Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
BiologyResearch paperConservation

Zoo Conservation and the Noah's Ark Model

The prompt names three categories of challenge — genetic, ecosystem and economic — and supplies a reading that questions the whole model. Both are invitations to argue.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 16, 2026

01

The Noah's Ark metaphor is set up to be examined

The prompt supplies a metaphor and then supplies the reasons it fails, which is an invitation to examine rather than to repeat. The Noah's Ark model treats the zoo as a refuge holding species until they can be returned, and the three challenge categories named in the brief are precisely the reasons that is harder than it sounds. Genetic: captive populations are small, founder effects and inbreeding depression accumulate, and maintaining viable genetic diversity requires coordinated breeding across many institutions and still loses variation over generations. Ecosystem: a species preserved without its habitat has nowhere to return to, and animals bred over generations in captivity may lose behaviours that reintroduction depends on. Economic: zoo resources are finite and concentrate on charismatic large mammals, which are neither the most endangered nor the most ecologically consequential taxa, and the funding follows visitors rather than need. Treat those three as separate sections, because merging them loses the structure the brief supplies.

Keulartz's title — captivity for conservation, zoos at a crossroads — signals that the reading is a critical assessment rather than an endorsement, so read it as an argument and say what it concludes. The technology reading pulls in a different direction and the interesting move is to hold both. Live cameras and remote monitoring change what a zoo can contribute: they support in-situ research and public engagement without capturing anything, and they weaken the argument that animals must be held to be studied or to inspire support. But they do not maintain a breeding population, and a virtual audience does not pay for a facility the way a visiting one does. Take a position on whether zoos should keep pursuing the ark model, some narrower version of it, or shift toward funding in-situ conservation — and note that ex-situ and in-situ conservation are complementary rather than opposed, which is the distinction that keeps the argument honest.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Trace the zoo's shift from exhibition to conservation.
  • 02
    Explain genetic, ecosystem and economic challenges to ex-situ conservation.
  • 03
    Read a supplied article as an argument with a conclusion.
  • 04
    Distinguish ex-situ from in-situ conservation and their relationship.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

