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. Herzing NU 670 Unit 8 DQ 1 One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An analysis of how the course supported each of the seven objectives.
- 02An explanation of how the material applies to professional practice.
- 03Fundamentals of neurotransmission as they relate to prescribing.
- 04Major psychotropic categories with rationale, mechanism, side effects and interactions.
- 05Complementary and alternative medication use, with cultural and genetic considerations.
- 06Clinical assessment tools, patient education and the legal and ethical objectives.
Working objective by objective
How to read a multi-objective reflection
Set the structure: two questions asked of each of seven objectives.
Neurotransmission as the base
Synthesis, release, binding, reuptake, and why adverse effects follow the same cycle.
Categories of psychotropic drugs
Antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, anxiolytics, stimulants.
Complementary medicines and patient factors
Interaction risk, pharmacogenomics, cultural beliefs about medication.
Assessment tools and patient education
Rating scales in diagnosis and monitoring; what the patient and family are told.
Legal, ethical and professional application
Scope, prescriptive authority, consent, and how each objective reaches your practice.
What to cite for each drug class and safety claim
Recommended databases
- StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf
- PubMed Central
- FDA drug labels
- Cochrane Library
Search sequence
- 1.Read the overview entries for antidepressants and antipsychotics for mechanism and adverse effects.
- 2.Find one review on adverse effects that drive non-adherence.
- 3.Check current evidence for a complementary agent and its interaction profile.
- 4.Note the pharmacogenomic variation relevant to at least one class.
- 5.Match each objective to one citable source before writing.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Antidepressants
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Mechanism, classes and interactions for the antidepressant objective.
- 02
Antipsychotic Medications
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Typical versus atypical agents, receptor targets and monitoring requirements.
- 03
Sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressants and antipsychotics: a structured narrative review
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology · 2026
An adverse effect that drives non-adherence, for the patient-education objective.
- 04
Antidepressants versus placebo for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2025
Evidence for rationale-for-use, rather than asserting efficacy.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Writing one general reflection instead of addressing each objective.
- Describing feelings about the course rather than evidence of learning.
- Organising drug categories by diagnosis, which hides the shared mechanisms.
- Omitting the complementary-medicine objective because it feels peripheral.
- Treating cultural and genetic factors as one sentence about diversity.
- Skipping the legal and ethical objective, which carries its own marks.
Submission checklist
- Every one of the seven objectives is addressed by name.
- Each has a specific course element attached as evidence.
- Each has a professional-practice application stated.
- Drug categories include mechanism and interaction, not just indications.
- Pharmacogenomic and cultural factors are addressed concretely.
- Examples and full explanations are supported by citations.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.