Why complete your BSN now: concerns and strategies
A reflective prompt with a research requirement attached. It asks why you are returning, what worries you, and — from the course materials — what strategies will make you successful, and that last part is what stops it being a diary entry.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Why the course readings requirement changes this post
This is a reflective prompt, which makes it easy to write and easy to underperform on. Three things are asked: why you decided to complete your BSN at this time, the concerns you have about completing a baccalaureate degree, and — based on the readings in the course materials — what strategies you can implement to be a successful student. The third requirement is the one that converts a personal account into a graded post, because it must draw on the assigned material rather than on general advice. A post that is entirely autobiography, however sincere, has skipped it. Note too that the brief supplies a specific resource on balancing work, family and study, which is a strong signal that the strategies section is expected to engage with the practical conflicts of a working nurse rather than with study tips in the abstract, a distinction almost none of your classmates will bother to make.
The why can carry more weight than students expect if it goes past personal preference. The measured association between the proportion of baccalaureate-prepared nurses and patient outcomes, the Magnet requirement, the entry requirements for graduate study and for many specialty roles are all citable, and grounding a personal decision in that evidence shows professional awareness. On concerns, be honest and specific — time against shift work, the cost, returning to academic writing after years away, statistics if you have not studied it recently — because a vague worry cannot be matched to a strategy. Then pair each concern with something concrete from the readings: a schedule built around your roster, the writing centre, a study group, a conversation with your manager about roster stability. The pairing is what makes the post read as a plan rather than a list, and it gives your instructor something concrete to respond to when the discussion opens.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Articulate a professional rationale for baccalaureate study that goes beyond personal preference.
- 02Identify specific, nameable obstacles to completing a degree while working as a nurse.
- 03Match each obstacle to a strategy drawn from the assigned course materials.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Discuss why you have decided to complete your BSN ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Discuss why you have decided to complete your BSN
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A post of at least 250 words.
- 02A stated reason for returning to study now, supported where possible by professional evidence.
- 03Specific concerns rather than generic anxieties.
- 04Strategies drawn explicitly from the course readings, with references at the end of the post.
Pairing each concern with a strategy that answers it
Why now
State the decision and connect it to professional drivers — outcome evidence, employer requirements, graduate study, or a specific role.
Name the concerns specifically
Identify the real obstacles: rostered hours, finances, academic writing after time away, quantitative subjects.
Strategies from the readings
Pair each concern with a concrete strategy drawn from the assigned course materials.
Close with a commitment
State one thing you will do in the first weeks, so the post ends as a plan rather than a reflection.
Starting from the assigned Week 1 materials
Recommended databases
- Your course materials and assigned readings for Week 1
- American Association of Colleges of Nursing
- CINAHL
- PubMed
- Your university's student support and writing centre pages
Search sequence
- 1.Start with the assigned readings — the prompt says the strategies must be based on them, so they are the primary source.
- 2.Use the AACN education fact sheet for the outcome evidence connecting BSN preparation to patient results.
- 3.If you cite research on student stress or belonging, prefer a study of baccalaureate nursing students specifically.
- 4.Check your own institution's support services so the strategies you name actually exist for you.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
The Impact of Education on Nursing Practice
American Association of Colleges of Nursing · 2026
Supplies the outcome evidence linking BSN preparation to mortality and failure-to-rescue rates, so a personal answer can rest on something measured.
- 02
A sense of belonging and perceived stress among baccalaureate nursing students in clinical placements
Nurse Education Today, via PubMed · 2016
Evidence that the concerns section is describing a documented pattern rather than a personal weakness, which strengthens the strategies that follow.
- 03
Plagiarism Overview - Purdue OWL
Purdue University · 2024
Relevant to the returning-to-academic-writing concern, which is among the most commonly named in this discussion.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Writing pure autobiography and never engaging with the course materials, which the prompt requires by name.
- Listing concerns so vaguely that no strategy could address them.
- Offering generic study advice that could apply to any student in any programme.
- Omitting references, which the brief asks for explicitly.
Submission checklist
- Does the post reach 250 words and answer all three parts?
- Is your reason for studying now connected to something beyond personal preference?
- Is each concern specific enough to be matched with a strategy?
- Do the strategies come from the course readings, and are the references listed?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.