Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
PsychologyCase studyPsychiatric assessment

PSY 1010 applying knowledge of psychological disorders

An introductory-psychology case assessment with eight lettered sub-questions, where the vignette is built so that reading either half of the pattern alone produces the wrong diagnosis.

Updated

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 8, 2026

01

Which of the eight sub-questions are actually lost?

Eight lettered sub-questions, a to h, and the assignment is graded on whether all eight are answered rather than on how well the prose flows. Use them as headings. The two most often lost are **f** and **h**: *what is the general class(es) of disorders to which this disorder belongs* is not a repeat of the specific diagnosis in **e** — it asks for the diagnostic category the disorder sits inside, and the bracketed plural is a hint that a presentation may touch more than one. And *how could you get his or her family involved* is a full sub-question that routinely receives a closing sentence. Budgeting roughly a paragraph each across the required two pages leaves the eight in proportion, which is what the marking is looking for. Answering them in order also keeps the diagnosis from arriving before the symptoms that justify it.

Read the vignette for its **pattern**, not its worst moment. Tony's description carries two distinct states: periods of elevated energy, rapid speech, grandiose plans, giving away his belongings and needing almost no sleep, and separate periods of withdrawal, oversleeping, self-neglect and veiled references to suicide. Diagnosing from either half alone is the trap the case is built to catch — the low phase read on its own looks like a depressive disorder, and the high phase alone looks like something else again. It is the alternation between the two, and specifically the reduced need for sleep alongside grandiosity and expansive plans, that gives the case its shape. Say that the *pattern over time* is what you are diagnosing. Quote the vignette's own phrases as you go, since a marker can then see which detail you took each conclusion from.

Register matters more than it might seem in a general psychology course. Write *the presentation is consistent with* rather than *Tony has*, because a paragraph of description is not a clinical interview and there is no history, no collateral, no medical workup and no timeline in front of you. That caution is not hedging; at introductory level it is the single clearest way to show you understand what a diagnosis actually requires. It also sets you up for sub-question **c**, which asks whether the client has a history with this problem — the vignette implies recurrence with “once” and “during other periods of time”, and saying what you would need to establish is a better answer than inventing a history the case does not give you. The same applies to sub-question e: name the disorder, then say which criteria the vignette evidences and which remain unknown.

The suicidal content in the vignette should be addressed, not stepped around. Sub-question **g** asks for your recommendations and a specific treatment plan, and a plan for someone making references to wanting to die begins with risk — asking directly, establishing intent, means and protective factors, and deciding on a level of care — before it reaches anything about longer-term therapy. Sequencing the plan that way is clinically correct and it is also the part a marker will look for. Sub-question **h** then follows naturally rather than as an afterthought, because family involvement in a case with risk has a concrete purpose: observation, support with adherence, and knowing what to do and who to call. Family involvement also raises consent and confidentiality, and noting that an adult client decides what is shared is worth a sentence.

Two constraints on sources are unusually specific. The brief supplies exactly one required text and says you *must incorporate research from the textbook to substantiate your diagnosis*, so the textbook has to be visibly doing the work — cited at the diagnostic reasoning, not listed at the end. The library is permitted but explicitly not required, so outside sources are a bonus rather than a requirement, and everything used must be cited, with paraphrase carrying a citation as much as quotation. Note finally that the brief says to choose one of the cases listed, while only case 1 appears in this version of it; check your course shell before assuming Tony is the only option. Two pages is a floor rather than a target, so there is room to answer all eight properly without padding any of them.

Sub-question

What it asks for

The answer that loses marks

a. Why coming for treatment

The presenting reason, in his terms

A restatement of the whole vignette

b. Current symptoms

Both states, grouped and named

One phase only

c. History

What the case implies, and what you would ask

An invented backstory

d. Effect on daily functioning

Work, relationships, self-care, finances

“It affects his life negatively”

e. Specific diagnosis

One named disorder, stated tentatively

A confident diagnosis from a paragraph

f. General class(es)

The diagnostic category it sits inside

The specific diagnosis repeated

g. Recommendations and plan

Risk first, then treatment, from the textbook

A treatment list with no risk step

h. Family involvement

A concrete role with a purpose

One closing sentence

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Identify a disorder from a pattern across time rather than from a single presentation.
  • 02
    Distinguish a specific diagnosis from the diagnostic class that contains it.
  • 03
    Express diagnostic conclusions with the certainty the available information supports.
  • 04
    Sequence a treatment plan so that risk is addressed before longer-term intervention.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Assignment Applying Knowledge of Psychological Disorders Applying Knowledge of Psychological Disorders Applying Knowledge of Psychological Disorders: Complete the following assignment using the source listed below for citations: Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2017). Psychology [VitalSource Bookshelf version] (12th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781323598269 Applying Knowledge of Psychological Disorders Within Unit VIII, you have learned about various psychological disorders and the complexities involved with proper diagnoses and treatment efforts. Now it is time to put your skills to the test. Choose ONE of the cases listed below and create a mental health assessment for your chosen case. In the assessment, you should address the following: a. Why is your client coming for treatment? b. What are his or her current symptoms? PSY 1010, General Psychology 4 c. Does he or she have a history with this problem? If so, please describe it. d. How could the issue affect his or her daily life functions? e. What is your client’s specific diagnosis? f. What is the general class(es) of disorders to which this disorder belongs? g. What are your recommendations? What specific treatment plan will you prescribe for this patient? You should use your textbook as a reference to substantiate your plan. Assignment Applying Knowledge of Psychological Disorders h. How could you get his or her family involved? Chose ONE of these cases to analyze. 1. Tony sometimes seems very wound up. At those times, he seems full of energy, talks very rapidly, and makes very grandiose plans. Once, he gave away all of his belongings and was planning to move to Washington, D.C., so that he could advise the President. At these times, he also seems to need almost no sleep. During other periods of time Tony seems very down. During these times, he does not take care of himself. He seems to want to sleep all the time, and he often makes thinly veiled references to wanting to commit suicide. In your case study, you must incorporate research from the textbook to substantiate your diagnosis. You may also use the Waldorf Online Library for additional reference material if needed, but this is not required. Your response should be at least two pages in length. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Applying Knowledge of Psychological Disorders
02

