Every order is original, expert-done, and screened for AI — full report on request.See how it works

Assignment questions
PsychologyDiscussion postSocial psychology

Social influence: conformity, obedience, group processes

Conformity and obedience are not degrees of the same thing. One responds to a peer group with no power over you; the other responds to an authority that has some — and the classic studies separate them for that reason.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 15, 2026

01

Conformity and obedience are different mechanisms

Keep the two mechanisms apart, because the prompt defines them separately and most posts run them together. Conformity is horizontal: you change belief or behaviour to match peers who have no authority over you, and the classic demonstration is Asch's line-judgement task, where participants gave an answer they could see was wrong. Two motives explain it — normative influence, the wish not to be the odd one out, and informational influence, the assumption that if everyone else says so they probably know something. Obedience is vertical: you comply with someone you accept as legitimately entitled to ask, and Milgram's studies showed how far ordinary people would go under that framing. The distinction matters practically, since the interventions differ: one ally who dissents collapses conformity sharply, while obedience is reduced by proximity to the victim, distance from the authority, and the presence of a disobedient peer.

Then bring in the group processes the prompt names as the third element. Group size raises conformity but with diminishing returns; unanimity matters far more than numbers. Cohesion and identification raise it, because dissent costs more when you value the group. Deindividuation, groupthink and diffusion of responsibility all shift behaviour in ways neither conformity nor obedience alone explains, and the bystander literature is the clearest case of the last. Whatever example you build the post around, treat the classic studies critically as well as descriptively: both Asch and Milgram raise the ethical questions that produced modern review boards, both have been re-examined for how the results were reported, and both were run on narrow samples. Saying so is not a dismissal — the findings have replicated in modified forms — but a post that recounts Milgram without noting the debate reads as a summary of a textbook rather than an engagement with the field.

Likely learning objectives

Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.

  • 01
    Distinguish conformity from obedience by the source of influence.
  • 02
    Explain normative and informational influence as separate motives.
  • 03
    Identify the group-level factors that raise or lower each.
  • 04
    Evaluate the classic studies critically as well as descriptively.
Assignment instructionsQuoted verbatim

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Discussion Social Influence Discussion: Social Influence This Discussion focuses on social influence and group processes. As you likely know from your own experience, the presence of others impacts an individual’s behavior, an individual’s behavior often impacts another’s, and individuals’ behaviors often impact that of an entire group. Conformity is the tendency to change one’s beliefs or behaviors to match those of others. There are many theoretical reasons suggested by social psychologists for why people conform. Obedience is believing that a legitimate authority has the right to make a request and then adhering to this request. Social psychology studies the concept of obedience to help analyze the reasons that people disobey legitimate authority, as well as why people obey perceived authority, even when the requests go against their personal beliefs. In addition, various group processes affect whether people conform or obey in a given situation. To prepare: · Review Chapters 8 and Chapter 9 of your course text, Social Psychology, focusing on the factors that are associated with social influence on behavior. · Think about examples in the news in which people did or did not demonstrate conformity or obedience. Note: One way to find examples of news events for these concepts is to go to a major search engine (Google, Yahoo, Bing, etc.), click on the “news” tab, and type in appropriate search terms. By Day 3 Post a brief description of a contemporary example from the news in which people did or did not demonstrate conformity or obedience. Use a theory discussed in Chapter 8 to explain how or why the behavior illustrates conformity or obedience. Use information from Chapter 9 to explain how being in a group might influence behaviors in your example. That is, in your example, how might group processes, characteristics, or functions explain behavior? Notes: · Please do NOT select the Holocaust or Milgram’s studies as your example. · Support the responses within your Discussion post, and in your colleague reply, with evidence from the assigned Learning Resources. · You are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleague’s postings. After clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, select “Create Thread” to create your initial post. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Sommers, S. (2016). Social psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson. · Chapter 8, “Conformity: Influencing Behavior” · Chapter 9, “Group Processes: Influence in Social Groups” Discussion: Social Psychological Approach to Insights on Human Behavior Before you begin to explore aggression and apply concepts from social psychology to it, it is important to examine one of the most fundamental social psychological concepts: construals. A construal is defined as the way in which people perceive, comprehend, and interpret the social world. The concept of construal has its roots in Gestalt psychology—a school of psychology that stresses the importance of studying the subjective way in which an object appears in people’s minds, rather than the objective, physical attributes of the object. Social psychologists have found that two motives are of primary importance in determining human thoughts and behavior: the need to feel good about ourselves and the need to be accurate. Self-esteem is people’s evaluation of their own self-worth, or the extent to which people see themselves as good, competent, and decent. Most people have a strong need to maintain a high self-esteem. This need can clash with the need for accuracy, referred to as the social cognition motive, leading people to distort their perceptions of reality (e.g., by explaining their personal deficiencies in more positive ways) so as to preserve self-esteem. Such distortions are more “spins” on the facts rather than complete delusions. Discussion Social Influence Consider, for instance, a man who proposed marriage and had his proposal rejected in front of his girlfriend’s entire family. This person faces a conflict between the need to maintain self-esteem and the need to be accurate. What should he think about being rejected by his girlfriend? He could protect his self-esteem and assume it was not his fault at all that she said no, or he could try to get an accurate assessment of what happened (e.g., perhaps proposing in front of her family was a bad idea; perhaps his relationship was not as solid as he thought) so it will not happen again. Social psychologists study people’s subjective construals of situations and how these construals are influenced by their self-esteem and social cognition motives. An important application of this study is to better understand aggressive behavior, a social psychology topic that has far-reaching implications for individuals, groups, and society as a whole. One of the most important reasons for studying aggression is the goal of reducing violence. For example, individuals can be counseled to change the parameters of their situation, trained in communication and problem-solving skills, or provided with ongoing interventions such as anti-bullying programs. Social psychologists seek answers to questions such as: In aggressive situations, do people learn to be aggressive or is their behavior a function of their environment? Do some people have aggressive attributes and tendencies or do they become aggressive because of their unique situations? Are individuals from some cultures more aggressive than those from others? A fundamental difference between social psychologists and lay people is the application of this construal approach in understanding how aggressive situations and other types of behavior arise. Social psychologists recognize and examine the power of the situation in influencing people. Lay people often cite the situation to explain their own behaviors, but they overlook the situation and instead cite personality to explain others’ behaviors. This is termed the fundamental attribution error. For this Discussion, you consider why some individuals are aggressive toward others and how aggression escalates or can be reduced. You will compare how social psychologists and lay people might each explain various types of aggressive behavior, and in doing so, apply many of the concepts you explored in the Learning Resources this week, including construals, the fundamental attribution error, and the sometimes competing motives of self-esteem and social cognition.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation Hi Class, Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts. Contact me if you have any questions. Important information on Writing a Discussion Question Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references) There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article. Include in-text citations in your response Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information Follow APA-7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week. Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references) Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count. Follow APA 7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points. Here are some helpful links Student paper example Citing Sources The Writing Center is a great resource Welcome to class Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to. I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you. Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted. If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations. Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements. Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week. I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

