NU625 Unit 3 DQ 1: the APN as advocate and change agent
Analyse the roles, patient empowerment and values needed to be an effective nurse advocate and policy player, discuss the APN role as a change agent with an example, address how the role is implemented at organisational, state and national level, and give your view on whether advocacy works given the limited evidence base.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
Advocacy at three levels, and an honest answer about the evidence
There are five things asked here, and the one that decides the grade is the last. Take the first parts in order. The roles and values of an effective advocate can be named rather than gestured at: clinical credibility, because nobody is persuaded by an advocate who cannot describe the practice; the capacity to translate a clinical problem into a policy question a legislator can act on; coalition-building; and the willingness to accept professional risk when the advocacy is unwelcome. The values are the ethical principles the code already names — autonomy, beneficence and justice — with justice doing most of the work when advocacy is about access. Patient empowerment belongs here too, and it is a distinct idea: an advocate who speaks for a patient has not necessarily empowered them, and health literacy, shared decision-making and self-management support are the things that actually change that.
Then handle the three levels separately, because they use different instruments. Organisationally, an APN changes a protocol, sits on a shared-governance or ethics committee, escalates a safety concern, or redesigns a service. At state level the instruments are the board of nursing, the state nurses association, scope-of-practice legislation, testimony and rulemaking comment. Nationally they are professional-organisation policy work, federal comment periods, and reimbursement rules. Give one real example with an outcome. Finally, answer the question about whether advocacy works, and do not dodge it: the honest reply is that outcome evidence for advocacy specifically is thin and mostly qualitative or case-based, while the policies advocacy produces do have measurable effects. Saying that plainly, and then citing what has been measured about the policies themselves, is a considerably stronger post than asserting that advocacy always works — and it is also the answer the prompt is inviting, since the text it refers to raises the weak evidence base itself.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Name the roles and values that make an advocate effective.
- 02Distinguish advocating for a patient from empowering them.
- 03Match advocacy instruments to organisational, state and national levels.
- 04Give an evidence-based verdict on the credibility of advocacy.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. NU625-7 Unit 3 DQ 1 One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01The roles, patient empowerment and values needed to be an effective advocate and policy player.
- 02The APN role as a change agent.
- 03An example of acting as an advocate, or of an APN doing so.
- 04How the APN role is implemented at organisational, state and national level.
- 05Your opinion on whether advocacy works, given the limited evidence base.
- 06Evidence supporting that opinion, cited in APA format.
Roles and values, an example, three levels, a verdict
What an effective advocate needs
Clinical credibility, translation skill, coalitions, willingness to take risk.
Values and patient empowerment
Autonomy, beneficence, justice; health literacy and shared decision-making.
The APN as change agent
One real example with what changed and what it cost.
Organisational level
Protocols, committees, safety escalation, service redesign.
State and national level
Boards, associations, legislation, testimony, federal comment, reimbursement.
Does advocacy work?
Weigh the thin direct evidence against the measured effects of resulting policy.
What has actually been measured about advocacy
Recommended databases
- American Nurses Association advocacy pages
- PubMed Central
- American Association of Nurse Practitioners
- State board of nursing
Search sequence
- 1.Find a scoping review of advocacy and note what outcomes it could measure.
- 2.Read one account of nurses' political advocacy and its results.
- 3.Identify a policy change with measurable downstream effects.
- 4.Check what your own state association is currently working on.
- 5.Decide your verdict before writing the final section.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Defining advocacy in public health: a scoping review to inform policy, training, and equity-oriented action
International Journal for Equity in Health · 2026
What advocacy research has actually been able to define and measure.
- 02
Legislative and Political Advocacy for Nurses
American Nurses Association · 2024
The state and national instruments available to a nurse advocate.
- 03
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Roles
StatPearls Publishing, via NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
The role definitions the advocacy question sits inside.
- 04
Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Laws and Opioid Prescribing
The Milbank Quarterly · 2021
A measured downstream effect of a policy that advocacy produced.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Treating advocacy and empowerment as the same thing.
- Describing the three levels as one undifferentiated activity.
- Giving a hypothetical example rather than a real one.
- Avoiding the question about the evidence base because it is uncomfortable.
- Claiming advocacy improves outcomes with no measurement behind it.
- Listing values with no ethical framework behind them.
Submission checklist
- Roles and values are named and justified.
- Patient empowerment is treated as distinct from advocacy.
- The change-agent role is illustrated with a real example and an outcome.
- Organisational, state and national instruments are separated.
- The evidence question is answered directly.
- The opinion is supported with evidence, in APA format.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.