SCI115 Week 9 Mr Smith heart disease diet case study
Using the Mr Smith case, explain his modifiable risk factors for heart disease, calculate his BMI and the weight loss needed, recommend a fat intake in grams with foods to limit and heart-healthy fats to include, and propose three nutritional interventions, in roughly 250 words on the worksheet.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
Modifiable is the word doing the work
Two things in this case have to be calculated rather than discussed, and getting them wrong undermines everything after. Mr Smith is 5 feet 10 inches and 265 pounds, which puts his body mass index near 38, in the obesity range, and the healthy range for his height tops out around 174 pounds — so the weight loss question has a number attached, and it is a large one. Show the calculation rather than asserting the result. The fat recommendation is the second calculation and it is the one most often skipped: the question asks for grams, which means starting from an estimated daily energy requirement, applying the recommended proportion from fat, and converting using nine calories per gram, with saturated fat held to a small share of that total. A recommendation expressed as eat less saturated fat has not answered the question that was asked.
The word modifiable is the other place marks are lost. Mr Smith's age and sex are risk factors and neither can be changed, so listing them wastes the answer. What is modifiable is his weight and the thirty pounds gained in a year, his diet high in saturated and trans fats, his total cholesterol of 225, his blood pressure of 150 over 95, and whatever physical activity level lies behind breathlessness on stairs. Each of those is something a nutritional intervention can move. Then the three interventions should be specific enough to act on this week — a named substitution, a portion or frequency change, a way of reading a label — rather than eat healthier. His concern about starting atorvastatin is also a real opening: dietary change and statin therapy work together rather than competing, and saying so answers the worry he actually raised.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Distinguish modifiable from non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.
- 02Calculate body mass index and a healthy weight range from height and weight.
- 03Convert an energy requirement into a fat intake expressed in grams.
- 04Differentiate saturated and trans fats from heart-healthy fats by food source.
- 05Design nutritional interventions specific enough to be acted on.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Mr Smith's modifiable risk factors, briefly explained.
- 02His calculated BMI and the pounds needed to reach a healthy weight.
- 03A fat intake recommendation in grams, with five foods to limit.
- 04Five foods to include for heart-healthy fats.
- 05Three nutritional interventions to improve his heart health.
- 06Responses in the Assignment Worksheet section, correctly named for submission.
Risk factors, BMI, fats, then interventions
Modifiable risk factors
Identify the factors nutrition and behaviour can change.
BMI and target weight
Calculate BMI and the weight loss required for a healthy range.
Fat intake in grams
Derive a daily fat target and a saturated fat limit.
Foods to limit and foods to add
List five of each, tied to saturated, trans and unsaturated fats.
Three interventions
Propose specific, actionable changes and address the statin question.
Where the dietary targets come from
Recommended databases
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- MedlinePlus
- StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
- Your course textbook
- PubMed
Search sequence
- 1.Calculate BMI first, so every later recommendation has a baseline.
- 2.Find the current recommended proportion of energy from fat and from saturated fat.
- 3.Look up which foods carry trans fats, since labelling has changed.
- 4.Read a current account of dietary patterns with cardiovascular evidence behind them.
- 5.Check how statin therapy and dietary change interact before writing that paragraph.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Heart-Healthy Living - What Is Heart-Healthy Living?
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute · 2024
Authoritative dietary and lifestyle targets for exactly this patient profile.
- 02
Hyperlipidemia
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Clinical reference for the cholesterol result and how diet and statins act on it.
- 03
Physiology, Body Mass Index
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
The BMI calculation and its classification thresholds, plus its known limitations.
- 04
Heart Disease
MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine · 2024
Plain-language material for the patient education framing of the interventions.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing age and sex among modifiable risk factors.
- Stating a BMI category without showing the calculation.
- Recommending less saturated fat when the question asks for grams.
- Confusing trans fats with unsaturated fats when listing foods to limit.
- Giving interventions so general that no behaviour changes.
- Ignoring the statin, which is the concern Mr Smith actually raised.
Submission checklist
- Every risk factor named is genuinely modifiable.
- BMI is calculated and the working is visible.
- A weight loss figure in pounds is given.
- Fat intake is expressed in grams and derived from an energy estimate.
- Five foods to limit and five to include are listed.
- The file follows the naming convention the brief specifies.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.