MN504 collaboration for research and EBP guide
An MN504 Unit 9 discussion post of at least 200 words with three references: discuss the advanced practice nurse's role as an interdisciplinary research collaborator obliged to co-participate in implementing evidence-based practice, then close with an example of an evidence-based change requiring nursing and at least two other disciplines.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 12, 2026
Why does the prompt say 'obligated'?
The word carrying the weight in the first question is obligated. The prompt does not ask whether advanced practice nurses can collaborate in research; it treats co-participation as a professional obligation and asks you to discuss the role that follows from it. So the strong answer says where the obligation comes from — the scope and standards of advanced practice, the accountability that comes with prescriptive and diagnostic authority, and the simple fact that a practice change nurses will carry out but did not help design usually fails at the bedside. Notice too that the question spans the whole cycle: completing research and using research findings. The APRN appears at both ends, as someone who helps generate evidence and as the person who decides whether it survives contact with a real unit. Covering only the second half is the commonest way this post comes back marked as incomplete, because the prompt names both.
The two required readings are doing specific work, so use them rather than nodding at them. The Women's Health Initiative is the obvious illustration of scale: a study large enough to change practice for millions, run by teams that were never one discipline, whose findings on hormone therapy reversed a widely accepted standard of care, and did so slowly, because reversing an established practice takes translation as well as evidence. That is a concrete answer to why collaboration matters at the research end, and it is more persuasive than any general claim about teamwork because it names a study, a finding and a consequence. The collaborative strategies article then supplies the mechanisms at the practice end: the structures, roles and supports that let clinical nurses take part in research rather than merely receive its conclusions, and those mechanisms are what you should be citing when you describe the role.
The closing example is graded separately and has three explicit constraints: it must be an evidence-based change, it must require nursing plus at least two other disciplines, and it must lead to quality improvement. Choose something where the other disciplines are genuinely necessary rather than decorative, which rules out most examples that begin with educating staff. A sepsis recognition bundle needs nursing for screening, laboratory for turnaround, pharmacy for antibiotic availability and medicine for the order set. A safe opioid tapering protocol needs nursing, pharmacy, physical therapy and behavioural health. A falls reduction programme needs nursing, physical therapy and environmental services. For whichever you pick, name the discipline, say what it contributes that nobody else can, and name the quality measure that would show the change worked. That last detail is what makes it an evidence-based change rather than a good idea, and it is the difference the rubric is written to detect.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Ground the collaboration obligation in scope, standards and accountability.
- 02Describe the APRN's role at both the research and the implementation ends of the cycle.
- 03Use the Women's Health Initiative as evidence rather than as an aside.
- 04Choose an example where two other disciplines are genuinely necessary.
- 05Attach a quality measure to the proposed change.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation Hi Class, Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts. Contact me if you have any questions. Important information on Writing a Discussion Question Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references) There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article. Include in-text citations in your response Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information Follow APA-7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week. Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references) Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count. Follow APA 7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points. Here are some helpful links Student paper example Citing Sources The Writing Center is a great resource Welcome to class Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to. I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you. Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted. If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations. Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements. Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week. I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A discussion of the APRN as interdisciplinary research collaborator, at least 200 words.
- 02An example of an evidence-based change requiring nursing and at least two other disciplines.
- 03A stated link from the change to quality improvement.
- 04Three references, APA formatted, published within about five years.
What makes the closing example count?
Where the obligation comes from
Scope and standards of advanced practice, accountability, and the practical failure of changes designed without the people who deliver them.
The APRN in generating evidence
Question identification, protocol feasibility, recruitment, data quality, and translating clinical reality into study design.
The APRN in implementing evidence
Appraisal, adaptation to local context, staff education, and measurement after the change.
The example
One evidence-based change with nursing and two other disciplines, each contributing something only they can, and a quality measure.
How should the two assigned readings be used?
Recommended databases
- NHLBI
- NCBI Bookshelf
- AHRQ
- CINAHL
Search sequence
- 1.Read the Women's Health Initiative overview and note one specific finding that changed practice.
- 2.Read the assigned collaborative strategies article for the mechanisms, not just the conclusion.
- 3.Choose the example before drafting, since it constrains which disciplines you discuss.
- 4.Find the quality measure that corresponds to your example so the last sentence has a number in it.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Women's Health Initiative (WHI)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH · 2024
The assigned reading: scale, multidisciplinary design, and findings that reversed an accepted standard of care.
- 02
COLLABORATION WITHIN THE INTERPROFESSIONAL TEAM
Nursing Management and Professional Concepts, NCBI Bookshelf · 2022
What each discipline contributes, which the closing example depends on.
- 03
TeamSTEPPS 3.0
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
A named framework for how interdisciplinary collaboration is actually structured and taught.
- 04
Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice
American Nurses Association · 2024
The professional basis for treating research participation as an obligation rather than an option.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Arguing that collaboration is beneficial rather than explaining why it is obligatory.
- Covering implementation only, and ignoring the APRN's role in generating evidence.
- Mentioning the Women's Health Initiative without saying what it demonstrates.
- Naming an example where the other disciplines add nothing specific.
- Omitting the quality measure, so the change cannot be evaluated.
- Falling short of the word count or the three-reference requirement.
Submission checklist
- The source of the collaboration obligation named explicitly.
- Both ends of the research cycle addressed.
- The Women's Health Initiative used as a worked illustration.
- An example naming three disciplines with distinct contributions.
- A named quality measure attached to the change.
- At least 200 words, three APA references within five years.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.