Week 7 DQ: disseminating EBP findings to nurses
Discuss strategies to disseminate research and EBP findings to staff-level nurses and to advanced practice nurses, how you would ensure every appropriate audience receives the information, and what a journal's or conference's submission guidelines require and why.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
Different audiences need different channels
The first prompt asks about two audiences and then about coverage, and the structure matters because the answer is different for each. A staff nurse receives information at the bedside and inside the shift: huddles, a change-of-shift briefing, a unit poster or storyboard, a laminated bedside reminder, a revised order set that carries the evidence in the workflow, a skills-day station, a unit newsletter, a peer champion who already has credibility on the floor. An advanced practice nurse is reached through channels with more formal authority: grand rounds, a journal club, a professional-organisation presentation, a peer-reviewed publication, a policy or protocol revision, continuing education. Then answer the third part explicitly, because coverage is a separate problem: audit who was reached rather than who was invited, plan for nights, weekends and agency staff, and put the finding in a place people encounter in the course of the work rather than in a place they must remember to visit.
The second question turns to submission guidelines, and it wants you to have actually opened one. Name the journal or conference — the prompt requires it — and report what its guidelines specify: abstract word limit and structure, manuscript categories, required reporting checklists such as SQUIRE for improvement work or PRISMA for reviews, reference style and limit, figure and table specifications, IRB and consent statements, conflict-of-interest and authorship declarations, and the blinding requirements for peer review. Then say why those components exist, which is the analytic half: a structured abstract makes work findable and screenable, reporting checklists make it appraisable and reproducible, and disclosure statements let a reader judge bias. Formatting is not fussiness — desk rejection for non-compliance is common and costs months of delay, and a consistent format is what lets a reviewer compare competing submissions on their content rather than on how carefully their authors read the instructions.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Match dissemination channels to the audience that uses them.
- 02Plan for coverage across shifts and staff categories, and verify it.
- 03Read and summarise a real set of author guidelines.
- 04Explain the purpose behind each required component of a submission.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Strategies to disseminate information to staff-level nurses.
- 02Strategies best suited to advanced practice nurses.
- 03How you will ensure all appropriate audiences receive the information.
- 04A named professional journal or conference and its submission guidelines.
- 05The components those guidelines highlight and why they matter.
- 06The role formatting plays and why.
Staff nurses, advanced practice nurses, then the submission guidelines
What dissemination has to achieve
Awareness is not adoption; the channel has to reach the point of care.
Reaching staff nurses
Huddles, storyboards, order sets, champions, skills days.
Reaching advanced practice nurses
Grand rounds, journal club, publication, protocol revision, CE.
Ensuring coverage
Nights, weekends, agency staff, and an audit of who was actually reached.
One journal or conference
Named, with its abstract limits, checklists, style and declarations.
Why the components exist
Findability, appraisability, reproducibility, and judging bias.
Where dissemination is studied rather than asserted
Recommended databases
- Implementation Science
- PubMed Central
- Target journal author guidelines
- Professional conference call for abstracts
Search sequence
- 1.Open the author guidelines of a journal you would realistically submit to.
- 2.Note its abstract structure, word limits and required checklists.
- 3.Read a knowledge-translation overview for the audience-channel argument.
- 4.Find evidence on which dissemination strategies changed practice.
- 5.Draft the coverage plan before the strategy list.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Knowledge translation of research findings
Implementation Science (BioMed Central) · 2012
Evidence on which dissemination strategies actually change practice.
- 02
What can organisational theory offer knowledge translation in healthcare? A thematic and lexical analysis
BMC Health Services Research · 2018
Why the same message needs different routes in different parts of an organisation.
- 03
Mapping Implementation Strategies and Outcomes When Using Evidence Based Practice Implementation Models in Nursing Settings: A Scoping Review
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · 2025
Which strategies were used in nursing settings and what they achieved.
- 04
QSEN: Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes Associated With Evidence-Based Practice (Table 9.4)
Nursing Management and Professional Concepts, Chippewa Valley Technical College (NCBI Bookshelf) · 2022
The competency that makes dissemination part of the EBP process.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Giving one undifferentiated list of strategies for both audiences.
- Treating an email to all staff as evidence that everyone was reached.
- Forgetting night, weekend and agency staff in the coverage plan.
- Not naming the journal or conference, which the prompt requires.
- Summarising guidelines without saying why each component exists.
- Dismissing formatting rather than explaining what it does for review.
Submission checklist
- Staff-nurse and APN strategies are answered separately.
- A coverage plan addresses shifts and staff categories.
- Reach is verified, not assumed.
- The journal or conference is named.
- At least four required components are described.
- The purpose of formatting is explained.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.