Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
NursingCase studyPsychopharmacology

NURS 6630: Insomnia and Depression in an Older Adult

Three decision points, each needing a rationale and a checkpoint. Her age is the constraint that rules out the drugs that would otherwise be obvious.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 16, 2026

01

Grief, depression and insomnia in one 75-year-old

Three things are happening in this patient at once and separating them is the first clinical task. Grief following the loss of a husband of forty-one years is normal and not in itself a disorder; a major depressive episode has criteria that grief alone does not meet; and insomnia can be a symptom of either, a maintaining factor for both, and a disorder in its own right. Ten months out with worsening rather than easing symptoms points beyond uncomplicated grief, and saying why — the trajectory, not just the duration — is what the assessment section needs. Her age then constrains almost every option. Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs appear on the Beers criteria for older adults because of falls, fractures and cognitive effects; anticholinergic agents including diphenhydramine and tricyclics carry their own burden; and hyponatraemia risk with SSRIs rises with age, so it needs monitoring. Name the two you would rule out first and why her age is the reason.

Structure the answer around the three decision points the assignment asks for. Decision one is the initial choice, and the defensible move is usually an antidepressant with a sedating profile at a low starting dose plus cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia, which has better long-term evidence than any hypnotic and none of the falls risk. Say why you rejected the alternatives, because ethical prescribing means being able to show the reasoning. Decision two follows the week-four response: partial response means optimising the dose before switching, no response means reconsidering the diagnosis and the adherence before adding anything. Decision three at week eight is where augmentation or switching is decided. For each, state expected outcome, what you would actually monitor — mood scale score, sleep diary, sodium, falls, weight given her diabetes — and what would make you stop. Her metformin and sitagliptin matter too: several psychotropics affect weight and glycaemic control, and saying which shows you read the case.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Distinguish grief, major depressive disorder and insomnia disorder in an older adult.
  • 02
    Apply age-appropriate prescribing constraints including the Beers criteria.
  • 03
    Sequence three treatment decisions with explicit rationale.
  • 04
    Specify monitoring parameters and stopping conditions at each checkpoint.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Discussion NURS 6630 Treatment for a Patient With a Common Condition Discussion: NURS 6630 Treatment for a Patient With a Common Condition Insomnia is one of the most common medical conditions you will encounter as a PNP. Insomnia is a common symptom of many mental illnesses, including anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and ADHD (Abbott, 2016). Various studies have demonstrated the bidirectional relationship between insomnia and mental illness. In fact, about 50% of adults with insomnia have a mental health problem, while up to 90% of adults with depression experience sleep problems (Abbott, 2016). Due to the interconnected psychopathology, it is important that you, as the PNP, understand the importance of the effects some psychopharmacologic treatments may have on a patient’s mental health illness and their sleep patterns. Therefore, it is important that you understand and reflect on the evidence-based research in developing treatment plans to recommend proper sleep practices to your patients as well as recommend appropriate psychopharmacologic treatments for optimal health and well-being. Reference: Abbott, J. (2016). What’s the link between insomnia and mental illness? Health. https://www.sciencealert.com/what-exactly-is-the-link-between-insomnia-and-mental- illness#:~:text=Sleep%20problems%20such%20as%20insomnia%20are%20a%20common,bipolar%20disorder%2C%20and%20attention%20deficit%20hyperactivity%20disorder%20%28ADHD%29 For this Discussion, review the case Learning Resources and the case study excerpt presented. Reflect on the case study excerpt and consider the therapy approaches you might take to assess, diagnose, and treat the patient’s health needs. Case: An elderly widow who just lost her spouse. Subjective: A patient presents to your primary care office today with chief complaint of insomnia. Patient is 75 YO with PMH of DM, HTN, and MDD. Her husband of 41 years passed away 10 months ago. Since then, she states her depression has gotten worse as well as her sleep habits. The patient has no previous history of depression prior to her husband’s death. She is awake, alert, and oriented x3. Patient normally sees PCP once or twice a year. Patient denies any suicidal ideations. Patient arrived at the office today by private vehicle. Patient currently takes the following medications:  Metformin 500mg BID  Januvia 100mg daily  Losartan 100mg daily  HCTZ 25mg daily  Sertraline 100mg daily Current weight: 88 kg Current height: 64 inches Temp: 98.6 degrees F BP: 132/86 By Day 3 of Week 7 Post a response to each of the following:  List three questions you might ask the patient if she were in your office. Provide a rationale for why you might ask these questions.  Identify people in the patient’s life you would need to speak to or get feedback from to further assess the patient’s situation. Include specific questions you might ask these people and why.  Explain what, if any, physical exams, and diagnostic tests would be appropriate for the patient and how the results would be used.  List a differential diagnosis for the patient. Identify the one that you think is most likely and explain why.  List two pharmacologic agents and their dosing that would be appropriate for the patient’s antidepressant therapy based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. From a mechanism of action perspective, provide a rationale for why you might choose one agent over the other.  For the drug therapy you select, identify any contraindications to use or alterations in dosing that may need to be considered based on ethical prescribing or decision-making. Discuss why the contraindication/alteration you identify exists. That is, what would be problematic with the use of this drug in individuals based on ethical prescribing guidelines or decision-making?  Include any “check points” (i.e., follow-up data at Week 4, 8, 12, etc.), and indicate any therapeutic changes that you might make based on possible outcomes that may happen given your treatment options chosen. Read a selection of your colleagues' responses. By Day 6 of Week 7 Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days in one of the following ways:  If your colleagues’ posts influenced your understanding of these concepts, be sure to share how and why. Include additional insights you gained.  If you think your colleagues might have misunderstood these concepts, offer your alternative perspective and be sure to provide an explanation for them. Include resources to support your perspective.Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days and Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the "Post to Discussion Question" link and then select "Create Thread" to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Submission and Grading Information Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Week 7 Discussion Rubric Post by Day 3 of Week 7 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7 To Participate in this Discussion: Week 7 Discussion Week 7 Initial Post COLLAPSE
02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    An assessment separating grief, depression and insomnia.
  2. 02
    Decision one with rationale and rejected alternatives.
  3. 03
    Decision two based on the week-four response.
  4. 04
    Decision three based on the week-eight response.
  5. 05
    Monitoring parameters at each checkpoint.
  6. 06
    Attention to her existing diabetes medications.
03

