Combining qualitative and quantitative nursing methods
The prompt concedes that the theoretical foundations differ, which is an invitation to take that seriously rather than to endorse mixed methods as obviously sensible.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 15, 2026
Mixed methods, and the theoretical tension is real
The prompt hands you the tension and it is worth engaging rather than smoothing over. Qualitative and quantitative methods do rest on different assumptions about what reality is and how it can be known — broadly, a constructivist position holding that meaning is made and contextual, against a positivist or post-positivist one holding that regularities exist and can be measured. Methodological purists have argued that combining them is incoherent, on the grounds that two contradictory sets of assumptions cannot both hold within one study. The pragmatist response, which is what most mixed methods work rests on, is that the research question should govern the method rather than the philosophy, and that a question with both a how-much and a why component needs both kinds of evidence. Naming that debate in a single sentence is what makes a 250-word answer look informed rather than merely agreeable.
For advantages, be specific about what each adds rather than asserting that combination improves validity. Qualitative work can generate the constructs a survey then measures, explain a quantitative finding that makes no sense on its own, and surface the outcomes patients actually care about; quantitative work establishes how widely a qualitative finding holds. Triangulation strengthens a conclusion when two methods converge on the same answer and, more usefully still, tells you something is wrong somewhere when they do not. The disadvantages are practical and real: mixed methods studies take longer, cost more, and demand competence in both traditions, and a researcher strong in one very often produces a thin and unconvincing version of the other. Note also that reliability and validity mean different things in the two traditions, so saying that combining them increases both is looser than it sounds and worth stating carefully rather than repeating from the prompt.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Explain the philosophical tension between the two traditions.
- 02Identify what each method contributes that the other cannot.
- 03Recognise that validity and reliability carry different meanings in each tradition.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Discussion: Methods in a nursing study Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Discussion: Methods in a nursing study
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An answer of 200-250 words.
- 02Specific advantages naming what each method adds.
- 03Practical disadvantages including competence and cost.
- 04Current evidence-based literature cited in APA format.
Advantages, disadvantages, then a judgement
Name the tension
State the differing assumptions and the purist objection to combining them.
The pragmatist resolution
Explain that the research question governs method choice in most mixed methods work.
What each contributes
Show qualitative generating constructs and explaining findings, quantitative establishing extent.
Divergence as information
Explain that methods disagreeing is a finding rather than a failure.
The practical costs
Name time, funding and dual competence as real constraints.
Mixed methods designs in nursing research
Recommended databases
- Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- CINAHL
- PubMed
- Your research methods text
- Nursing Research
Search sequence
- 1.Read a current account of mixed methods designs so you can name one rather than describing combination generally.
- 2.Find a published nursing mixed methods study to draw concrete advantages from.
- 3.Look for methodological critique, which supplies the disadvantages with citations.
- 4.Apply a recency filter, since the brief asks for current evidence-based literature.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Asking Focused Questions
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford · 2024
Shows how question structure determines appropriate method, which is the pragmatist argument in practical form.
- 02
Hypothesis Testing, P Values, Confidence Intervals, and Significance
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
The quantitative tradition's account of validity and inference, one half of the definitional problem.
- 03
Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · 2019
A grounded theory study, illustrating what qualitative work establishes that measurement alone cannot.
- 04
A sense of belonging and perceived stress among baccalaureate nursing students in clinical placements
Nurse Education Today, via PubMed · 2016
A quantitative study using validated instruments, useful as the contrasting example of what measurement adds.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Endorsing mixed methods without engaging the theoretical tension the prompt names.
- Claiming combination improves validity without saying whose definition of validity.
- Listing advantages generically rather than naming what each method contributes.
- Ignoring the practical cost and competence constraints.
Submission checklist
- Is the philosophical tension acknowledged rather than smoothed over?
- Does each advantage name what one method adds to the other?
- Are the practical disadvantages included?
- Is the literature current and cited?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.