Mental illness vs mental disorder Adam Lanza paper
Write a three-page paper comparing three similarities and three differences between mental illnesses and mental disorders, speculating on violent video games as a stressor in the Adam Lanza case and on his treatability, suggesting a preventive action, and differentiating functional disorders, neuroses and manic-depressive behaviour.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
A terminology question wearing a case study
The first task is the one that decides the grade and it is a terminology question. In current clinical usage mental illness and mental disorder are close to interchangeable, with disorder the term diagnostic manuals actually use and illness the term that survives in law, policy and ordinary speech. So the honest structure is to say that, then draw the three similarities from what both terms denote — a condition affecting cognition, emotion or behaviour, associated with distress or impairment, and diagnosed against criteria rather than by observation of oddness — and draw the three differences from usage rather than from substance: which term appears in a manual against which appears in statute, the breadth each covers in common use, and the connotation illness carries towards severity and towards a medical model. Every one of the six needs its own example, which the brief specifies, so build them as you go.
The Lanza sections need discipline of a different kind, because the brief invites speculation and speculation still has to be evidence-bound. On violent video games, the responsible answer reports what the research base actually supports: the evidence for a causal link to mass violence is weak and contested, and official reviews of that shooting emphasised a long history of untreated and under-treated conditions, profound social withdrawal and access to firearms rather than gaming. Say what you think, but say it against the evidence. The treatability question is answerable from the record — he had been assessed and diagnosed years earlier, and treatment recommendations were not followed — which makes the preventive action question concrete: continuity of care, engaging families in follow-up, and the transition point where paediatric services end. The final classification section is straightforward definitional work, and criticising the notion that one disorder is more severe than another is easiest if you argue from impairment rather than from label.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Distinguish clinical and lay usage of mental illness and mental disorder.
- 02Support each comparison with a specific illustrative example.
- 03Evaluate a claimed causal link against the strength of the research base.
- 04Identify continuity of care as a preventive mechanism rather than a slogan.
- 05Differentiate functional disorders, neuroses and mood disorders by criteria.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Three similarities between mental illnesses and mental disorders, each with an example.
- 02Three differences, each with an example.
- 03A reasoned position on violent video games as a stressor in this case.
- 04A judgement on whether Lanza would have been a good candidate for treatment.
- 05One preventive action psychologists could have suggested.
- 06A differentiation of functional disorders, neuroses and manic-depressive behaviour.
- 07At least three quality academic sources, APA formatted.
Definitions, the case, prevention, then classification
What each term denotes
Establish clinical and lay usage before comparing.
Three similarities, with examples
Set out shared features and illustrate each.
Three differences, with examples
Draw differences from usage, breadth and connotation.
The case, weighed against evidence
Address stressors, treatability and what the record shows.
Prevention and classification
Propose a preventive action and differentiate the three categories.
Clinical sources for a criminal justice paper
Recommended databases
- National Institute of Mental Health
- StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
- PsycINFO
- The two articles supplied with the assignment
- PubMed
Search sequence
- 1.Read both supplied articles and note what is documented against what is inferred.
- 2.Find how a current diagnostic manual defines mental disorder.
- 3.Search for reviews of the video game and violence literature, not single studies.
- 4.Look up the historical meaning of neurosis before comparing it to current terms.
- 5.Draft all six comparisons with examples before writing the case sections.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Mental Illness
National Institute of Mental Health · 2024
Official definitions and prevalence data, and the terminology the government itself uses.
- 02
Psychosis
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
Clinical account of psychotic illness, for the functional disorder classification.
- 03
Delusional Disorder
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
A worked example of a disorder defined by criteria rather than by severity.
- 04
Adolescent Mental Health
World Health Organization · 2024
Evidence on early diagnosis and continuity of care, which the prevention question turns on.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Inventing a substantive clinical distinction where usage is the real difference.
- Giving six comparisons without the examples the brief requires for each.
- Asserting that violent games cause mass violence without engaging the evidence.
- Treating the case as a morality argument rather than a clinical one.
- Proposing prevention that no psychologist could have initiated.
- Using Wikipedia or similar sites, which the brief excludes explicitly.
Submission checklist
- Three similarities and three differences are each supported by an example.
- The usage distinction between clinical and legal language is stated.
- The video game claim is weighed against research rather than asserted.
- The preventive suggestion is something a clinician could act on.
- All three classification terms are defined and compared.
- At least three academic sources are cited and formatted to APA.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.