Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
NursingResearch paperHealth policy

Triaxial of action: policy, politics and nursing

Seven short definitional questions and then a case study that is doing something different: Jeanne Blum is an illustration of the triaxial itself, where a nurse moved a practice question into the policy arena.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 15, 2026

01

Seven definitional questions, then a case that reframes them

Most of this assignment is definitional and can be answered efficiently, which matters because the 1,000-word minimum has to cover seven questions plus a case. Distinguish the five policy types carefully, since that is where quick answers usually go wrong: public policy is governmental, private policy is set by non-governmental bodies, health policy and social policy are defined by domain rather than by who makes them, and organisational policy operates within a single institution. They overlap, and saying so is better than pretending they are clean categories. For the three historical figures, resist the encyclopaedia entry and answer what the question asks — Nightingale's contribution was using data to change policy, Wald built public health nursing and the settlement model, Sanger's work centred on reproductive health access and drew legal consequences. Each connects to the paper's actual theme, which is how nurses have historically moved practice concerns into the policy arena.

The Jeanne Blum case is not an appendix, and treating it as one is the main way this paper underperforms. It is a concrete instance of the triaxial in operation: a clinical practice concern, raised through professional standards, resolved through a regulatory body's declaratory statement — practice, profession and policy meeting in one sequence. Say that explicitly. The details reward attention: she compared her employer's procedure manual against her state board's position and her professional organisation's standards, found a gap, and used a formal mechanism rather than an informal complaint. That is the difference between grumbling in the break room and policy action, and it is exactly what the chapter is teaching. Note also that the ICN and NLCA questions set up this case, since professional bodies are the machinery through which a nurse's concern becomes a standard, so answer them with the case in mind rather than as isolated definitions.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Distinguish five types of policy by who makes them and what domain they govern.
  • 02
    Connect historical nursing figures to the mechanism by which they changed policy.
  • 03
    Analyse a contemporary case as an instance of practice, profession and policy interacting.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Discussion of Triaxial of action: Policy Politics and Nursing The assignment must have a MINIMUM of 1000 WORDS. This assignment is based on chapter Finance of my book. Please feel free to visit the book link that I will be providing you with in order to answer the assignment correctly. Book Link: http://resources.fadavis.com/whitehead5/Bonus_Chapters/BonusChapter02.pdf Also, look out for plagiarism percentage, and cite all references used. The paper must be in APA 6th Edition format. The assignment is as follows: Read Chapter on Davis Plus: Discussion of Triaxial of action: Policy, Politics,and Nursing 1- What is Policy? 2- Explain each of them: Public policy— Private policy— Health policy— Social policy— Organizational policy? 3- Who was Florence Nightingale, and what was her contribution to the Nursing Field? 4- Who was Lillian Wald? 5- Who was Margaret Sanger, and in what way she helped to the developments of Nursing Field? 6_ what is (ICN), and what they do? 7- What is s (NLCA) and they do? Jeanne Blum, RN, is a nurse on a LDRP unit. Recently, the policy and procedures manual for Jeanne’s unit included the premature rupturing of membranes of a laboring patient as a practice acceptable for nurses to perform. Jeanne and some of her coworkers shared their concern over lunch about this new responsibility. They felt uncomfortable with the possibility of cord prolapse and other potential medical complications resulting from this practice. Jeanne gathered data from her state and many others states and noted that her hospital was not in compliance with her professional organization practice standards. Jeanne shared this information with her coworkers. She volunteered to contact the state board of nursing on their behalf to request a declaratory statement on the nurse’s role in the initiation of premature rupturing of uterine membranes. Her state board’s clinical practice committee reviewed her request for a declaratory statement and gathered information from other states. A formal declaratory statement was drafted by the board and made it available on its Web site. A letter from the board was sent to Jeanne’s institution, informing it of the declaratory statement, which stated that the task nurses were requested to perform was beyond their scope of practice based on the Nurse Practice Act.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Nursing Leadership: Florence Nightingale Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    A paper of at least 1,000 words in APA 6th edition format.
  2. 02
    Answers to all seven numbered questions.
  3. 03
    An analysis of the Jeanne Blum case connecting it to the triaxial.
  4. 04
    Full citations, including the chapter provided in the brief.
03

Working the policy types before the Jeanne Blum case

01

Define policy and its five types

Give a working definition, then distinguish public, private, health, social and organisational policy.

02

The three figures and their mechanisms

State what each contributed and, more importantly, how each changed policy.

03

The ICN and the NLCA

Describe what each body is and what it does, setting up the case that follows.

04

Analyse the Jeanne Blum case

Trace the sequence from clinical concern through professional standards to a regulatory declaratory statement.

05

Draw the theme together

Connect the historical figures and the contemporary case through the mechanism they share.

04

Sources for policy definitions and board authority

Recommended databases

  • The Davis Plus bonus chapter provided in the brief
  • International Council of Nurses
  • American Nurses Association
  • Your state board of nursing
  • CINAHL

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Read the linked chapter first; the paper is explicitly based on it and its definitions are what you will be marked against.
  2. 2.
    Check the ICN's own site for its stated functions rather than relying on a summary.
  3. 3.
    Look at a real declaratory statement from any state board so the Jeanne Blum mechanism is concrete to you.
  4. 4.
    Verify each historical claim in a scholarly source; the popular accounts of all three figures contain persistent errors.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    The Impact of Education on Nursing Practice

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing · 2026

    A current example of a professional body using evidence to argue for a policy position, which is the mechanism the paper is about.

  2. 02

    Code of Ethics

    National Association of Social Workers · 2021

    Section 6.04 is the standard the prompt cites by number, and reading it directly is what lets the post argue from the duty rather than paraphrase it.

  3. 03

    About CAHPS

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024

    Shows how experience data is collected and reported, which is the mechanism by which staff and patient perceptions become organisational evidence.

  4. 04

    Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study

    International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · 2019

    Directly relevant to the Jeanne Blum case: how nurses negotiate the boundary between employer procedure and professional standard.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Treating the five policy types as cleanly separable when they overlap by design.
  • Writing biography for the three historical figures instead of naming their policy mechanism.
  • Appending the Jeanne Blum case without connecting it to the chapter's framework.
  • Missing the word count because the definitional questions were answered at excessive length.

Submission checklist

  • Are all seven numbered questions answered?
  • Do the five policy definitions distinguish maker from domain?
  • Is the Jeanne Blum case analysed as an instance of the triaxial rather than summarised?
  • Does the paper meet 1,000 words in correct APA format?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order