NU621 Zika transmission, microcephaly and counselling
For a couple planning pregnancy after the husband travelled to Rio, describe Zika transmission routes, explain the pathophysiology by which Zika causes microcephaly, quantify their actual risk, and set out the counselling you would give.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 13, 2026
Transmission, mechanism, risk, counselling
The four questions escalate, and the third is where most posts become vague. Transmission is the easy part and should be complete: primarily by Aedes mosquito bite, but also sexually from an infected partner, vertically from mother to fetus, and by blood transfusion. The sexual route is the one this couple's situation turns on, and it persists longer in semen than the virus remains detectable in blood, which is precisely why guidance is framed as a waiting period rather than a test. The pathophysiology question wants mechanism, not association: Zika is neurotropic, infecting neural progenitor cells in the developing brain, disrupting proliferation and triggering cell death, so brain growth falls short and the skull that grows around it follows — microcephaly is the visible consequence of the underlying brain injury rather than the injury itself, and saying it that way is what distinguishes a mechanism from a description.
The risk question is the one that helps this couple, and it needs to be answered honestly and specifically. Their risk depends on whether he was actually exposed, whether current transmission was occurring in that location at that time, how long ago the travel was, and the fact that most infections are asymptomatic so the absence of illness proves little. Risk of congenital anomaly given confirmed maternal infection is well below certainty, and their risk is that figure discounted by the probability he was infected at all. The counselling should then be concrete: the recommended interval of barrier protection or abstinence before attempting conception, when testing is and is not useful, and an acknowledgement that her caution is reasonable rather than a dismissal of it. Check current guidance rather than relying on outbreak-era material, because recommendations in this area have been revised repeatedly as the evidence matured.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01State all routes of Zika transmission, including the sexual and vertical routes.
- 02Explain microcephaly as a consequence of neural progenitor cell injury.
- 03Estimate risk conditionally rather than in absolute terms.
- 04Translate a population risk figure into counselling for one couple.
- 05Recognise that guidance in a rapidly evolving area must be checked for currency.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A description of how the Zika virus is transmitted.
- 02The pathophysiology of microcephaly and how Zika causes it.
- 03The risk of microcephaly from Zika for this specific couple.
- 04The information, counselling and education you would give them, including transmission risk.
- 05Rationale with current evidence from the literature, and responses to at least two peers.
Four questions in escalating difficulty
Transmission routes
Vector, sexual, vertical and transfusion, with persistence in semen noted.
Pathophysiology of microcephaly
Neurotropism, progenitor cell infection, disrupted proliferation and apoptosis.
This couple's risk
Conditional on exposure, local transmission, timing and asymptomatic infection rates.
Counselling and education
Waiting interval, barrier use, when testing helps, and what to watch for.
Evidence and currency
Current guidance cited, with acknowledgement that recommendations have changed.
Current guidance, because this one dates fast
Recommended databases
- World Health Organization
- CDC
- MedlinePlus
- PubMed
- Course readings
Search sequence
- 1.Read the WHO Zika fact sheet for transmission routes and current risk framing.
- 2.Check the current recommended waiting interval after possible exposure before conception.
- 3.Read a source on congenital Zika syndrome for the neural mechanism.
- 4.Find the proportion of infections that are asymptomatic, for the risk section.
- 5.Confirm the publication date of every guidance document you cite.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
Zika virus
World Health Organization · 2025
Transmission routes, asymptomatic proportion and current risk guidance.
- 02
Zika Virus
MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine · 2025
Patient-facing summary useful for framing the counselling section.
- 03
Congenital disorders
World Health Organization · 2025
Microcephaly as a congenital anomaly, its causes and its consequences.
- 04
PubMed
National Library of Medicine · 2025
Primary literature on neural progenitor infection and congenital Zika syndrome risk estimates.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Listing mosquito transmission only and omitting the sexual route the case depends on.
- Describing the Zika and microcephaly link as an association without a mechanism.
- Answering the risk question with high or low instead of a conditional estimate.
- Treating absence of symptoms as evidence he was not infected.
- Dismissing the wife's concern rather than addressing it with evidence.
- Citing guidance from the outbreak period without checking whether it still stands.
Submission checklist
- All four transmission routes are named.
- Microcephaly is explained as a consequence of neural progenitor injury.
- Risk is stated conditionally, with the factors it depends on.
- Counselling includes a specific interval and the role of testing.
- Current guidance is cited, with the date checked.
- Two substantive peer responses are posted.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.
Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.