Three decision points, each with its rationale and its checks

01

Separating grief, depression and insomnia

Assess against criteria and use the symptom trajectory.

02

What her age rules out

Apply prescribing constraints for older adults.

03

Decision one and its rationale

Choose an initial approach and justify it against alternatives.

04

Week four checkpoint

State expected response and the decision each outcome triggers.

05

Weeks eight and twelve

Set out the later decisions and the endpoint you are aiming for.

06

Monitoring and comorbidity

Specify what you monitor, including diabetes interactions.

04

Guidance for insomnia, late-life depression and Beers criteria

Recommended databases

  • American Academy of Sleep Medicine
  • NCBI Bookshelf
  • PubMed Central
  • Stahl's Prescriber's Guide

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Read the current insomnia guideline before choosing any hypnotic.
  2. 2.
    Check the Beers criteria entries for the drug classes you are considering.
  3. 3.
    Look up late-life depression treatment evidence specifically.
  4. 4.
    Verify interactions with metformin and sitagliptin rather than assuming there are none.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Combination treatment for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline

    Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026

    The current guideline on combination treatment for chronic insomnia in adults.

  2. 02

    Pharmacotherapy Treatment Options for Insomnia: A Primer for Clinicians

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2015

    Insomnia pharmacotherapy options with their adverse effect profiles.

  3. 03

    Residual effects of zopiclone 7.5 mg on highway driving performance in insomnia patients and healthy controls

    Psychopharmacology · 2014

    Next-day impairment from a hypnotic — the falls argument, evidenced.

  4. 04

    Major Depressive Disorder

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Major depressive disorder: criteria, course and treatment sequencing.

  5. 05

    Sertraline

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, National Library of Medicine · 2023

    An antidepressant monograph for the interaction and monitoring detail.

  6. 06

    The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

    Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing · 2024

    A validated instrument for the monitoring parameter at each checkpoint.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Treating the presentation as grief and deferring treatment despite worsening.
  • Prescribing a hypnotic that appears on the Beers criteria for older adults.
  • Giving decisions with no rationale for the options rejected.
  • Ignoring the interaction between psychotropics and her glycaemic control.

Submission checklist

  • Have you justified why this is more than uncomplicated grief?
  • Does each decision name the alternatives you rejected and why?
  • Are monitoring parameters specific and measurable?
  • Have you addressed her diabetes medications?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order