BUS311 Week 3 final paper proposal: outline guide
This proposal is graded now but designed to be cashed in two weeks later: an introduction with a working thesis, headings that each carry a two-to-three sentence commitment, and a references page that fronts the Final Paper's five-scholarly-source minimum before the paper exists.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 11, 2026
What is the Week 3 proposal actually committing you to?
The first instruction — review the Week Five Final Paper instructions — is the assignment's real center of gravity, because everything the proposal contains is a promise against that later brief. The outline you submit is a contract: an introduction with a thesis statement the final paper will defend, major headings that partition the argument, and a references page proving the source base already exists. Write it backwards from the final paper's requirements, not forwards from a blank page: pick the topic the Week Five options allow, draft the thesis, and only then let the headings fall out of what the thesis must prove. A proposal built this way also survives instructor feedback, because changes land on headings rather than on a finished draft. Two weeks is short; spend the planning where it compounds.
The two-to-three sentence descriptions under each heading are where this assignment is actually graded, and they have a failure mode: describing the topic instead of the intended argument. 'This section will discuss negligence' commits to nothing; 'This section will apply the four elements of negligence to the scenario and argue that causation is the contested element' commits to an analysis the grader can evaluate. Write each description as what you will claim and show, not what area you will visit — that is the difference between an outline that guides the final paper and one that merely gestures at it. Descriptions written as commitments also make the final paper faster to write, since each section starts with its claim already chosen. The grader reads these as previews of quality.
The references requirement is stricter than it looks: the Final Paper requires a minimum of five scholarly sources, and the proposal's references page must present them now, as complete APA bibliographic citations. That forces the research forward — you cannot cite five scholarly sources you have not found — which is precisely the design: the proposal exists to prevent the Week Five paper from being researched the night before. Choose sources you have actually opened, because a proposal citing sources that later prove irrelevant forces a rewrite the schedule does not accommodate. Two to three pages excluding title and reference pages, APA throughout, and the brief closes by pointing at the grading rubric — read it first, since an outline is exactly the kind of deliverable a rubric grades line by line. That sequencing pressure is the assignment.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Reverse-engineer the proposal from the Week Five Final Paper instructions rather than drafting it cold.
- 02Write a working thesis statement that takes a defensible position the final paper can support.
- 03Convert each major heading into a two-to-three sentence argumentative commitment, not a topic label.
- 04Assemble and correctly cite five or more scholarly sources in APA before the final paper is written.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Ashford 4: – Week 3 – Assignment ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An introduction with a thesis statement for the Final Paper.
- 02An outline of major headings, each with a two-to-three sentence description of what will be discussed under it.
- 03A references page with complete APA bibliographic citations for the sources to be used — the Final Paper's minimum is five scholarly sources.
- 04Two to three pages excluding title and reference pages, APA-formatted per the writing center's guidance.
How should the proposal's parts be built, in what order?
Read Week Five first
Extract the Final Paper's topic options, required elements and evaluation criteria — the specification this proposal must satisfy in miniature.
The thesis and introduction
Draft the introduction around a thesis that takes a position the paper can defend with the sources you have — narrow enough to be arguable in the final paper's length.
Headings as commitments
Partition the argument into major headings and write each description as the section's intended claim and evidence — two to three sentences that a grader could later check the final paper against.
The references page, front-loaded
Present the five-plus scholarly sources in complete APA citations, matched to headings so each section's evidence base is visible.
Which writing guides sharpen the thesis and outline?
Recommended databases
- University library databases (for the five scholarly sources)
- Purdue OWL
- Writing center resources named in the brief
Search sequence
- 1.Read the Week Five Final Paper instructions and the grading rubric before anything else.
- 2.Use the thesis-statement guidance to draft and stress-test the thesis: does it take a position the sources can defend?
- 3.Search the library databases for the five scholarly sources, opening each to confirm relevance before citing it.
- 4.Map each source to a heading, so the outline demonstrates the research is done rather than promised.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Creating a Thesis Statement, Thesis Statement Tips
Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) · 2024
The standard for a working thesis — position-taking, arguable, scoped — against which to test the proposal's central sentence.
- 02
Developing Strong Thesis Statements
Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) · 2024
The argumentation frame for turning heading descriptions into claims — what makes a statement debatable and supportable, which is what each outline section must promise.
- 03
Argument Papers
Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) · 2024
The structure of an argument paper — the genre the Final Paper will be — useful for choosing major headings that partition an argument rather than a topic.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Writing the proposal before reading the Week Five instructions, which the brief lists as the first step because every proposal element answers that later assignment.
- Submitting a thesis that states the topic instead of a position — 'this paper examines contract law' is a subject line, not a thesis.
- Filling heading descriptions with 'will discuss X' topic-visits instead of the claims and analysis each section will deliver.
- Listing fewer than five scholarly sources, or padding with non-scholarly ones, when the Final Paper's stated minimum is five and the proposal is where it is enforced.
- Citing sources by title alone — the brief demands complete bibliographic citations in APA form.
- Skipping the grading rubric the brief explicitly points to, on the deliverable type rubrics grade most mechanically.
Submission checklist
- Week Five Final Paper instructions reviewed and the proposal built against them.
- Introduction present with a one-sentence, position-taking thesis.
- Every major heading carries a two-to-three sentence description of intended claims.
- References page lists five or more scholarly sources in complete APA citations, each actually opened.
- 2-3 pages excluding title and references; rubric reviewed.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.