Nervous system memo: using five terms precisely
The memo is a container. What is graded is whether a reader can tell you know each of your five words exactly — which means using them where a near-synonym would be wrong.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
The memo is a vehicle for demonstrating vocabulary
The instruction that decides the grade is the second one: use the words so that it is clear to the reader that you know the exact meaning of each. That rules out the obvious strategy of dropping five terms into sentences where any related word would fit. A word is demonstrated when it is used in a context that only that word suits — precentral, for instance, is demonstrated when it appears in a sentence about motor function, because the precentral gyrus is the primary motor cortex and postcentral is sensory, so swapping them would make the sentence false. Contralateral is demonstrated when the sentence describes a deficit on the opposite side to the lesion. Choose your five to be mutually supporting rather than scattered, since a coherent cluster makes the demonstration easier and the memo readable. Five words is few enough that each one has to earn its sentence.
Two clusters work particularly well. A neurological one: precentral, postcentral, contralateral, cerebellum and encephalon lets you write about a stroke or head injury and distinguish motor from sensory cortex, ipsilateral cerebellar signs from contralateral cortical ones. An ophthalmological one: iris, optic, ophthalmoscope, myopia and blepharitis supports a memo about a vision screening programme. Whichever you take, hold the distinctions that are easy to blur — neurosis and psychosis differ on contact with reality, not on severity; congenital means present at birth and is not a synonym for hereditary; bifida in spina bifida denotes the failure of the vertebral arch to close rather than the neural tissue itself. Then write the memo as a memo: an official addressing a colleague, with a subject line, a reason for writing and a request or recommendation, at least 350 words. A block of definitions with a greeting attached will not read as one, and the format is part of what was asked for.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Demonstrate a term's meaning through context rather than through definition.
- 02Select mutually supporting terms rather than scattered ones.
- 03Hold the distinctions between commonly confused clinical terms.
- 04Write in memo format for a named professional audience.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation Hi Class, Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts. Contact me if you have any questions. Important information on Writing a Discussion Question Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references) There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article. Include in-text citations in your response Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information Follow APA-7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week. Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references) Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count. Follow APA 7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points. Here are some helpful links Student paper example Citing Sources The Writing Center is a great resource Welcome to class Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to. I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you. Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted. If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations. Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements. Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week. I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A memo of at least 350 words to a fictional colleague.
- 02Exactly five terms from the supplied list, used in context.
- 03Usage that demonstrates exact meaning rather than approximate familiarity.
- 04Proper memo structure with a subject, purpose and recommendation.
- 05Original work, as the instruction requires.
Pick five words, then build a scenario that needs them
Choose a coherent cluster
Select five terms that belong to one clinical scenario.
Build the scenario
Construct a plausible situation an official would write to a colleague about.
Demonstrate each term
Use each word where only that word would be correct.
Guard the confusable pairs
Handle precentral and postcentral, neurosis and psychosis, congenital and hereditary.
Write it as a memo
Supply the subject line, purpose, body and recommendation within the word count.
Getting the exact meanings right
Recommended databases
- NCBI Bookshelf (StatPearls)
- Your anatomy and physiology text
- A medical dictionary
- PubMed Central for usage in context
Search sequence
- 1.Look up each candidate term's exact definition before choosing your five, not after.
- 2.Check the confusable pairs specifically, since those are where marks are lost.
- 3.Read one clinical case description using your chosen cluster, to see the terms used naturally.
- 4.Confirm the memo format your course expects before writing.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Concussion
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Neurological terminology used in a real clinical context, which is the model for demonstrating rather than defining.
- 02
Glasgow Coma Scale
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Precise use of neurological assessment vocabulary, useful for the motor and sensory distinctions.
- 03
Major Depressive Disorder
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Correct usage of psychiatric terms, relevant if neurosis or psychosis is among your five.
- 04
CDC's Developmental Milestones
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2024
Developmental context for congenital conditions, which guards the congenital-versus-hereditary distinction.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Defining the terms rather than using them, which the instruction rules out.
- Choosing five unrelated words, which makes a coherent memo impossible.
- Confusing precentral with postcentral, or neurosis with psychosis by severity.
- Treating congenital as a synonym for hereditary.
- Writing an essay with a greeting instead of a memo.
Submission checklist
- Are exactly five terms from the list used?
- Would a near-synonym make any of your sentences wrong?
- Do the five terms support one coherent scenario?
- Is the memo at least 350 words and formatted as a memo?
- Have you checked each term's exact meaning rather than assuming it?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.