Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
NursingDiscussion postDevelopmental disorders

NU674 Unit 13 DQ 1: intellectual and communication disorders

Discuss intellectual disability and communication disorders in children and adolescents, and define how you would progress with a comprehensive assessment of a child suspected of having one of these disorders.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 14, 2026

01

Two diagnoses that present the same way and are not the same

Take the two categories separately before you put them together, because the post is graded on the distinction. Intellectual disability is a deficit in both intellectual functioning and adaptive functioning — conceptual, social and practical — with onset in the developmental period, and current criteria set the level of severity by adaptive functioning rather than by an IQ number. Communication disorders are a group: language disorder, speech sound disorder, childhood-onset fluency disorder and social pragmatic communication disorder, each defined by difficulty out of proportion to the child's other abilities. The clinical problem is that they overlap and imitate one another. A child with an unrecognised expressive language disorder tests poorly on verbally mediated tasks and looks intellectually disabled; a child with intellectual disability has delayed language as one feature of a global picture. Hearing loss, autism, neglect and a second language at home all produce the same surface, so the assessment exists to tell them apart.

For the assessment, describe a sequence rather than a list, and say what each step rules in or out. Start with history: pregnancy and birth, milestones with dates rather than the parent's summary, family history of delay, seizures, regression, languages spoken at home, and the school's own observations. Then audiology first, always, because uncorrected hearing loss explains a great deal and is cheap to exclude. Then a validated developmental screen — ASQ-3, or M-CHAT-R/F when autism is in the differential — followed by the physical and neurological exam, looking for dysmorphology, growth, head circumference and neurocutaneous findings. Then referral for the assessments you cannot do yourself: standardised cognitive and adaptive testing by psychology, and a speech-language evaluation of receptive and expressive language separately. Genetic testing and lead follow the findings. Close with the school pathway, because the diagnosis only helps if it becomes an IEP.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    State the diagnostic criteria for intellectual disability, including adaptive functioning.
  • 02
    Name and distinguish the communication disorders of childhood.
  • 03
    Explain why the two categories are confused in clinic and what separates them.
  • 04
    Sequence a comprehensive assessment so each step rules something in or out.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

NU674-7 Unit 13 DQ 1 Discussion Prompt Neurocognitive disorders are characterized in children by a clinically significant deviation in normal cognitive development, some of the children get neurological disorders through their genes by parents or could be through gene mutations and this affects the development of the brain and the nervous system of the child. Discuss intellectual disability and communication disorders in children and adolescents. Define how you would progress with a comprehensive assessment of a child suspected of having any of this disorder. Support your statements with a minimum of 2 scholarly articles. Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria. Estimated time to complete: 2 hours Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts with substantive comments using the following steps: Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment. References and citations should conform to APA standards. NU674-7 Unit 13 DQ 1 Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully. Plagiarism is never acceptable – give credit when credit is due – cite your sources. Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria. Collaboration points will be forfeited if you fail to meet the response post guidelines. Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    A description of intellectual disability in children and adolescents.
  2. 02
    A description of communication disorders and their subtypes.
  3. 03
    How the two are distinguished from each other and from autism and hearing loss.
  4. 04
    A comprehensive assessment pathway, in order.
  5. 05
    The referrals and standardised testing required, and who performs them.
  6. 06
    At least two scholarly articles cited in APA format.
03

From concern to comprehensive assessment

01

Intellectual disability, defined

Intellectual and adaptive deficits, developmental onset, severity by adaptive function.

02

Communication disorders, defined

Language, speech sound, fluency and social pragmatic disorders.

03

Why they are confused

Verbally mediated testing, overlapping presentation, autism and hearing loss.

04

History and observation

Perinatal history, dated milestones, regression, languages at home, school report.

05

Screening, examination and referral

Audiology, ASQ-3 or M-CHAT-R/F, physical exam, psychology and speech-language referral.

06

After the diagnosis

Early intervention, IEP, family support and follow-up interval.

04

Criteria, screening tools and referral pathways

Recommended databases

  • StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf
  • PubMed Central
  • CDC developmental milestones
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Read the current criteria for intellectual disability, noting the adaptive-function severity anchor.
  2. 2.
    Read a review of childhood language disorders and their subtypes.
  3. 3.
    Find the recommended screening intervals and named instruments.
  4. 4.
    Check what the evidence says about differentiating language disorder from intellectual disability.
  5. 5.
    Select two scholarly articles you can cite for the assessment sequence.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Intellectual Disability

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Diagnostic criteria, adaptive-function severity levels, and aetiology.

  2. 02

    Developmental Delay

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    The assessment sequence and the referrals that follow a failed screen.

  3. 03

    Speech and Language Developmental Milestones

    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders · 2024

    The milestone baseline a delay is judged against, and when to refer for evaluation.

  4. 04

    Autism Spectrum Disorder

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    The overlapping presentation that the assessment has to exclude.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Treating communication disorder as a single diagnosis rather than a group.
  • Defining intellectual disability by IQ alone and omitting adaptive functioning.
  • Leaving hearing testing out of the assessment.
  • Listing assessments without saying what each one excludes.
  • Ignoring bilingualism, which produces the same surface as a language disorder.
  • Stopping at diagnosis with no school or early-intervention pathway.

Submission checklist

  • Adaptive functioning appears in the definition of intellectual disability.
  • At least three communication disorder subtypes are named.
  • Audiology is placed early and justified.
  • A named validated screening tool is used.
  • Referrals for cognitive, adaptive and language testing are specified.
  • Two or more scholarly sources are cited in APA format.

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order