Paediatric SOAP Discussion: Histories and Reflection
Two requirements make this different from any other SOAP note: the discrepancies between child and parent, and the reflection. Both are about the encounter, not the diagnosis.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 16, 2026
Discrepancies between child and parent are asked for explicitly
Most of this prompt is a standard SOAP structure, and two clauses are not. The first asks for discrepancies between the details the child gave and the details the parent gave, along with possible reasons — which means the assignment is treating the paediatric history as a three-party negotiation rather than a data collection exercise. Discrepancies are ordinary and informative. A child may under-report symptoms in front of a parent, or over-report to be taken seriously; a parent may not know what happens at school or with another caregiver; developmental stage limits what a child can describe about timing or quality of pain; and an adolescent will withhold anything sexual or substance-related while a parent is in the room. Naming which of those you think applies, and what you would do about it — separating them for part of the visit, asking the same question differently — is what the marker is looking for.
The clinical body then has to be disciplined. Objective means what you observed, including pertinent negatives, and the prompt specifically asks about growth, development and psychosocial issues, which are easy to skip in a symptom-focused visit and are the whole point of paediatric care. Give at least three differentials ranked by priority, and remember priority is not the same as probability — a less likely but dangerous diagnosis may rank above a common benign one, and testicular torsion sitting above epididymitis is the standard example. Justify the primary diagnosis explicitly. The plan needs pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment, alternative therapies, follow-up parameters and a rationale for all of it. Then write the reflection honestly: an 'aha' moment that names something you did not know or a question you failed to ask is worth far more than a statement that the visit went well. Say what you would ask differently next time, in the words you would use.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Treat a paediatric history as a three-party account with predictable discrepancies.
- 02Assess growth, development and psychosocial factors alongside the presenting complaint.
- 03Rank differentials by priority rather than only by probability.
- 04Write a reflection that names a specific gap in your own performance.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Subjective history from both child and parent, with discrepancies and reasons.
- 02Objective findings including pertinent negatives and developmental observations.
- 03At least three differentials ranked by priority.
- 04A justified primary diagnosis.
- 05A plan with pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic and alternative therapies plus follow-up.
- 06Reflection notes with an 'aha' moment and a change you would make.
SOAP, then the reflection the prompt separates out
Subjective: two accounts
Record the child's and the parent's histories separately.
Discrepancies and why
Name the differences and offer developmental or social explanations.
Objective findings
Report examination findings including pertinent negatives.
Differentials by priority
Give at least three, ordered by risk as well as likelihood.
Primary diagnosis and plan
Justify the diagnosis and set out diagnostics and management.
Reflection
Name the moment something became clear and what you would change.
Paediatric guidance for the differentials you rank
Recommended databases
- American Academy of Pediatrics
- NCBI Bookshelf
- PubMed Central
- The assigned Burns paediatric primary care chapters
Search sequence
- 1.Check the current AAP guidance for the condition you diagnosed.
- 2.Look up age-appropriate dosing before writing the plan.
- 3.Read the guidance on the time-critical differential in your ranking.
- 4.Use Bright Futures for the developmental and psychosocial screening expectations.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Bright Futures
American Academy of Pediatrics · 2025
The developmental and psychosocial screening framework the objective section is measured against.
- 02
The Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media
Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics · 2013
A worked paediatric guideline showing how diagnosis and management are justified together.
- 03
SOAP Notes
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
SOAP structure, for keeping subjective and objective sections clean.
- 04
Identification and Management of Eating Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics · 2021
Adolescent presentation and confidentiality — directly relevant to the discrepancies section.
- 05
Health Literacy
MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine · 2025
Family education pitched so the plan can actually be followed at home.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Presenting one merged history and never addressing discrepancies.
- Omitting growth, development and psychosocial assessment.
- Ranking differentials by likelihood alone, so a dangerous diagnosis sits last.
- Writing a reflection that praises the encounter instead of examining it.
Submission checklist
- Are discrepancies identified with a suggested reason for each?
- Have you covered growth, development and psychosocial factors?
- Does the ranking put dangerous diagnoses appropriately high?
- Does the reflection name something specific you would change?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.