Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
Information TechnologyPresentationHealth informatics

HIT strategic plan: seven components for your company

In a 12-15 slide presentation with detailed speaker notes or a paper of at least 800 words, develop a health information technology strategic plan for your own organisation covering corporate goals, HIT goals, applications portfolio priorities, architecture and infrastructure, software development, management and staffing, and resource requirements.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 13, 2026

01

Why the HIT goals have to derive from the corporate ones

The seven components are listed in a deliberate order and the first two carry the whole plan. A statement of corporate goals comes before a statement of HIT goals because a strategic technology plan is one that serves the organisation's stated direction; if your HIT goals could be lifted into any other company's plan unchanged, they are a wish list rather than a strategy. So write the corporate goals first, concretely and for a real organisation you can describe, and then derive each HIT goal from a specific corporate one. If a corporate goal is to reduce readmissions, the HIT goal is the analytics and care-transition capability that supports it. That traceability is also what makes the third component answerable, because priorities for the applications portfolio are decided by which corporate goal each application serves and how urgently, rather than by which system is oldest or which department asked most loudly for attention.

The middle components are where vagueness usually creeps in, so be concrete. Architecture and infrastructure means naming the shape of the estate — hosting model, the core clinical or operational systems, integration approach, the interoperability standards you will require of vendors, network and security posture — rather than saying the infrastructure will be robust and scalable. The software development plan should say what you build versus buy and why, and what governs releases. Management and staffing should give a structure with roles and reporting, not a headcount. Resource requirements should carry actual figures across capital and operating, and should be consistent with the staffing plan you just described. Whichever format you choose, the requirement to reference a minimum of five peer- reviewed or scholarly articles applies, so pick the presentation only if you are willing to put substance into the speaker notes, which is where the citations will have to live.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Derive technology goals from an organisation's stated strategic direction.
  • 02
    Prioritise an applications portfolio against business objectives.
  • 03
    Specify a health IT architecture including integration and interoperability requirements.
  • 04
    Distinguish build from buy decisions in a software development plan.
  • 05
    Align staffing structure with stated resource requirements.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Design a 12 – 15 slide presentation with detailed speaker notes; OR Write a paper with a minimum of 800 words Develop a HIT Strategic Plan for your own company. Address the following components: Provide a statement of corporate/ institutional goals and objectives; Provide a statement of HIT goals and objectives; Discuss priorities for the applications portfolio; Include the specifications of overall HIT architecture and infrastructure; Include a software development plan; Include a HIT management and staffing plan; and Include a statement of resource requirements. Reference your readings and include a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar articles.
02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    A statement of corporate or institutional goals and objectives.
  2. 02
    A statement of HIT goals and objectives derived from them.
  3. 03
    Priorities for the applications portfolio.
  4. 04
    Specifications of overall HIT architecture and infrastructure, plus a software development plan.
  5. 05
    A HIT management and staffing plan and a statement of resource requirements.
03

Goals, portfolio, architecture, build, people, money

01

Corporate goals and objectives

The organisation described concretely, with goals a technology plan could serve.

02

HIT goals derived from them

Each technology objective traced to a named corporate objective.

03

Applications portfolio priorities

Which systems come first and on what basis they were ranked.

04

Architecture and infrastructure

Hosting, core systems, integration, interoperability standards and security posture.

05

Software development plan

Build versus buy, release governance and lifecycle management.

06

Management, staffing and resources

Roles and reporting lines, with capital and operating figures that match them.

04

HIT planning frameworks and interoperability standards

Recommended databases

  • HealthIT.gov
  • StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
  • AHRQ digital healthcare research
  • PubMed
  • Course text on health information systems

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Read federal guidance on health IT strategy and interoperability requirements.
  2. 2.
    Read on applications portfolio management and how priorities are set.
  3. 3.
    Identify current interoperability standards a vendor requirement could name.
  4. 4.
    Read on health IT governance structures and typical role definitions.
  5. 5.
    Find peer-reviewed evaluations of health IT implementations for the five sources.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Interoperability

    HealthIT.gov, Office of the National Coordinator · 2024

    The standards an architecture section must name rather than gesture at.

  2. 02

    Health IT Playbook

    HealthIT.gov, Office of the National Coordinator · 2024

    Practical planning guidance covering governance, selection and implementation.

  3. 03

    Health Information Technology

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024

    The clinical systems that anchor most applications portfolios, with their known implementation issues.

  4. 04

    Privacy, Security, and HIPAA

    HealthIT.gov, Office of the National Coordinator · 2024

    The security posture requirements that belong in the infrastructure specification.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Writing HIT goals that could belong to any organisation, with no link to the corporate goals.
  • Listing applications without prioritising them or saying what the priority is based on.
  • Describing architecture in adjectives rather than in named systems and standards.
  • Omitting the build-versus-buy decision from the software development plan.
  • Giving a headcount instead of a management structure with roles.
  • Stating resource requirements that do not reconcile with the staffing plan.

Submission checklist

  • All seven listed components are present and labelled.
  • Each HIT goal traces to a corporate goal.
  • The applications portfolio is ranked with a stated basis.
  • Interoperability standards and integration approach are named.
  • Resource figures are consistent with the staffing plan.
  • At least five peer-reviewed or scholarly articles are referenced.

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order