What the mental health assessment must contain

  1. 01
    A mental health assessment of one chosen case.
  2. 02
    Answers to all eight lettered sub-questions.
  3. 03
    A specific diagnosis, and the general class of disorders it belongs to.
  4. 04
    Recommendations and a specific treatment plan.
  5. 05
    A plan for involving the client's family.
  6. 06
    Textbook research substantiating the diagnosis.
  7. 07
    At least two pages.
  8. 08
    Citations for all quoted and paraphrased material, and a reference list.
03

From presenting concern to diagnosis, plan and family

01

Presenting concern

State why the client is coming for treatment, from the vignette's own facts.

02

Current symptoms

Group the symptoms by phase and name them in clinical terms.

03

History and course

Say what the case implies about recurrence and what you would need to establish.

04

Impact on daily functioning

Work through self-care, relationships, work and finances.

05

Diagnosis and diagnostic class

Name the disorder, then the category of disorders it belongs to.

06

Recommendations and treatment plan

Address risk, then set out the treatment approach the textbook supports.

07

Involving the family

Give the family a defined role, and say what it is for.

04

Substantiating a diagnosis from the required textbook

Recommended databases

  • The Wade and Tavris textbook
  • The Waldorf Online Library
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • NCBI Bookshelf

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Work from the textbook first, because the brief names it as the source that must substantiate the diagnosis and outside reading cannot replace that requirement.
  2. 2.
    Check the diagnostic criteria for the disorder you are proposing against the vignette line by line, so you can say which criteria the case evidences and which it leaves unknown.
  3. 3.
    Look up what treatment is actually first-line for the disorder before writing the plan, since a plan that names no specific approach is the most common weakness in this answer.
  4. 4.
    Read current guidance on responding to expressed suicidal ideation, because the vignette contains it and a plan that omits it is incomplete regardless of how good the rest is.
05

Diagnostic and treatment sources for the case

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Bipolar Disorder

    National Institute of Mental Health · 2025

    A plain-language statement of the alternating pattern the vignette describes, including the reduced need for sleep, elevated activity and grandiosity that distinguish an elevated episode from ordinary good mood. Useful for checking your reading of the case, and for the treatment and family sections, which it addresses directly.

  2. 02

    Bipolar Disorder

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2025

    The clinical counterpart to the NIMH page, with the diagnostic criteria set out and the differential discussed. Use it to answer sub-question f properly — it shows where the disorder sits within its category and which neighbouring categories a presentation like this has to be distinguished from.

  3. 03

    Suicide Prevention

    National Institute of Mental Health · 2025

    The vignette contains veiled references to wanting to die, so the treatment plan has to begin here. This gives you warning signs, the evidence that asking directly about suicide does not increase risk, and what immediate help involves — which is what makes the sequencing of your plan defensible rather than a matter of taste.

  4. 04

    Mental Illness

    National Institute of Mental Health · 2025

    Prevalence and treatment-access data, useful for the functional impact and recommendations sections where an introductory paper otherwise tends toward assertion. It also supplies context for the family involvement answer, since the figures on who receives treatment explain why support around adherence matters.

06

Before the psychological disorders case study is submitted

Common mistakes

  • Writing continuous prose so that some of the eight sub-questions are never clearly answered.
  • Answering f by repeating the diagnosis given in e.
  • Diagnosing from the low phase alone, or from the elevated phase alone.
  • Missing the reduced need for sleep, which is one of the discriminating features.
  • Stating the diagnosis with a confidence a written vignette cannot support.
  • Inventing a clinical history the case does not supply.
  • Answering d with a general statement about life being harder.
  • Building a treatment plan that never addresses the suicidal references.
  • Treating family involvement as a closing sentence rather than a sub-question.
  • Listing the textbook in the references without using it in the diagnostic reasoning.
  • Citing paraphrased material without an in-text citation.

Submission checklist

  • All eight sub-questions are answered and identifiable.
  • Both phases of the presentation are described.
  • The diagnosis is stated tentatively and justified from the vignette's own details.
  • The general class of disorders is named and is not the diagnosis restated.
  • Functional impact covers more than one domain of life.
  • Risk is addressed before longer-term treatment in the plan.
  • The family involvement answer states a specific role and purpose.
  • The textbook is cited at the point where the diagnosis is argued.
  • The response is at least two pages.
  • Every source, including the textbook, appears in the reference list.

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order