Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
Public healthWritten assignmentCommunity health assessment

Healthy People 2020: three community problems and a plan

A 1,500 word APA paper reviewing the Healthy People 2020 initiative's objectives, goals and indicators, then using your city or county public health department or the CDC to choose three population or community based problems from the topics listed there, discussing how each affects your community, how each was identified, and a plan of action to contain them based on Healthy People 2020, including the zip code of the chosen area and a minimum of four evidence-based references in Arial 12.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 13, 2026

01

Choose the area before the problems

One requirement changes the whole shape of this paper and it appears almost as an aside: you must include the zip code of the city or county you choose. That is not a formatting detail, it is the assignment's way of forcing local data. A paper about obesity in America will satisfy none of the three tasks the prompt sets, because it cannot say how the problem affects your community, cannot say how it was identified locally, and cannot propose a containment plan with anyone in it. So choose your area first, find out what data actually exists for it, and let that determine your three problems. County health rankings, state and local health department reports, and CDC data portals will all disaggregate to county level, and some to zip code. If your three problems have no local numbers behind them, you have chosen the wrong three and it is much cheaper to discover that now.

The prompt offers two routes and they lead to different papers, so choose deliberately rather than mixing them. The first route is three population or community based problems drawn from the Healthy People topic areas: disease, disaster, crime, accidents, falls and so on. The second, offered as an alternative, is three community infectious outbreaks identified from the CDC outbreak listings, measles being the example given. The first route gives you chronic and injury topics with rich local surveillance data and slow-moving indicators. The second gives you acute events with clear identification stories and containment plans that are genuinely operational, which suits the assignment's language about how they were identified and how to contain them. The outbreak route is usually the stronger paper if your area has had a real event, because every part of the prompt has an answer that is documented somewhere. Say in the paper which route you took and why, since the marker cannot otherwise tell.

How they were identified is the requirement most papers pass over and it is worth a section of its own for each problem. Identification is a real process with named mechanisms: notifiable disease reporting from clinicians and laboratories, syndromic surveillance of emergency department presentations, vital statistics, hospital discharge data, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, trauma registries, and for outbreaks, case finding that begins with a clinician noticing something unusual and telephoning a health department. Say which mechanism found your problem, because the answer explains a great deal about how quickly it was found and what was missed. Falls in older adults show up in emergency department data long after the first fall; a measles cluster shows up when one alert clinician makes a call. That contrast is exactly the kind of analysis this section rewards. Say also what each system would have missed, because that is the limitation the plan has to work around.

The plan of action must be based on Healthy People 2020, so it should connect to the framework's actual structure rather than merely cite it. That means naming the topic area and the specific objective your plan addresses, using the objective's own baseline and target as the measure of success, and referring to the leading health indicators where they apply. A plan that says we will raise awareness is not a plan; a plan that names the objective, states the local baseline, sets an interim target, identifies who does what, and says how it will be measured is one. Address the social and environmental determinants too, since Healthy People 2020 built them into its framework and containment plans that ignore transport, housing or language access fail for predictable reasons rather than mysterious ones. Name the objective by its number where the framework gives one, so the connection is checkable.

On execution, the formatting requirements are specific and each is checkable: APA format, a minimum of 1,500 words excluding the title and reference pages, Arial 12, at least four evidence-based references, and the zip code stated. Electronic references must be from reliable sources such as the CDC, so a health department report or a peer-reviewed article counts and a news article generally does not. The paper goes to Turnitin and the stated tolerance is 35 percent, which means direct quotation from the Healthy People objectives should be sparing and paraphrase should be genuine rather than word-swapping. Because it is also posted to the discussion tab for peers to review, write it so a classmate in a different county can compare their area to yours, and be explicit about which findings are local and which are national. Say which county you are writing about early enough that a reader knows what to compare.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Select a geographic area for which local health data actually exists.
  • 02
    Choose between the topic-area route and the outbreak route deliberately.
  • 03
    Name the surveillance mechanism that identified each problem.
  • 04
    Tie a plan of action to specific Healthy People objectives, baselines and targets.
  • 05
    Address social and environmental determinants in the containment plan.
  • 06
    Distinguish local findings from national ones throughout.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