In response to the variable effects of conservation efforts and loss of biodiversity, zoos began to turn their attention to the conservation of endangered species and wildlife in the 1970s and 1980s. Supporting conservation efforts became an important goal for the modern zoo. A major milestone towards this goal was the Convention on Biodiversity which was signed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. As the modern zoo continues to focus its efforts towards conservation, it has been seen by many as a sort of “Noah’s Ark,” primarily focused on conserving the precious few endangered species. Unfortunately, genetic, ecosystem and economic issues have created challenges for the conservation model of the modern zoo. Read the following articles that expand on the conservation efforts of zoos and their use of technology towards this goal. Readings Keulartz, J. (2015). Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. Kobilinsky, D. (2016). New live cam technology might help conservation. Accessed August 13, 2016, at http://wildlife.org/new-live-cam-technology-might-help-conservation/. Genetics Research has shown that zoos currently hold about 15% of the endangered land animals in captivity. There remains a continual struggle to breed these animals due to low numbers. A zoo’s ability to maintain enough genetic variability among individual species is impossible and space limitations prevent expansion to allow the influx of more animals. Economics The secondary goal for many zoos, that of reintroduction to the wild, also faces challenges due to the costs involved, from financial to ecological. Animals living in captivity often lose the necessary skills to survive in the wild once released. Ecosystems Lastly, the ecosystems into which the captive animals are eventually released are constantly changing. Many factors may have affected their previous habitat, preventing the animal’s chance at a successful re-introduction to the wild. Education and Technology Technology and education have also been identified as important components in maintaining the biodiversity of the natural world. Zoos are in a unique position to educate the public about conservation issues and they are continually looking for ways to convey this information to visitors. The Metro Richmond Zoo uses video cam technology to encourage cheetah conservation by streaming live footage of cheetah litters online. Viewers witness the day-to-day lives of the cheetah cubs without human interference or disturbance. Answer the following questions in complete sentences using an essay format. See the SLP Assignment Expectations for further directions on formatting and organization. Assignment Directions: 1. Discuss how zoos have evolved over the past 50 years to become conservation centers. Incorporate the role of zoos in educating the public into your response. 2. Discuss some of the economic pressures faced by zoos—namely space, capacity, and resources—that can affect their conservation efforts. 3. How does a species get on the Endangered Species List? 4. Take a virtual trip to the zoo using one of the links below and observe at least one of the endangered species. Take a Virtual Visit to the Zoo Conservation Efforts You can take a virtual visit to the zoo any day of the week by tuning into any of the following live webcams, which feature many endangered animals. The World Wildlife Fund lists many of these animals as priority species. · Watch elephants at the Smithsonian Zoo on the elephant cam: · The Houston Zoo has some of the best webcams of gorillas, rhinos, elephants, flamingos, and giraffes here: http://www.houstonzoo.org/meet-the-animals/animal-webcams/ · The Reid Park Zoo in Arizona has webcams of lions, giraffes, elephants, lemurs, grizzly bears, and flamingos here: http://reidparkzoo.org/cameras/elephant-cam/ · See pandas, elephants, apes or polar bears (the elephant has the most informative cam view) at the San Diego Zoo · Pick an animal webcam of your choice 5. Make your own ethogram. An ethogram is a graph or chart of animal behavior that is used to compare certain behaviors that can be observed while animals are in captivity. Choose one animal from the webcam links above and observe its behavior at several different times during the day or over the course of several days. Take notes on its behavior using the ethnogram (include this chart in your essay). Choose 4 or 5 different time points (on the hour or half hour, it does not need to be the same day or the exact time point). Give your chart a title and include it in your essay. Ethogram Document 6. Did your perception of the species you watched change as a result of seeing it on the webcam? Why or why not? 7. Do you believe technology has a positive influence on people’s feelings toward wildlife and conservation? Why or why not? SLP Assignment Expectations Organize this essay assignment using subtitles that summarize the topic from each question above. For example, to answer Question 1, use a descriptive subtitle like the following: The Evolution of Zoos. Answer each question under the subtitle using complete sentences that relate back to the question. Be sure to use APA formatting throughout your essay with 1-inch margins, 12-point type, and double spacing throughout. Include a title page, introduction, answers to the questions with subtitles, and concluding paragraph. Remember to include in-text citations within the body of the essay referencing your resources (e.g., Murray, 2014). Also, be sure to include a reference section at the end of your assignment listing all required readings and any additional resources you used to complete your essay. A helpful guide to writing a quality essay can be found in Trident’s Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper. This guide also provides links to example essays written in APA format. Direct quotes should be limited and must be designated by quotation marks. Paraphrased ideas must give credit to the original author, for example: (Murray, 2014). Direct copying from “homework help” websites will not receive credit. Once you have completed your assignment within a Word document, please upload your final version to the SLP 1 Dropbox. Please also note your Turnitin originality score and make revisions as needed. Please contact your instructor with any questions.
02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    The historical shift toward conservation as a zoo goal.
  2. 02
    Genetic challenges, including small population effects.
  3. 03
    Ecosystem challenges, including habitat and behaviour.
  4. 04
    Economic challenges, including which species attract funding.
  5. 05
    The contribution and limits of the technology described.
  6. 06
    A position on the ark model, with reasons.
03

The shift to conservation, the three challenges, then technology

01

From menagerie to conservation

Trace the shift and the role of the 1992 Convention.

02

Genetic challenges

Explain small population genetics in captive collections.

03

Ecosystem challenges

Address habitat loss and behavioural competence for reintroduction.

04

Economic challenges

Explain how funding follows visitors rather than endangerment.

05

What technology adds

Assess remote monitoring and public engagement.

06

A position on the model

Argue for continuing, narrowing or shifting the approach.

04

Reading Keulartz and the technology piece against each other

Recommended databases

  • The supplied readings
  • IPBES
  • World Health Organization
  • Conservation biology journals

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Read Keulartz for its conclusion, not just its examples.
  2. 2.
    Look up small population genetics before writing that section.
  3. 3.
    Find reintroduction success rate data rather than assuming it.
  4. 4.
    Check funding distribution across taxa for the economic section.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

    IPBES · 2019

    The global assessment of biodiversity loss — the scale the ark model is responding to.

  2. 02

    Summary of the Endangered Species Act

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · 2025

    The legal framework for species protection and what it requires.

  3. 03

    Biodiversity

    World Health Organization · 2025

    Why biodiversity loss matters beyond the species themselves.

  4. 04

    1.1 What Is Sociology?

    OpenStax, Introduction to Sociology 3e · 2021

    The public engagement argument, which is a social claim rather than a biological one.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Repeating the Noah's Ark metaphor without examining it.
  • Merging the three challenge categories the prompt names separately.
  • Treating the supplied readings as background rather than as arguments.
  • Presenting ex-situ and in-situ conservation as opposed alternatives.

Submission checklist

  • Are all three challenge categories addressed separately?
  • Have you stated what Keulartz concludes?
  • Does the technology section say what it cannot replace?
  • Is your position on the ark model stated with reasons?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order