02

Turn the brief into deliverables

  1. 01
    Definitions of conformity and obedience that keep them distinct.
  2. 02
    The classic evidence for each, with what it showed.
  3. 03
    Group processes affecting both, with their direction of effect.
  4. 04
    A critical note on the ethics and limits of the classic studies.
  5. 05
    APA-formatted citations.
03

Define, distinguish, then apply to the group process

01

Conformity and its motives

Define conformity and separate normative from informational influence.

02

Obedience to legitimate authority

Define obedience and describe what the classic studies demonstrated.

03

What reduces each

Contrast the interventions that lower conformity with those that lower obedience.

04

Group processes

Cover unanimity, cohesion, deindividuation, groupthink and diffusion of responsibility.

05

A critical note

Address the ethics, sampling and reporting debates around the classic studies.

04

Sources on the classic studies and their limits

Recommended databases

  • Your assigned chapters 8 and 9
  • PsycINFO
  • PubMed Central
  • APA Dictionary of Psychology

Search sequence

  1. 1.
    Fix the prompt's own definitions first, since the marking follows them.
  2. 2.
    Read a modern re-examination of Milgram alongside the original account.
  3. 3.
    Search for replication or variation studies, which show which findings held.
  4. 4.
    Look up the ethical review consequences of these studies, which is the strongest critical point available.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.

  1. 01

    APA Dictionary of Psychology

    American Psychological Association · 2024

    Reference definitions for the influence vocabulary, which is what keeps conformity and obedience distinct.

  2. 02

    Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct

    American Psychological Association · 2017

    The professional standards that grew directly out of the classic studies, which is the critical note's anchor.

  3. 03

    Research Ethics

    StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023

    Research ethics in reference form, useful for explaining why these studies could not be run today unchanged.

  4. 04

    Psychological safety in an ECMO retrieval team: a qualitative study to inform improvement

    BMJ Open Quality · 2024

    A study of psychological safety and dissent in a real team, which is conformity and obedience in a working setting.

06

Review before submission

Common mistakes

  • Using conformity and obedience interchangeably, which the prompt's own definitions rule out.
  • Describing Milgram at length without addressing the ethical and methodological debate.
  • Attributing conformity to group size when unanimity is the stronger variable.
  • Omitting group processes, which the prompt names as a third element.
  • Treating the studies as settled facts rather than as contested evidence.

Submission checklist

  • Is the horizontal-versus-vertical distinction explicit?
  • Have you named both normative and informational influence?
  • Do the group processes have a stated direction of effect?
  • Is there a critical note on the classic studies?
  • Are the assigned chapters cited?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Aaron Bishop

MA, Education

assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines

Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by

Dr. Nathan Cole

PhD, Rhetoric & Composition

Argumentation and thesis development

Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order