EBP intervention and change proposal presentation
Build a presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal for interprofessional leaders and stakeholders, covering intervention, literature, objectives, resources, measurable outcomes and evaluation.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 13, 2026
A decision deck, not a summary deck
This is a dissemination assignment, and dissemination has a direction. Everything in the capstone until now has been written for an assessor who already knows the project; the deck is written for an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders who do not, and who will decide whether the change happens. That shift changes what belongs on a slide. A marker wants completeness, so a paper reports every step of the search strategy. A director of nursing wants to know what you are asking them to approve, what it will cost, and how they will know it worked, and will not sit through a literature review to get there. The six required elements are all present in your existing proposal, so the work here is not new content but re-sequencing and compression for a room of decision makers. Treat every slide as answering a question that a sceptical stakeholder would actually ask out loud during the meeting.
The element students under-build is the last one, evaluation, because it is the part of the proposal that has not happened yet. Anticipated measurable outcomes and how the intervention would be evaluated have to be concrete enough that a stakeholder can picture the report they will receive in six months. That means a named metric, a baseline value, a target, a data source, and a point in time when it will be checked. Resources needed deserves the same discipline: staff time in hours, education sessions, equipment, licences, and who releases each one. The literature belongs on the slide that answers why this intervention rather than another, cited briefly and in APA format, since the prompt asks for source documentation even though the body of the presentation need not follow APA. Design for a spoken delivery, with speaker notes carrying detail so that the slides can stay readable from the back of a room.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Translate a written change proposal into a decision-oriented presentation.
- 02State anticipated outcomes as measurable metrics with baselines and targets.
- 03Specify the resources an intervention requires in units a manager can authorise.
- 04Cite supporting literature in APA format inside a presentation.
- 05Pitch clinical evidence to a mixed interprofessional audience without losing precision.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations DQ Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations DQ
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A presentation covering the evidence-based intervention.
- 02The evidence-based literature that supports it.
- 03Objectives for the change.
- 04Resources needed to implement it.
- 05Anticipated measurable outcomes.
- 06The method by which the intervention would be evaluated.
Six required elements, sequenced
The problem and the ask
Open with the practice problem and the single decision the audience is being asked to make.
The intervention
What will change in practice, described concretely enough to be implemented.
Why this intervention
The supporting literature, compressed to the studies that justify this choice over alternatives.
Objectives
What the change is intended to achieve, stated so that success and failure are distinguishable.
Resources needed
Staff time, education, equipment and approvals, in units a manager can authorise.
Anticipated measurable outcomes
Named metrics with baselines, targets and data sources.
Evaluation plan
When the metrics will be checked, by whom, and what will happen if the target is missed.
Carrying the evidence into slides
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- PubMed
- Cochrane Library
- AHRQ
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Search sequence
- 1.Return to the studies already used in the change proposal and select the two or three that justify the choice of intervention.
- 2.Find a quality improvement source for how to state outcome measures with baselines and targets.
- 3.Look for a published evaluation of a similar intervention to model your evaluation plan on.
- 4.Check whether a national benchmark exists for your chosen outcome metric.
- 5.Confirm the APA format for citing sources on slides.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Section 4: Ways To Approach the Quality Improvement Process
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
How to move from an aim to measurable objectives, for the objectives and outcomes slides.
- 02
Continuous Quality Improvement
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Evaluation cycles and measurement language for the evaluation plan.
- 03
Evidence-Based Medicine
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
The framing of evidence-based change that the presentation is expected to reflect.
- 04
Change Management In Health Care
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Stakeholder buy-in and resistance, which is what the leadership audience for this deck actually decides on.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Building a slide deck that summarises the paper instead of asking for a decision.
- Listing anticipated outcomes as aspirations with no metric, baseline or target.
- Leaving resources vague, so no one can tell what approval is being requested.
- Describing the evaluation as 'ongoing monitoring' with no data source or time point.
- Filling slides with paragraphs that duplicate what the speaker will say.
- Skipping source documentation because APA is not required for the body.
Submission checklist
- All six required elements appear and are findable on their own slides.
- Each anticipated outcome has a metric, a baseline and a target.
- The evaluation slide names a data source and a time point.
- Resources are quantified rather than listed as categories.
- Supporting literature is cited in APA format.
- Slide text is readable at a distance and detail sits in speaker notes.
- The presentation is submitted in LoudCloud for instructor feedback.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.