BSN-FP 4010 windshield survey report: planning guide
The windshield survey is only half this assessment: after observing a 2-3 square mile neighborhood, you must pick one vulnerable population you actually saw and chase it through Census demographics, health-risk statistics, and social determinants — because the whole course builds a wellness program on what you find here.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 11, 2026
What links the windshield survey to the research half?
The structure hides a handoff most reports fumble: the assessment starts as fieldwork and ends as desk research, and the bridge between them is the population you choose. The brief's sequence is deliberate — observe the neighborhood, describe a vulnerable or diverse population you observed living there, and then research that population's demographic change over five to ten years, its most prevalent health risks with statistics, and its health disparities and social determinants. Choose the population with the research half in mind: it must be one you genuinely observed (the report says so), but also one whose data exists at a findable grain — the brief even names your sources, the Census Bureau, state sites, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A population you can see but cannot source strands the second half of the paper.
The fieldwork half has its own stated discipline. Boundaries first: 2-3 square miles, one to two hours, car, foot or bike, with the route mapped ahead and — the brief's own practical advice — ideally a second person driving while you observe. Use the provided template as your note-taking instrument, stop frequently, and if possible survey at more than one time of day, because the brief flags timing as an observational variable. Objectivity is graded here: the description of housing conditions, open spaces, businesses, services and transportation should read as evidence a teammate could verify, not as impressions. The template also standardises what counts as an observation, which quietly protects the report's objectivity when a teammate compares notes. Field notes that name streets and counts beat adjectives every time. Timing notes belong in the report too.
Two requirements sit outside the content and catch people. The report is written for your interdisciplinary team, and the brief asks you to mirror your organization's own document formats where possible while keeping APA for citations — an unusual instruction worth following visibly. And the statistics requirement on health risks is explicit: frequency of occurrence and deaths per year in the population, not adjectives like 'common'. The closing question — what will you need to overcome to build a successful health promotion program — is the course's thesis statement: everything you report here becomes the needs assessment for the wellness program assessments that follow. Write the closing paragraph as though Assessment 2 already exists, because in this course it does. Everything else in the report is evidence collected for that sentence. Name the obstacle plainly and the next assessment starts itself.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Plan and execute a bounded windshield survey — route, timing, template, safety — per the brief's stated method.
- 02Describe a neighborhood objectively enough that observations read as verifiable evidence.
- 03Select an observed vulnerable population whose demographic and health data are findable in Census, state and BLS sources.
- 04Report health risks with the required statistics: frequency in the population and deaths per year.
- 05Frame disparities and social determinants as the obstacles a future wellness program must overcome.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A completed windshield survey of a neighborhood no larger than 2-3 square miles, documented on the provided template.
- 02A 3-5 page report (excluding title and reference pages) for the interdisciplinary team, mirroring organizational document formats where possible with APA citations.
- 03The brief's required content: neighborhood description, an observed vulnerable or diverse population, its 5-10 year demographic change, prevalent health risks with statistics, and the health disparities and social determinants affecting it.
- 04At least three professional, scholarly, or government resources in current APA.
How should the observation-to-research report flow?
The survey as designed fieldwork
Report the method briefly — boundaries, route, timing, template — then describe the neighborhood's condition, spaces, businesses, services and transportation as observed evidence.
The population you saw
Identify the vulnerable or diverse population observed in the neighborhood and the observational evidence for their presence — the bridge sentence between fieldwork and research.
The demographic arc
Document how the population's demographics have shifted over 5-10 years using Census, state, or BLS data — the change leadership noticed is the scenario's premise, and this section proves or shapes it.
Health risks, with numbers
Present the population's most prevalent health risks with the mandated statistics — frequency in the population, deaths per year — from government health data.
Disparities, determinants, and the program to come
Identify the health disparities and social determinants affecting the population, framed as the brief frames them: the obstacles a successful health promotion and disease prevention program will have to overcome.
Where do the demographic and health-risk numbers come from?
Recommended databases
- U.S. Census Bureau
- Bureau of Labor Statistics
- State health department data
- Community Tool Box
Search sequence
- 1.Read the Community Tool Box windshield survey guide before the fieldwork for observation technique and note discipline.
- 2.Pull the neighborhood's demographic trend from Census QuickFacts or American Community Survey data at the closest available geography.
- 3.Find the population's health-risk statistics — prevalence and mortality — from CDC, state health department, or county data.
- 4.Read the Healthy People 2030 social determinants framework to organise the disparities section in its standard domains.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Windshield and Walking Surveys
Community Tool Box, University of Kansas · 2023
The methodology reference for the fieldwork half — what to observe, how to record it, and how to stay objective — matching the brief's own description of the technique.
- 02
QuickFacts
U.S. Census Bureau · 2024
The entry point for the 5-10 year demographic change section the brief requires, at county and place level — the source the brief itself names first.
- 03
Social Determinants of Health
Healthy People 2030, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · 2020
The standard five-domain framework for the disparities and determinants section, and the vocabulary that connects them to the health promotion program the course is building toward.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Choosing a vulnerable population for its visibility rather than its data trail, then discovering the Census cannot resolve it at neighborhood grain — the research half needs sourceable numbers.
- Writing the neighborhood description as impressions ('run-down', 'friendly') instead of observations a teammate could verify — objectivity is stated in the brief.
- Reporting health risks without the required statistics; the brief explicitly asks for frequency and deaths per year, and 'diabetes is common among seniors' satisfies neither.
- Surveying without the template or at a single time of day when the brief recommends both the instrument and repeated timing.
- Ignoring the format instruction — the report is for your team and should echo organizational document conventions, an instruction unusual enough that following it is visible.
- Treating the disparities section as a list instead of answering the brief's own framing: what must be overcome for the future wellness program to succeed.
Submission checklist
- Survey area within 2-3 square miles; route and timing noted in the report.
- Template used and observations dated.
- The chosen population is explicitly one observed during the survey.
- Demographic change covers 5-10 years with a named source (Census, state, BLS).
- Each health risk carries frequency and mortality statistics.
- Disparities/SDOH section ends by naming what the wellness program must overcome.
- 3-5 pages plus title and reference pages; three or more professional/scholarly/government sources in APA.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.