Problem-oriented paper: three articles, three theories
Choose the problem for what the literature can support, not for what annoys you most. Three articles and three theories have to exist for it, and the assignment's headings are the marking scheme.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Three articles and three theories, matched
The choice of problem governs everything downstream, so make it against the requirements rather than from frustration. You need three nursing research articles and three related nursing theories, which means a problem that has been studied and that a theory has something to say about. Alarm fatigue, missed nursing care, hand hygiene compliance, delayed mobilisation, discharge teaching and readmission, and shift-handover information loss all satisfy both. A problem confined to one unit's staffing rota will not. State the problem observationally in the introduction — what you saw, how often, what followed — rather than as a general claim about health care, because the paper is problem-oriented and the observation is what gives it standing. Say too how you came to notice it, because a problem you were told about reads differently from one you saw repeatedly and only later recognised as a pattern, and the second is what this assignment is asking for.
Use the assignment's headings exactly as given, since they are the marking scheme: Introduction, Discussion of research findings, Related theories, Application, Conclusion. The Discussion section reports what the three articles found and where they disagree, which is more useful than three summaries in sequence. The Related theories section is where papers weaken: pick theories that do explanatory work rather than theories you can name. Benner explains why a novice misses what an expert notices; Lewin's change model explains why the last improvement effort failed at refreezing; the Health Belief Model explains non-adherence to a protocol. Say briefly how each relates. Then Application has to do something the earlier sections did not: analyse research and theory together and make a case, either for further research or for a change in the standard of care. Choose one and argue it: if the evidence is thin, the honest case is for research.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Select a clinical problem that the literature and nursing theory can both support.
- 02Synthesise three research articles rather than summarising them in sequence.
- 03Choose theories that explain the problem rather than theories that are merely familiar.
- 04Argue a specific conclusion — further research or a practice change — from the evidence.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A four-page APA paper using the five specified headings.
- 02An observational statement of the problem from your own practice.
- 03Three nursing research articles discussed and compared.
- 04Three nursing theories with their relation to the problem explained.
- 05A reasoned case for further research or a change in standard of care, plus a conclusion.
Following the assignment's own headings
Introduction: the observed problem
State what you observed, how often and with what consequence.
Discussion: the research findings
Report and compare what the three articles found, including disagreement.
Related theories
Introduce three theories and explain what each explains about this problem.
Application of research and theories
Analyse them together and make the case for research or for a practice change.
Conclusion
Say what you learned and how it applies to your future practice.
Finding theories that fit the problem
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- PubMed Central
- Nursology theory repository
- Your nursing theory text
Search sequence
- 1.Search the literature for your candidate problem BEFORE committing — the three-article requirement decides whether it is workable.
- 2.Prefer research articles over reviews, since the assignment asks for research findings.
- 3.Choose the theories after reading the articles, so they explain what the evidence shows rather than being fitted afterwards.
- 4.Check whether the evidence is strong enough to support a practice change; if not, argue for research instead.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Evidence-Based Medicine
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
Frames what strength of evidence a practice-change recommendation requires, which decides the Application section.
- 02
Nursing Theories & Models
Nursology · 2025
Lets you match a theory to the problem's mechanism rather than to your own familiarity.
- 03
Trends and Hotspots in Nursing Theory Research Published from 1990 to 2022
Journal of Nursing Management · 2024
Shows which nursing theories carry applied research, a practical filter for the three-theory requirement.
- 04
Asking Focused Questions
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford · 2024
Helps convert an observed problem into a question the literature can answer.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Choosing a problem with no research literature, which makes the article requirement impossible.
- Summarising three articles in turn instead of discussing them together.
- Naming three theories without showing what each explains about this problem.
- Recommending a practice change on evidence that only supports further research.
- Ignoring the specified headings, which the rubric follows.
Submission checklist
- Does your problem have both research literature and applicable theory?
- Is the problem stated observationally from your own practice?
- Do the three articles get compared rather than listed?
- Does each theory do explanatory work?
- Have you chosen between further research and a practice change, and argued it?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.