HLT 308V Topic 5 DQ 1 health care reform discussion
After viewing the assigned video on the future of health care, describe two key reform factors future health care workers or leaders will need to address and explain why, then say what role adherence to managed care organisation standards plays in your future vision.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
Two factors, argued, and then the MCO clause
The instruction says two, and choosing two is itself the argument. Health care organisations face pressure from regulators and government agencies while simultaneously being bound by managed care organisation standards, and the factors worth choosing are the ones where those two pressures meet. Workforce is the strongest candidate: shortages, ageing among practising nurses, and the burnout that follows determine whether any other reform can be staffed. Cost and payment reform is the second, since the movement from volume to value changes what an organisation is paid for and therefore what it measures and rewards. Access and health equity, the shift of care out of hospitals and into homes and clinics, and the regulatory load of quality reporting are all defensible alternatives. Pick two, say why each will land on the workers and leaders rather than on the system in the abstract, and the post has done what the prompt asked.
The final clause is a separate question and it is where thin posts stop. Managed care organisation standards are not general guidance about efficiency. They are specific requirements attached to payment: utilisation review and prior authorisation, network adequacy, credentialing, quality reporting through standardised measure sets, and the contractual terms that determine whether care delivered is care reimbursed. Adherence therefore shapes daily practice — which referral needs approval, which measure gets chased at the end of a quarter, which documentation is required before a claim is paid. Say what role that plays in your own vision honestly: it can align an organisation with evidence-based practice where the measures are well chosen, and it can distort priorities towards what is counted where they are not. A post that treats standards as either pure quality assurance or pure obstruction has missed the tension the prompt is pointing at.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Select and justify two health reform factors rather than surveying many.
- 02Explain reform pressures in terms of their effect on workers and leaders.
- 03Describe what managed care organisation standards actually require.
- 04Relate payment and reporting requirements to daily clinical decisions.
- 05Evaluate standards as both an alignment mechanism and a distortion risk.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. HLT 308V Topic 5 DQ 1 I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Two reform factors, named and explained.
- 02A reason each will need to be addressed by workers or leaders specifically.
- 03An account of what adherence to MCO standards involves.
- 04A position on the role of those standards in your future vision.
- 05Reference to the assigned video and to cited sources.
The video, two factors, then managed care
What the video sets up
Summarise the challenge the assigned video frames.
Factor one, and why it lands on people
Name the first reform factor and its effect on workers and leaders.
Factor two, and why it lands on people
Name the second factor and defend the choice against alternatives.
What MCO standards require
Set out utilisation review, network adequacy, credentialing and measures.
Their role in your vision
Take a position on alignment against distortion.
What managed care standards actually require
Recommended databases
- StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
- KFF
- PubMed
- The assigned course video
Search sequence
- 1.Watch the video and note the challenges it names before choosing factors.
- 2.Read what a managed care organisation is contractually required to do.
- 3.Find current workforce data if workforce is one of your two factors.
- 4.Look up how quality measures are tied to payment.
- 5.Draft the MCO paragraph first, since it is the one most often cut short.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Managed Care Organization
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Defines what a managed care organisation is and the standards it operates under.
- 02
Managed Care Economics
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Explains the payment mechanisms that make adherence a practical constraint.
- 03
Managed Care Marketing
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2024
Federal requirements applying to managed care plans, as a source for the standards claim.
- 04
10 Things to Know About Medicaid Managed Care
KFF · 2024
Current data on managed care reach and network adequacy for the reform argument.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing several reform issues instead of choosing and defending two.
- Describing reform at system level with nothing that reaches a worker or leader.
- Treating MCO standards as generic quality guidance.
- Answering the MCO clause with a sentence after a long first section.
- Presenting standards as purely obstructive or purely beneficial.
- Ignoring the video the prompt directs you to watch.
Submission checklist
- Exactly two factors are named and each is justified.
- Each factor is connected to what workers or leaders will have to do.
- MCO standards are described with specifics such as utilisation review or network adequacy.
- The role of adherence is stated as a position, not a summary.
- The video is referenced.
- Sources are cited in the required format.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.