Nursing assessment, intervention and discharge planning
Four questions tracking the management cycle, and each says 'one' — one assessment method, one intervention. Answering with three of each dilutes what the brief asks you to justify in depth.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Four questions across the whole management cycle
The word one appears twice in this brief and it is doing real work each time: discuss one method of nursing assessment, and one nursing intervention. The instruction is plainly to go deep rather than broad, and each of the two is followed immediately by a demand for a rationale, which means naming a method is worth little without saying why that one and how it would actually be conducted in this case. Choose an assessment method that is specific and validated rather than a general commitment to assessing — a named pain scale, a falls risk tool, a functional assessment, a wound assessment framework, a mental status examination — because a validated instrument gives you something concrete to describe, something defensible to justify, and something whose findings would actually change what you do next, which is the test of whether an assessment method was worth performing.
The four questions track the management cycle in order, which is worth using as the structure: you assess, you intervene, you manage the medication regimen that supports the intervention, and you plan for the point at which the patient leaves your care. The medication management question is asking specifically about the registered nurse's role, so answer it in role terms — administration and its checks, monitoring for therapeutic effect and adverse reactions, reconciliation across transitions, patient education and assessment of the patient's capacity to self-administer, and escalation when the regimen is not working. The discharge question asks for exactly two issues, so choose two that genuinely require different disciplines to solve, and then describe the multidisciplinary plan as a set of named roles with responsibilities rather than as a general commitment to working together, which is what most answers to this question offer and what a marker has read many times already.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Select and justify one validated assessment method rather than listing several.
- 02State the registered nurse's specific role in medication management.
- 03Construct a multidisciplinary discharge plan with named roles and responsibilities.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Discussion:Method of Nursing Assessment ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01One assessment method with rationale and conduct described.
- 02One nursing intervention with rationale.
- 03The RN's role in medication management.
- 04Two discharge issues and a multidisciplinary plan, with APA citations.
Assessment and intervention through to discharge
One assessment method, justified
Name a validated method, say why it suits this problem, and describe conducting it.
One intervention that follows
Select an intervention responsive to what the assessment would reveal, with rationale.
The RN in medication management
Cover administration, monitoring, reconciliation, education and escalation.
Two discharge issues
Identify two challenges that require different disciplines to resolve.
The multidisciplinary plan
Assign named roles and responsibilities with timing and handover.
Evidence for each stage of the cycle
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- Joanna Briggs Institute
- Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario best practice guidelines
- PubMed
- Your clinical practice guidelines
Search sequence
- 1.Choose a validated assessment instrument and read its documentation so you can describe conducting it accurately.
- 2.Look for a best practice guideline covering the problem, which supplies both intervention and rationale.
- 3.Search for medication reconciliation evidence, which is the strongest limb of the RN role answer.
- 4.Find discharge planning literature naming discipline-specific roles rather than describing collaboration.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
The Impact of Education on Nursing Practice
American Association of Colleges of Nursing · 2026
Evidence connecting nursing practice to measurable patient outcomes, useful for justifying the assessment and intervention choices.
- 02
The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US nurses
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(8), 1632-1641 · 2021
Evidence on documentation and system burden, relevant to how reconciliation actually happens at transitions.
- 03
About CAHPS
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
Evidence on whether patients understand discharge instructions, which determines whether the plan survives contact with home.
- 04
Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · 2019
Qualitative evidence on nursing roles and boundaries, relevant to allocating responsibilities across a multidisciplinary team.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing several assessment methods when the brief asks for one in depth.
- Naming an intervention without a rationale connecting it to the assessment.
- Describing medication management generally rather than the RN's specific role.
- Offering a commitment to teamwork instead of a plan with named roles.
Submission checklist
- Is exactly one assessment method discussed, with how it would be conducted?
- Does the intervention follow from what the assessment would find?
- Is the medication answer framed around the RN's role specifically?
- Does the discharge plan name disciplines and their responsibilities?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.