vSim Stan Checketts: severe abdominal pain activity packet
A clinical replacement activity packet for a virtual patient: a 52-year-old man in the emergency department with severe abdominal pain, vomiting, distension and no urine output, worked through a clinical worksheet, a plan of care concept map, pharmacology sheets and an ISBAR handoff. This guide covers why the four assigned readings are a single chain, the acid-base answer that is conditional, and the finding his own explanation cannot cover.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 6, 2026
Four readings, one patient, one chain
The packet lists four assigned readings, and they are not four topics. Fluid volume disturbances, acid-base disturbances, hypovolaemic shock and bowel obstruction are one causal chain, printed in the order it runs backwards. Reading them as a list is the difference between a concept map and a set of bullet points.
Run the chain forwards from the obstruction. Bowel content stops moving, so fluid is sequestered in the lumen and the bowel wall — third spacing — while vomiting removes more from outside the circulation entirely. That is the fluid volume disturbance, and the vignette's findings are its stages laid out in order: poor skin turgor and dry mucous membranes, then dizziness and weakness on standing, then no urine since yesterday. When intravascular volume falls far enough that perfusion is compromised, the fluid deficit has become hypovolaemic shock. The four readings describe one patient at four points on the same trajectory, and the concept map is the artefact that will show whether you saw that or not. Building the map from the origin outward also makes the plan of care fall out of it, since each arrow is a problem and each problem needs an intervention.
The acid-base reading is the one that rewards care, because the answer is conditional rather than fixed. Persistent vomiting removes gastric acid, so the expected disturbance is a metabolic alkalosis, and it usually arrives with low chloride and low potassium because those are lost alongside. That is the textbook answer and it is probably right here. But if the obstructed bowel becomes ischaemic, anaerobic metabolism and lactate production push in the opposite direction and the picture turns acidotic — which makes a shift from alkalosis toward acidosis an ominous change rather than an improvement. Given that his pain has been getting worse, saying which disturbance you expect and what would make you revise it is a better answer than naming one. Naming a condition under which your own prediction fails is also the habit the post-simulation debrief will be looking for, and it is cheap to demonstrate here.
His own explanation is the trap the case is built around. He thought it might be the flu, and flu is a reasonable enough story for nausea, vomiting and feeling weak. It does not account for a distended abdomen or for eighteen hours without urine, and the nurse who accepts the patient's framing will document a gastrointestinal illness rather than a surgical emergency. The distension is the finding that does not fit, and the anuria is the one that sets the urgency. Naming both explicitly in the clinical worksheet — as findings that contradict the presenting narrative — is what a clinical judgement rubric is looking for. Patients supply explanations constantly and most of them are reasonable; the skill is noticing the one finding that the explanation leaves over, and treating that as the thread to pull.
The packet's own structure tells you how the effort splits. Step one carries four artefacts and an estimate of four to six hours, and each artefact does a different job: the clinical worksheet gathers and organises, the concept map shows the relationships between the problems, the pharmacology sheets are one per medication so their number follows from the plan you build, and the ISBAR worksheet compresses everything into a handoff. The recommendation line of that handoff is where most students go vague, and it is the line that carries the most weight — for this patient it should name what you want done and by when, not that the provider should be aware of the situation. Working backwards from the handoff can help: if you know what you would ask the provider for, the worksheets in front of it have a target.
Finding in the case | What it belongs to | What it indicates |
|---|---|---|
Severe abdominal pain, worsening over days | Bowel obstruction | The primary process, and worsening pain raises ischaemia |
Abdominal distension | Bowel obstruction | The finding his flu explanation cannot account for |
Nausea and vomiting for days | Fluid and acid-base | Volume loss plus loss of gastric acid, chloride and potassium |
Poor skin turgor, dry mucous membranes | Fluid volume deficit | Established deficit, extracellular |
Dizzy and weak all evening | Fluid volume deficit | Compensation failing on position change |
No urine since yesterday | Hypovolaemic shock | Renal perfusion compromised — the urgency marker |
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Trace a causal chain from a primary process through its fluid, electrolyte and perfusion consequences.
- 02Predict an acid-base disturbance from a mechanism, and name the condition that would reverse the prediction.
