Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
NursingLiterature reviewEvidence-based practice

DNP 8114 Module 4: literature review assignment

The summary tool is graded on the quality of thought in it, not on being filled in — and the seven-page paper has to synthesise across the ten articles rather than describe them one after another.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 15, 2026

01

Two parts, one deadline, and a template that is graded

The structure is unusual and the timing catches people out: nothing is submitted in Week 8 or Week 9, and both parts land together at Day 7 of Week 10. That means the work has to be paced against a deadline with no intermediate checkpoint, and the literature search is the part that expands to fill whatever time it is given. Start by revising the critical practice question from the Week 7 discussion, because a vague question produces an unfocused search and every later step inherits the vagueness. A usable question names a population, a practice problem and an outcome you could observe. Then search the Walden Library rather than a general search engine, and hold the five-year currency limit as a filter you set at the start rather than a check you apply at the end. Ten articles retrieved and then culled for age is a wasted week.

Two things about the deliverables are worth being explicit about. The Individual Evidence Summary Tool is graded on the quality of information and thought captured in it, not on completeness — so the appraisal columns matter more than the bibliographic ones, and a matrix with ten accurately transcribed citations and empty judgement is a weak submission. And the seven-page paper asks for synthesis, which means organising by finding rather than by article: what do these ten together establish, where do they disagree, what does the disagreement turn on, and what is still unaddressed. The paper's second requirement is a chain — practice problem to critical question to appraised evidence to the case for a quality improvement initiative — and it asks for specifics and examples, so name your setting and your outcome rather than arguing that practice change is generally warranted. Walden's formatting requirements apply: title page, introduction, summary, references.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Revise a practice question into a searchable, focused form.
  • 02
    Appraise rather than merely collect ten current scholarly articles.
  • 03
    Synthesise evidence by finding rather than by article.
  • 04
    Argue a chain from practice problem to the need for a change initiative.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

DNP 8114 Module 4 Assignment Investigating a Critical Practice Question Through a Literature Review DNP 8114 Investigating a Critical Practice Question Through a Literature Review This week you will begin your Module 4 Assignment, which is intended to inform and support your planning for your DNP Project in your program of study. This Assignment has two parts: a literature review in the Walden Library of research to address the critical practice question that you framed in Week 7, and a critical assessment of your search outcomes in which you synthesize the evidence. Both Parts 1 and 2 will be due by Day 7 of Week 10. Plan your time accordingly. To prepare: Analyze your critical practice question from the Week 7 Discussion. Based on feedback from colleagues and your Instructor, revise your question, as necessary, to ensure a clear and relevant focus for your literature search. Review the Learning Resources to support your search. Access the Individual Evidence Summary Tool Template document from the Learning Resources. This is a fillable PDF document that you will complete with at least 10 scholarly articles relevant to your critical practice question. Scan the template to ensure you understand how to enter information for each article you identify. Use the Week 8 Discussion to guide and clarify your search process and to pose any questions related to the template categories, search terms, or others. The Assignment Part 1: Literature Review (10+ scholarly articles) Using the Walden Library as your source, search to select at least 10 scholarly articles that represent current literature (i.e., published within the previous 5 years) with evidence that addresses your critical question and could inform a practice change initiative for quality improvement. Using the Individual Evidence Summary Tool template document, complete all sections for each article. Part 2: Critical Assessment (7+ pages) In a paper of at least 7 pages, plus cover page and references page, include the following: Write a critical assessment of your search outcomes that synthesizes the evidence from your literature review. Demonstrate clear connections between the practice problem that informs your critical question, your appraisal of evidence that addresses the critical question, and resulting clarification on the need for a practice change initiative focusing on quality improvement. Be specific and provide examples. Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting. There is no submission due this week. Complete Parts 1 and 2 of your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10. What’s Coming Up in Week 9? Next week you will continue your literature search in the Walden Library and begin appraising the evidence in the scholarly resources you are gathering. You should be using the Individual Evidence Summary Tool template to record required information about each resource you select, and to support your analysis and evaluation process. There is no Discussion this week, to provide maximum time for your literature review. Keep in mind your Module 4 Assignment includes a critical assessment paper, which is also due by Day 7 of Week 10. Be sure to contact your Instructor with questions or concerns regarding this Assignment. Looking Ahead: Week 10 Discussion Week 10 includes a Discussion in which you will share preliminary outcomes and analysis from your literature review with colleagues. Your initial post is due by Day 3. Plan your time accordingly in Week 9 to ensure you are prepared for both the Week 10 Discussion and completing your Module 4 Assignment. Module 4 Investigating a Critical Practice Question Through a Literature Review Continue to develop your literature review of at least 10 current (published within the last 5 years) scholarly articles from the Walden Library with evidence that addresses your critical practice question. This week, review the Learning Resources for guidance in appraising the research in the articles you select. Keep in mind you must complete and submit the Individual Evidence Summary Tool, available in the Learning Resources, and will be graded based on the quality of information and thought captured in this matrix document. When you complete your analysis and evaluation of the evidence, begin your critical assessment paper in which you synthesize evidence from your literature review. This paper is also due by Day 7 of next week. Plan your time accordingly. Review the Module 4 Assignment Rubric for the grading points and expectations of this two-part Assignment. There is no submission due this week. Submit your Module 4 Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10. Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting. Module 4 Investigating a Critical Practice Question Through a Literature Review Complete Parts 1 and 2 of your Assignment: Part 1: Literature Review: Be sure you have completed all required sections of the template (PDF) document. Part 2: Critical Assessment paper: Reflect on comments from colleagues in response to your Week 10 Discussion post. Apply feedback of value to you in completing your synthesis of evidence to inform a practice change initiative focusing on quality improvement. DNP 8114 Module 4 Assignment Investigating a Critical Practice Question Through a Literature Review Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting. By Day 7 of Week 10 Submit Parts 1 and 2 of your Assignment. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. Click the Module 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. Click the Module 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    A revised critical practice question.
  2. 02
    At least ten scholarly articles from the previous five years.
  3. 03
    A fully completed Individual Evidence Summary Tool for each article.
  4. 04
    A critical assessment paper of at least seven pages, synthesising the evidence.
  5. 05
    Title page, introduction, summary and references in the required format.
03

