Community health assessment windshield survey guide
A discussion assignment of at least 1,000 words in APA format, Arial 12: carry out a community health assessment and windshield survey of the community where you live, state its zip code on the first page, and support the work with at least two evidence-based references under five years old, not counting the class textbook.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 12, 2026
Why are the CDC's assessment principles quoted before the question?
The background paragraphs are not background. The brief quotes the CDC's definition of a community health assessment and then lists the principles such assessments use — multisector collaboration, proactive and diverse community engagement, a definition of community wide enough for population-level intervention but targeted enough to address disparities, transparency, evidence-based interventions, evaluation, and high-quality pooled data. That list is the marking criteria in the costume of an introduction. A submission that quotes the definition and then describes a neighbourhood has ignored it; a submission that assesses its community against those principles in turn has answered the question that was actually asked. Work through them explicitly, even briefly, and the structure of the whole piece falls out of the prompt at no cost. It also solves the word count, which is otherwise the hardest thing about this assignment: seven principles at a hundred words each is most of the thousand.
The zip code requirement is a verification device and it changes what you can write. Naming the zip code on the first page means every claim you make is checkable, so generic statements about "my community" stop working. It also unlocks the data half of the assignment, which is where half the word count lives: with a zip code you can retrieve income, insurance coverage, age structure, household language and vehicle access figures at small-area geography, and those numbers are what turn observations into an assessment rather than an impression. The instruction is repeated twice in the brief — the assessment must be from the community you live in, not from another one — which usually means enough students have submitted otherwise for the instructor to start repeating themselves. Take it as a hard constraint rather than a preference, and resist the temptation to write about a more interesting neighbourhood you know better.
A windshield survey is defined in the brief as subjective observation gathered while driving or walking, and that definition rules out the shortcut most people take. Census tables are not a windshield survey. What you observed is the point: housing condition and density, the state of the streets and public spaces, what businesses are present and which are absent, where people gather, what the food retail looks like, whether there are pharmacies, clinics, parks, bus stops. Keep the observational and the statistical strands visibly separate in the write-up and then bring them together, because the interesting sentences are the ones where the two disagree with each other. A neighbourhood whose figures look adequate and whose streets look neglected is a finding, and it is the kind of finding that earns marks in a piece this length, where description alone will not fill the space convincingly.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Assess a community against the stated principles of a community health assessment.
- 02Distinguish observational windshield data from retrieved statistical data.
- 03Retrieve and use small-area demographic data for a named zip code.
- 04Identify where observation and statistics disagree, and treat that as a finding.
- 05Meet a word count with analysis rather than with description.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.Community Health Assessment / Windshield Discussion 2
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A discussion submission of at least 1,000 words, in APA format, as a Word document in Arial 12.
- 02A community health assessment and windshield survey of the community where you live.
- 03The zip code of that community stated on the first page.
- 04At least two evidence-based references published within the last five years, not counting the class textbook.
- 05Compliance with the syllabus discussion question participation and submission guidelines.
Observation and data, kept apart and then brought together
Name the community
State the zip code, define the boundaries you walked or drove, and say when you observed.
The windshield survey
Report what you observed: housing, streets, public space, retail, transport, health facilities, where people gather.
The statistical picture
Retrieve zip-code level figures on income, insurance, age, language and vehicle access.
Where the two disagree
Identify at least one point where the observed and the recorded pictures diverge, and say what it might mean.
Against the CDC principles
Assess the community's health assessment environment against each quoted principle in turn.
Priority and close
Name the health issue the assessment points to, and say what evidence supports treating it as the priority.
Where zip-code level community health data can be found
Recommended databases
- US Census Bureau
- County or state health department
- Healthy People 2030
- PubMed
Search sequence
- 1.Do the observational survey before looking at any data, so what you notice is not pre-shaped by the statistics.
- 2.Retrieve zip-code level figures immediately afterwards, while the observations are fresh.
- 3.Search for evidence on the one health issue your observations point to, filtered to the last five years.
- 4.Check the county health department for any existing community health assessment covering your area.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity
National Academies, NCBI Bookshelf · 2017
Evidence connecting neighbourhood conditions to health outcomes, which is what lets an observation become an assessment rather than a description.
- 02
Social Determinants of Health
Healthy People 2030, odphp.health.gov · 2024
A five-domain structure for organising what you observed, and national targets to compare your community against.
- 03
Public health interventions: Applications for nursing practice (The Wheel Manual)
Minnesota Department of Health · 2019
Vocabulary for the closing section, where the assessment points towards what a community health nurse would actually do next.
- 04
Food Security in the U.S.
USDA Economic Research Service · 2025
Measured indicators for food retail access, one of the most visible things a windshield survey picks up and one of the easiest to support with data.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Treating the quoted CDC principles as background rather than as the criteria to assess against.
- Substituting census tables for the observational survey the brief defines.
- Writing about a community other than the one you live in, which the brief rules out twice.
- Omitting the zip code, which is the verification the whole assignment rests on.
- Padding to 1,000 words with description instead of analysis.
- Counting the class textbook towards the two required references, which the brief excludes.
- Using references older than five years.
Submission checklist
- The zip code appears on the first page.
- The community assessed is the one you live in.
- Each of the CDC principles quoted in the brief is addressed.
- Observational findings are clearly distinguished from retrieved data.
- At least one point where observation and data diverge is identified and discussed.
- Two or more evidence-based references, all within five years, none of them the class textbook.
- At least 1,000 words, Arial 12, APA format, submitted as a Word document.
- The discussion board title matches what the syllabus specifies.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.