NURS 6630: Insomnia and Depression in an Older Adult
Three decision points, each needing a rationale and a checkpoint. Her age is the constraint that rules out the drugs that would otherwise be obvious.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 16, 2026
Grief, depression and insomnia in one 75-year-old
Three things are happening in this patient at once and separating them is the first clinical task. Grief following the loss of a husband of forty-one years is normal and not in itself a disorder; a major depressive episode has criteria that grief alone does not meet; and insomnia can be a symptom of either, a maintaining factor for both, and a disorder in its own right. Ten months out with worsening rather than easing symptoms points beyond uncomplicated grief, and saying why — the trajectory, not just the duration — is what the assessment section needs. Her age then constrains almost every option. Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs appear on the Beers criteria for older adults because of falls, fractures and cognitive effects; anticholinergic agents including diphenhydramine and tricyclics carry their own burden; and hyponatraemia risk with SSRIs rises with age, so it needs monitoring. Name the two you would rule out first and why her age is the reason.
Structure the answer around the three decision points the assignment asks for. Decision one is the initial choice, and the defensible move is usually an antidepressant with a sedating profile at a low starting dose plus cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia, which has better long-term evidence than any hypnotic and none of the falls risk. Say why you rejected the alternatives, because ethical prescribing means being able to show the reasoning. Decision two follows the week-four response: partial response means optimising the dose before switching, no response means reconsidering the diagnosis and the adherence before adding anything. Decision three at week eight is where augmentation or switching is decided. For each, state expected outcome, what you would actually monitor — mood scale score, sleep diary, sodium, falls, weight given her diabetes — and what would make you stop. Her metformin and sitagliptin matter too: several psychotropics affect weight and glycaemic control, and saying which shows you read the case.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Distinguish grief, major depressive disorder and insomnia disorder in an older adult.
- 02Apply age-appropriate prescribing constraints including the Beers criteria.
- 03Sequence three treatment decisions with explicit rationale.
- 04Specify monitoring parameters and stopping conditions at each checkpoint.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An assessment separating grief, depression and insomnia.
- 02Decision one with rationale and rejected alternatives.
- 03Decision two based on the week-four response.
- 04Decision three based on the week-eight response.
- 05Monitoring parameters at each checkpoint.
- 06Attention to her existing diabetes medications.
Three decision points, each with its rationale and its checks
Separating grief, depression and insomnia
Assess against criteria and use the symptom trajectory.
What her age rules out
Apply prescribing constraints for older adults.
Decision one and its rationale
Choose an initial approach and justify it against alternatives.
Week four checkpoint
State expected response and the decision each outcome triggers.
Weeks eight and twelve
Set out the later decisions and the endpoint you are aiming for.
Monitoring and comorbidity
Specify what you monitor, including diabetes interactions.
Guidance for insomnia, late-life depression and Beers criteria
Recommended databases
- American Academy of Sleep Medicine
- NCBI Bookshelf
- PubMed Central
- Stahl's Prescriber's Guide
Search sequence
- 1.Read the current insomnia guideline before choosing any hypnotic.
- 2.Check the Beers criteria entries for the drug classes you are considering.
- 3.Look up late-life depression treatment evidence specifically.
- 4.Verify interactions with metformin and sitagliptin rather than assuming there are none.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Combination treatment for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
The current guideline on combination treatment for chronic insomnia in adults.
- 02
Pharmacotherapy Treatment Options for Insomnia: A Primer for Clinicians
International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2015
Insomnia pharmacotherapy options with their adverse effect profiles.
- 03
Residual effects of zopiclone 7.5 mg on highway driving performance in insomnia patients and healthy controls
Psychopharmacology · 2014
Next-day impairment from a hypnotic — the falls argument, evidenced.
- 04
Major Depressive Disorder
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Major depressive disorder: criteria, course and treatment sequencing.
- 05
Sertraline
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, National Library of Medicine · 2023
An antidepressant monograph for the interaction and monitoring detail.
- 06
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing · 2024
A validated instrument for the monitoring parameter at each checkpoint.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Treating the presentation as grief and deferring treatment despite worsening.
- Prescribing a hypnotic that appears on the Beers criteria for older adults.
- Giving decisions with no rationale for the options rejected.
- Ignoring the interaction between psychotropics and her glycaemic control.
Submission checklist
- Have you justified why this is more than uncomplicated grief?
- Does each decision name the alternatives you rejected and why?
- Are monitoring parameters specific and measurable?
- Have you addressed her diabetes medications?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.