1.Go to http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx and review the Healthy People 2020 initiative.Pay close attention to the objectives, goals, and indicators. 2.Using your city or county public health department or the CDC, choose 3 population or community based problems such as disease, disaster, crimes, accidents, falls etc.. from the topics outlined in the website and prepare an analysis discussing how these 3 conditions, affect your community and how they were identified and a plan of action to contained them base on healthy people 2020. 3.You can also use the following CDC link https://www.cdc.gov/outbreaks/index.html and identify 3 community infectious outbreaks such as measles and develop the assignment. The presentation must be in APA format with a minimum of 1500 words (excluding first and references page) with a minimum of 4 evidence based references using the required Arial 12 font.Must include the zip code of the city or county chosen.Follow the APA example paper that was sent to you at the beginning of the course for guidance.Make sure references are used according to APA guidelines and electronic references must be from reliable sources such as CDC. The assignment will be post it in the discussion tab of the blackboard for your peers to review and grading and in turnitin to verify originality.FNU accept only 35% of plagiarism.I will not accept any assignment that exceeds the percentage of plagiarism establish by the university. APA format, 1500 words and (excluding first and references page) minimum of 4 evidence based.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    A review of the Healthy People 2020 objectives, goals and indicators.
  2. 02
    Three population or community based problems, or three community infectious outbreaks.
  3. 03
    An analysis of how each condition affects your community.
  4. 04
    An account of how each was identified.
  5. 05
    A plan of action to contain them, based on Healthy People 2020.
  6. 06
    The zip code of the chosen city or county.
  7. 07
    A minimum of 1,500 words in APA format, Arial 12, with at least four evidence-based references.
03

Three problems, three identifications, one plan

01

Healthy People 2020 reviewed

Objectives, goals, leading health indicators and the framework's determinants emphasis.

02

The community

The city or county, its zip code, and the demographic profile that shapes its health.

03

Problem one

Local burden with figures, and how it affects this community in particular.

04

How problem one was identified

The surveillance mechanism, and what it found early or late.

05

Problem two

The same treatment for a second, genuinely different condition.

06

How problem two was identified

Its own identification pathway.

07

Problem three

A third condition with its local burden.

08

How problem three was identified

The mechanism and its limitations.

09

Plan of action

Objectives, baselines, targets, responsible parties, and how progress is measured.

10

Determinants and barriers

Transport, housing, language and access issues that would make the plan fail.

04

Local surveillance data first

Recommended databases

  • The Healthy People 2020 objectives and leading health indicators
  • Your city or county health department reports
  • CDC data portals and outbreak listings
  • County health rankings and state vital statistics

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Fix the area and its zip code first, then find what data exists at that level.
  2. 2.
    Read the Healthy People topic areas and note which have local indicators available.
  3. 3.
    If taking the outbreak route, check the CDC listings for events affecting your area.
  4. 4.
    For each problem, trace back to the surveillance system that produced the number.
  5. 5.
    Locate the baseline and target for the objectives your plan will address.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    Healthy People

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · 2025

    The framework itself, including objectives, leading health indicators and the determinants structure the plan has to sit inside.

  2. 02

    Current Outbreak List

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2025

    The source the prompt names for the alternative outbreak route, and the way to check whether your area has had a documented event.

  3. 03

    Understanding and Application of CDC Immunization Guidelines

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    For a measles or other vaccine-preventable outbreak, the coverage thresholds a containment plan has to target.

  4. 04

    Continuous Quality Improvement

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Baselines, targets and measurement cycles, which turn a plan of action into something with a stated measure of success.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Writing about national rather than local prevalence.
  • Omitting the zip code, which is a stated requirement.
  • Mixing the topic-area route and the outbreak route without choosing.
  • Skipping how each problem was identified.
  • Proposing awareness-raising instead of a measurable plan.
  • Citing Healthy People generally rather than a named objective with its baseline and target.
  • Ignoring social and environmental determinants in the plan.
  • Using news articles as evidence-based references.
  • Quoting objectives heavily and pushing the similarity score up.

Submission checklist

  • The city or county is named and its zip code is stated.
  • Local data was located before the three problems were chosen.
  • Three problems are drawn consistently from one of the two offered routes.
  • Each problem's effect on the community is supported by local figures.
  • The identification mechanism is named for each problem.
  • The plan names specific Healthy People 2020 objectives.
  • Baselines, targets and measures of success are stated.
  • Responsibility for each action is assigned.
  • Social and environmental determinants are addressed.
  • Local and national findings are distinguished.
  • At least four evidence-based references from reliable sources.
  • APA format, Arial 12, at least 1,500 words excluding title and references.

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order