NUR 674 Topic 1 DQ 1: AONL Competencies
The framework is named, the count is specified, and the third question ties everything to your practicum project. All three constraints are gradeable, and general reflection meets none of them.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 16, 2026
Self-assessment against a published framework, not in general
Open the competency document before writing anything, because this post is an assessment against a specific instrument rather than a reflection on leadership. The AONL nurse executive competencies are organised into domains covering communication and relationship management, knowledge of the health care environment, leadership, professionalism, and business skills — and the last of those is where most clinically strong students find their gaps. Use the framework's own vocabulary rather than paraphrasing it, since a marker checking your self-assessment will be reading the same document. For strengths, name the competency and give the evidence: not that you communicate well, but that you have led interdisciplinary rounds, or handled a family complaint through to resolution, or presented a practice change to a nursing council. Do the same for the domains you are weaker in, since a strength claimed without an instance and a weakness named without one are the same failure. The framework rewards specificity in both directions.
The prompt asks for three to five competencies you still need to work on, so give a number in that range and be honest about them. Business skills, financial management, strategic management and health care policy are the common genuine gaps for a clinician moving into leadership, and naming them is more credible than nominating something safely peripheral. Then the third question, which is the one that turns the post into coursework rather than introspection: how you plan to integrate this into developing your practicum project. Answer it operationally. If financial management is a gap and your project needs a budget, then building that budget with your preceptor is the development activity, and you should say so. Matching one named gap to one project component is worth more than a general commitment to growth across all five. Say what evidence would show the gap had closed, because a development plan with no completion criterion never completes.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Assess personal capability against a published competency framework.
- 02Evidence a claimed strength with a specific instance.
- 03Identify genuine rather than safe development gaps.
- 04Convert a competency gap into a practicum development activity.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Strengths named in the framework's own terms, each with evidence.
- 02Between three and five development competencies, as specified.
- 03An honest gap in the business or policy domains, if it applies.
- 04A named practicum project component.
- 05One gap matched explicitly to one project activity.
Strengths, three to five gaps, then the project link
The framework and its domains
Establish what the competencies cover before assessing against them.
Strengths, with evidence
Name strengths and evidence each with a specific instance.
Three to five development areas
Identify genuine gaps within the specified count.
The practicum project
Describe the project concretely enough to attach development to it.
Gap to activity
Match a competency gap to a specific project activity.
Read the competency document itself
Recommended databases
- American Organization for Nursing Leadership
- CINAHL
- PubMed Central
- Your practicum site's documentation
Search sequence
- 1.Download the competency document and work from it directly.
- 2.List instances from your own practice before deciding which strengths to claim.
- 3.Search for evidence on developing the specific competency you nominate.
- 4.Check what your practicum project actually requires before matching gaps to it.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
AONL Nurse Leader Core Competencies
American Organization for Nursing Leadership · 2024
The framework this post is assessed against — read it rather than a summary.
- 02
Nurse Leaders | AONL
American Organization for Nursing Leadership · 2025
The organisation's wider resources, including the practice context the competencies assume.
- 03
Impact of Nurse Manager Leadership Styles on Work Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review
Journal of Nursing Management · 2023
Leadership style and work engagement, for connecting a competency to an outcome.
- 04
Implementing evidence-based practice: effectiveness of a structured multifaceted mentorship programme
Journal of Advanced Nursing · 2010
Mentorship evaluated against an outcome rather than described — evidence that the relationship does measurable work.
- 05
Leadership in Nursing: Qualities & Why It Matters
American Nurses Association · 2024
A complementary account of nursing leadership, useful for placing the competencies in context.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Writing about leadership generally without opening the competency document.
- Claiming strengths with no instance behind them.
- Choosing peripheral weaknesses to avoid admitting a real one.
- Ending with a commitment to growth instead of a project activity.
Submission checklist
- Are you using the framework's own domain language?
- Is your development list between three and five items?
- Does each strength have an example attached?
- Is at least one gap tied to a specific project component?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.