NR 507 Week 2: cystic fibrosis and post-viral cough
Part one hides a question about race and medicine that most posts answer badly — ancestry shifts the prior probability, it does not remove a diagnosis, and saying that clearly is the difference between a good post and a careless one.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Two respiratory cases, two different traps
Part one's findings are close to pathognomonic once you read them together: an infant who is small for age with a huge appetite, foul-smelling greasy stools, wheeze and cough is describing malabsorption plus airway disease, which is cystic fibrosis until proven otherwise. The prompt still wants three differentials with the weaknesses of each, so build them honestly — coeliac disease explains the steatorrhoea and failure to thrive but not the wheeze and is unusual before gluten exposure; Shwachman-Diamond syndrome gives pancreatic insufficiency but typically with neutropenia; a primary immunodeficiency or primary ciliary dyskinesia explains recurrent respiratory infection but not the fat malabsorption. Naming the weakness is half the mark. For testing, the sweat chloride test is the answer, with CFTR genotyping alongside it and faecal elastase to confirm pancreatic insufficiency; note that newborn screening may already have flagged this, and say what a negative newborn screen would and would not rule out in a child who now looks like this.
The age-of-onset question has a genotype answer. Later presentation usually means residual CFTR function — class IV or V mutations that produce a channel which conducts poorly rather than one that never reaches the membrane — so the phenotype is milder and the pancreas is often spared. Then the ancestry question, which is the one to handle carefully. Cystic fibrosis is less common in people of African ancestry, so the prior probability falls and you would weight alternatives more heavily; it does not fall to zero, the disease occurs in every population, and the mutation spectrum differs enough that a panel testing only common European variants can miss it. Say all three things. Part two is Tammy: three weeks of deep productive cough after a cold, no fever, no rhinorrhoea now. Acute bronchitis leads, with pertussis, post-nasal drip and cough-variant asthma as the differentials that matter, and green sputum is not evidence of bacterial infection.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Construct a differential in which each candidate is paired with the finding it fails to explain.
- 02Connect CFTR mutation class to age of onset and disease severity.
- 03Reason about ancestry as a modifier of prior probability rather than as a rule-out.
- 04Distinguish post-viral bronchitis from the causes of chronic cough that require different management.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Three or more differentials for part one, each with a stated weakness.
- 02An explanation of the onset-severity relationship at genotype level.
- 03A named diagnostic test pathway.
- 04An explicit, careful answer to the ancestry question.
- 05A differential, reasoning and plan for part two, with APA citations throughout.
Differentials, weaknesses, tests, then the ancestry question
Build the infant differential
Give three or more candidates and pair each with the finding it cannot explain.
Genotype and age of onset
Explain residual CFTR function and mutation class as the reason later presentation is milder.
The diagnostic pathway
Name sweat chloride testing, genotyping and faecal elastase, and note newborn screening.
Ancestry and prior probability
State that incidence differs, that the diagnosis is not excluded, and that mutation panels may under-detect.
Tammy's post-viral cough
Diagnose acute bronchitis, give the differentials that change management, and address sputum colour.
Sources for CFTR genetics and post-viral cough
Recommended databases
- NCBI Bookshelf (StatPearls)
- PubMed Central
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- CINAHL
Search sequence
- 1.Fix the CFTR mutation classes before writing the onset question — the answer depends on knowing what each class does to the protein.
- 2.Search for cystic fibrosis incidence and mutation spectrum by ancestry, so the fourth question rests on data rather than on impression.
- 3.Confirm current guidance on antibiotics in acute bronchitis, since the sputum-colour point needs a citable source.
- 4.Look up adult pertussis presentation, which is easy to miss and is the differential with the biggest consequence.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Cystic Fibrosis
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Pathophysiology, mutation classes and the diagnostic pathway, which carries the first three questions of part one.
- 02
Cystic Fibrosis - What Is Cystic Fibrosis?
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute · 2024
An institute-level summary useful for incidence and for the plain-language framing of the ancestry answer.
- 03
Acute Bronchitis
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Diagnosis and management of acute bronchitis, including why sputum colour does not indicate bacterial infection.
- 04
Antimicrobial resistance
World Health Organization · 2023
Supports the argument against reflexive antibiotics in part two with the population-level consequence.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing differentials without stating what each one fails to account for, which the prompt asks for by name.
- Answering the ancestry question with either 'no, race is irrelevant' or 'yes, it rules it out' — both are wrong.
- Explaining later onset by environment when the question is about residual channel function.
- Treating green sputum in part two as evidence for antibiotics.
- Forgetting pertussis in an adult with a three-week paroxysmal cough.
Submission checklist
- Does every differential come with its weakness?
- Have you named the sweat chloride test and said what confirms pancreatic insufficiency?
- Is the ancestry answer nuanced — lower prior, not exclusion, plus the panel-coverage point?
- Did you include pertussis in Tammy's differential?
- Are both parts supported by scholarly citations in APA format?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.