Pediatric GI case studies: vomiting, reflux, encopresis
Select one of three pediatric gastrointestinal cases — acute vomiting and diarrhoea, chronic sore throat with regurgitation, or stool soiling on a background of constipation — and post a differential diagnosis, the most likely diagnosis and its unique characteristics, a treatment plan with dosages, and family education strategies.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
What each case is really presenting
The three cases sit at different points on the acute-to-chronic axis and each one hides its diagnosis behind a symptom that sounds like something else. Jordan is four, has vomited five times and passed one large watery stool, and has not vomited for five hours; the useful work is the dehydration assessment, because three hours since a small dark-yellow void in a quiet, tired child is a mild to moderate deficit, and that estimate is what decides oral rehydration against intravenous fluids. Victoria complains of a chronic sore throat and a bad taste, which sounds like a pharyngeal problem until you notice the burping, the regurgitation and a fluid intake made almost entirely of coffee, tea and carbonated drinks — extra-oesophageal reflux with a normal growth trajectory and negative chest and abdominal examinations. Trish's soiling reads as behavioural and is not: palpable stool in the descending colon and a loaded rectal vault make it overflow incontinence around a faecal impaction.
Because the diagnoses are relatively clear, the marks concentrate in the plan and the education, and both must be specific. Dosages have to be weight-based and complete — for Jordan, oral rehydration solution at a stated millilitres per kilogram over a stated number of hours with a replacement volume for ongoing losses, not simply the words encourage fluids. Trish needs disimpaction before maintenance, and stating that order is the single thing that separates a correct plan from an ineffective one, since starting maintenance polyethylene glycol on an impacted child produces more soiling and a family who conclude the treatment failed. Victoria's plan is mostly non-pharmacologic and the education is the intervention. In every case name what the family should expect, how long it takes, who to contact between visits, and the specific findings that should bring the child back the same day rather than at the next scheduled appointment.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Estimate dehydration severity from history and examination in a young child.
- 02Recognise extra-oesophageal presentations of gastro-oesophageal reflux.
- 03Distinguish overflow incontinence from behavioural soiling using examination findings.
- 04Write weight-based paediatric management with dose, route and duration.
- 05Design family education that sets expectations and gives return precautions.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01The case study selected.
- 02A differential diagnosis with reasoning from the case findings.
- 03The most likely diagnosis and why.
- 04The unique characteristics of that disorder.
- 05A treatment and management plan including appropriate dosages.
- 06Strategies for educating the patient and family.
Differential, diagnosis, dosed plan, family education
Case selected and its key findings
Name the case and extract the findings the diagnosis will rest on.
Differential diagnosis
Give three or four candidates with support and opposition from the case.
Most likely diagnosis
Declare it and explain what makes it identifiable here.
Unique characteristics of the disorder
Set out what separates it from its nearest neighbour.
Treatment and management with dosages
Give the sequence of management with weight-based doses and durations.
Educating the patient and family
Set expectations, give a timeline and name return precautions.
Guideline sources for the three presentations
Recommended databases
- StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
- NASPGHAN clinical guidelines
- Burns et al., Pediatric Primary Care
- PubMed
- A paediatric dosing reference
Search sequence
- 1.Find a validated clinical dehydration scale and note what each score implies for management.
- 2.Confirm oral rehydration volumes in mL/kg and the replacement rule for ongoing losses.
- 3.Read the guideline sequence for functional constipation: disimpaction, then maintenance.
- 4.Check the evidence for acid suppression in paediatric reflux before recommending it.
- 5.Note the return precautions each guideline gives to families.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Pediatric Dehydration
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Severity assessment and oral rehydration volumes for case one.
- 02
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Extra-oesophageal presentations and lifestyle management for case two.
- 03
Pediatric Functional Constipation
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
The disimpaction-then-maintenance sequence that case three turns on.
- 04
Encopresis
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Separates overflow incontinence from behavioural soiling, and frames the family education.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Skipping the dehydration estimate and going straight to a fluid order.
- Reading Victoria's sore throat as pharyngitis and never examining the diet history.
- Treating Trish's soiling as behavioural despite the palpable stool.
- Prescribing maintenance laxative without disimpaction first.
- Writing encourage fluids or increase fibre where a dose and a duration were required.
- Ending with generic advice instead of expectations and return precautions.
Submission checklist
- The chosen case is named at the start.
- Each differential is argued from findings in the case.
- The primary diagnosis is justified by its distinguishing feature.
- Every treatment carries a weight-based dose, route and duration.
- Non-pharmacologic management appears alongside any medication.
- Family education includes what to expect and when to return.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.