Practice-based research plan and examined design guide
Identify a practice issue or problem, develop a plan for practice-based research using existing practice data as the focus of inquiry, and develop an examined practice design that includes all elements of the model, in 700 to 850 words.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 14, 2026
Existing data as the starting point, not new data
The prompt draws its own distinction and the whole assignment turns on holding it. Evidence-based practice applies research produced elsewhere to guide what you do. Practice-based research runs the other way: practice is the focus of inquiry, and the data are the ones practice already generates — clinical notes, observations, organisational and institutional policy statements, electronic health records. This is what the prompt calls real-world evidence, data produced outside the conduct of clinical trials. So the practice issue you choose has to be one your setting already leaves a record of. Missed appointments, unplanned returns within a week, documentation gaps at handover, variation in how a protocol is applied between shifts, and referrals that go nowhere are all visible in existing records. A question that could only be answered by recruiting participants and randomising them has left the model behind. Say in one sentence which record you would pull first, and the plan stops being hypothetical.
The second half asks for an examined practice design including all elements of the model, so structure it explicitly and name the parts. A defensible sequence is: state the practice problem and how you know it exists; identify the existing data sources and what each can and cannot show; specify the inquiry question in terms those sources can answer; describe how you will examine the data, including whether the approach is qualitative, quantitative or both; address consent, privacy and the boundary between quality improvement and research, since using records for inquiry raises a review question your institution will have a policy about; state what a finding would look like; and say what new or creative strategy could emerge and how you would test it. At 700 to 850 words each element gets a short paragraph, so plan the allocation before writing rather than discovering it at word 800.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Distinguish practice-based research from evidence-based practice.
- 02Select a practice problem that existing records can actually illuminate.
- 03Identify real-world data sources and their limits.
- 04Set out an examined practice design element by element.
- 05Address the research and quality improvement review boundary.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Develop a plan for practice-based research Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Develop a plan for practice-based research
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01An identified practice issue or problem.
- 02A plan for practice-based research grounded in existing data.
- 03An examined practice design containing all elements of the model.
- 04A statement of privacy, consent and review considerations.
- 05A word count between 700 and 850.
The problem, the plan, then the design
The practice problem
State the problem and the existing record that shows it exists.
Why practice-based rather than evidence-based
Hold the distinction the prompt draws and justify the approach.
Data sources and their limits
Name the records available and what each can and cannot show.
The examined practice design
Set out each element of the model in order and label it.
Ethics, review and what would emerge
Address privacy and review, then say what a finding would enable.
Real-world evidence and where it comes from
Recommended databases
- StatPearls via NCBI Bookshelf
- PubMed and MEDLINE
- Cochrane Library
- Your institution's review board guidance
- Your unit's audit, incident and record systems
Search sequence
- 1.List the data your setting already produces before choosing a problem.
- 2.Read a definition of real-world evidence and note what excludes trials.
- 3.Find your institution's guidance on records use and review requirements.
- 4.Read one published practice inquiry that used routine data.
- 5.Allocate words to each design element before drafting.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Nursing Professional Development Evidence-Based Practice
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
The evidence-based practice model the prompt defines practice-based research against.
- 02
Quality Improvement Methods (LEAN, PDSA, SIX SIGMA)
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
The methods most likely to be confused with research, which is why review status matters.
- 03
Continuous Quality Improvement
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
How routinely collected data is used for inquiry and improvement cycles.
- 04
PubMed® and MEDLINE®: Additional Resources
National Library of Medicine · 2024
Route to published examples of inquiry built on routinely collected data.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Proposing a study that requires recruiting participants, which leaves the model.
- Choosing a problem your setting keeps no record of.
- Describing the design in prose without naming its elements.
- Ignoring the quality improvement versus research review question entirely.
- Overstating what routine records can demonstrate.
- Missing the word range by treating the design section as a conclusion.
Submission checklist
- The practice problem is one existing data could evidence.
- Data sources are named and their limits stated.
- Every element of the examined practice design is labelled.
- Privacy and review considerations are addressed.
- The distinction from evidence-based practice is explicit.
- The paper is between 700 and 850 words.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.