Revise the question, search, summarise, then synthesise

01

Revise the critical question

Sharpen the Week 7 question using the feedback you received.

02

Search and select

Run a Walden Library search filtered to the last five years and select ten articles.

03

Complete the summary tool

Record appraisal as well as description for each article.

04

Write the critical assessment

Synthesise by finding and connect problem, evidence and the change initiative.

04

Ten current articles, appraised not collected

Recommended databases

  • Walden Library
  • CINAHL
  • PubMed Central
  • The Cochrane Library

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Set the five-year date filter before running any search rather than after.
  2. 2.
    Record search terms and databases as you go, since the paper reports the process.
  3. 3.
    Complete the summary tool entry immediately after reading each article, not in a batch.
  4. 4.
    Group findings across articles before drafting, so the paper is organised by theme.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

    BMJ · 2021

    The reporting standard for a literature search, which is the model for describing your own process.

  2. 02

    CASP Checklists

    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme · 2024

    Design-specific appraisal checklists, which is what turns the summary tool's judgement columns into something defensible.

  3. 03

    JBI Critical Appraisal Tools

    JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute), University of Adelaide · 2024

    A second appraisal instrument set, useful when your ten articles span several designs.

  4. 04

    Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) for assessing multiple types of evidence

    Canada Communicable Disease Report · 2017

    A toolkit for appraising mixed evidence types, which is the common case for a practice question.

  5. 05

    Asking Focused Questions

    Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford · 2024

    The framing discipline your revised critical question has to satisfy before the search can work.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Leaving the search until Week 10 because nothing is due before then.
  • Filling the summary tool bibliographically and leaving the appraisal columns thin.
  • Writing the paper article by article rather than finding by finding.
  • Arguing for practice change in general instead of in a named setting.
  • Including articles older than five years to reach ten.

Submission checklist

  • Is your revised question specific enough to search?
  • Are all ten articles within the last five years?
  • Does the summary tool contain judgement, not just citations?
  • Is the paper organised by finding rather than by source?
  • Does the chain from problem to change initiative hold with examples?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order