- 03Identify the findings that contradict a patient's own explanation of their illness.
- 04Order clinical findings by the stage of deterioration they represent.
- 05Write a handoff recommendation that names an action and a timeframe.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
What the activity packet asks you to produce
- 01The suggested readings completed before the activities.
- 02A completed Clinical Worksheet.
- 03A completed Plan of Care Concept Map.
- 04A Pharm4Fun Worksheet for each medication.
- 05A completed ISBAR Worksheet.
- 06The pre-simulation quiz, the simulation itself and the remaining steps of the six-step learn flow.
- 07Submission for grading as instructed in the syllabus.
Worksheet, concept map, pharmacology, handoff
Read the four chapters as one sequence
Work out how obstruction produces fluid loss, how fluid loss produces shock, and where the acid-base change fits.
Clinical Worksheet — sort the findings by stage
Group the data into the primary process, the fluid deficit, the perfusion consequences, and what is not yet known.
Concept map — draw the arrows
Place the obstruction at the origin and connect each consequence to what produced it.
Predict the acid-base disturbance, conditionally
State the expected disturbance from the vomiting, name the electrolytes lost with it, and say what ischaemia would change.
Pharmacology sheets, one per medication
Complete a sheet for each drug the plan involves, including fluids and any antiemetic or analgesic.
ISBAR — write a recommendation that asks for something
Compress the case into the handoff and close with a specific request and a timeframe.
Where the chain from obstruction to shock is documented
Recommended databases
- The four assigned course text chapters
- PubMed / NCBI Bookshelf
- The simulation platform's own resources
Search sequence
- 1.Read the obstruction chapter first, since it is the origin of everything else in this case.
- 2.Check what fluid and electrolyte losses obstruction and vomiting produce, and in what direction they move pH.
- 3.Look up the stages of hypovolaemic shock so the findings can be ordered by severity rather than listed.
- 4.Confirm what changes when obstructed bowel becomes ischaemic, since that reverses the acid-base prediction.
Sources for obstruction, volume loss and electrolyte change
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Small Bowel Obstruction
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, US National Library of Medicine · 2023
Fluid sequestration, vomiting losses, the resulting hypovolaemia and the alkalosis-versus-acidosis distinction that turns on ischaemia. This single source connects three of the four assigned readings and is the backbone of the concept map.
- 02
Hypovolemia and Hypovolemic Shock
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, US National Library of Medicine · 2023
The stages of volume depletion and the point at which deficit becomes shock. Use it to order the findings — turgor, then dizziness, then absent urine output — rather than listing them.
- 03
Hypokalemia
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, US National Library of Medicine · 2023
Why potassium is lost alongside chloride and hydrogen in protracted vomiting, and what that does to the patient. It is what makes the acid-base answer specific rather than a label.
- 04
Evaluation and Management of Mechanical Small Bowel Obstruction in Adults
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, NCBI Bookshelf · 2022
The management sequence — resuscitation, decompression, and the findings that indicate surgery rather than observation. This is the source for the ISBAR recommendation being an action rather than a notification.
Before the packet is submitted
Common mistakes
- Treating the four assigned readings as four separate topics rather than as stages of one process.
- Building a concept map that lists problems without showing what causes what.
- Naming an acid-base disturbance without saying what would change it.
- Missing that worsening pain in an obstruction raises the possibility of ischaemia, which reverses the expected acid-base picture.
- Accepting the patient's own explanation and documenting a gastrointestinal illness rather than a surgical presentation.
- Recording the absence of urine output without recognising it as the urgency marker.
- Producing one pharmacology sheet when the instruction says one per medication.
- Writing an ISBAR recommendation that asks the provider to be aware rather than to act.
Submission checklist
- The concept map shows directional relationships, not just a list of problems.
- The obstruction appears as the primary process with the other three as consequences.
- The expected acid-base disturbance is named, with the condition that would reverse it.
- Electrolyte losses accompanying vomiting are identified specifically.
- The findings that contradict the flu explanation are named as such.
- The absent urine output is treated as an urgency marker rather than a data point.
- There is one pharmacology worksheet per medication.
- The ISBAR recommendation names a specific action and a timeframe.
- All six steps of the learn flow are completed before submission.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.