Patient education for Sister Mary across departments
The phrase 'as this woman progresses from department to department' is the assignment. Education has to be sequenced across handoffs, not delivered once — and her identity shapes how, not whether.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Four departments, one patient, one identity
Two things in this short prompt determine a good answer. The first is the phrase about progressing from department to department, which makes this a question about continuity rather than a single teaching episode. Sister Mary will move between the emergency department, radiology for facial bone films, and CT, and at each transition she meets new staff who may assume someone else has already explained things. So the ideal course of patient education is sequenced: what she needs before each procedure, who is accountable for saying it, and how understanding is confirmed at handoff rather than assumed. The content itself is straightforward — what each test involves, why it is being done after a facial injury, what she will feel and hear, how long it takes, and when results will be known. None of that is difficult; the difficulty is making sure it happens once rather than three times or not at all.
The second is her identity, and the useful move is to treat it as shaping how education is delivered rather than as a separate topic. Practical considerations follow directly: modesty and gowning arrangements, and asking rather than assuming about removing a habit, veil or religious jewellery for imaging; privacy during examination; whether she would like her community or a chaplain contacted, since a woman in a religious order may have a community rather than family as her support and next of kin arrangements may differ. Ask about pregnancy status for the radiographs as you would for any patient of relevant age, because omitting a standard safety question out of assumed delicacy is an error rather than a courtesy. The general principle worth stating is that respecting her identity means asking her preferences rather than predicting them from her role, which is the difference between cultural competence and stereotyping.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Sequence patient education across departmental transitions rather than as one episode.
- 02Adapt delivery to a patient's religious identity without assuming her preferences.
- 03Maintain standard safety questioning regardless of a patient's role or status.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Discussion: Ideal course of patient education Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Discussion: Ideal course of patient education
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An education plan mapped to each department transition.
- 02Accountability for who explains what at each stage.
- 03Specific accommodations offered as questions rather than assumptions.
- 04APA-formatted citations.
Sequencing education across the whole pathway
Map the pathway
Set out the departments she will pass through and the handoffs between them.
Education before each procedure
State what she needs to know before the examination, the radiographs and the CT.
Confirming understanding at handoff
Use teach-back and hand over what has already been explained.
Accommodations, offered as questions
Address modesty, religious dress and jewellery, privacy and community contact.
Standard safety retained
Keep pregnancy screening and identification checks regardless of her role.
Radiation safety and religious accommodation
Recommended databases
- The Joint Commission communication resources
- American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria
- CINAHL
- PubMed Central
- Your course's patient education chapter
Search sequence
- 1.Look at handoff communication standards, since continuity is the core of this question.
- 2.Check radiation safety screening requirements so the standard questions are stated correctly.
- 3.Search for literature on religious accommodation in acute care rather than general cultural competence.
- 4.Find teach-back evidence to justify how understanding is confirmed at each transition.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Sentinel Event Data
The Joint Commission · 2024
National data showing communication failure among the leading contributors to serious events, which is what handoffs risk here.
- 02
About CAHPS
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
Evidence on whether patients report understanding what was explained, which is the outcome this plan targets.
- 03
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
American Psychological Association · 2017
Standards on respecting individual differences without stereotyping, which is the principle governing the accommodations.
- 04
Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: Is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter?
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, via PubMed Central · 2016
Distinguishes compassion from sympathy, useful for framing how respect is enacted rather than announced.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Treating this as one teaching episode rather than a sequence across departments.
- Assuming her preferences from her role instead of asking.
- Omitting standard safety questions, such as pregnancy status before radiographs, out of misplaced delicacy.
- Discussing religion as a separate topic rather than as something shaping delivery.
Submission checklist
- Does the plan address each department transition separately?
- Is accountability for the explanation named at each stage?
- Are accommodations framed as questions to her?
- Are standard safety checks retained?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.