Why EBP is essential for the BSN-prepared RN guide
A discussion post explaining why evidence-based practice is an essential component of the practice of a BSN-prepared RN, identifying two ways you will continue to integrate evidence into your practice and encourage it in your work environment, naming the obstacles that could challenge this plan and the steps you will take to minimise their impact, supported by at least two APA sources.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 13, 2026
What does BSN preparation specifically add?
The question specifies a BSN-prepared RN rather than a nurse generally, and taking that specification seriously is what separates a strong post from a competent one. Every registered nurse is expected to practise safely and to follow policy. What baccalaureate education adds is the capacity to read and appraise research, to recognise when local practice has diverged from current evidence, and to participate in changing it — which is why the professional literature repeatedly ties BSN preparation to leadership in practice change rather than to a different clinical scope. Answer the essentialness question at that level, and you avoid the version of this post that argues evidence-based practice matters because patients deserve good care. Answering at that level also gives the post a first sentence that is not a restatement of the question, which is how most of the thread will begin. Scope of practice does not change with the degree; what changes is what you can do with a paper.
There is a second precision worth building the post around. Evidence-based practice is not the same as following a protocol, and conflating the two is the commonest conceptual error in this topic. A protocol is the output of somebody else's appraisal, frozen at the moment it was written. Evidence-based practice is the integration of the best available evidence with clinical expertise and the patient's values and circumstances, which means it can require departing from a protocol as well as following one. Stating that distinction, and giving a one-line example of a situation where the protocol and the evidence had diverged, is the single most convincing thing you can put in this post. A one-line example also protects the claim from sounding theoretical, since every experienced nurse has watched a unit follow a document that stopped matching the evidence some years earlier. Say which of the three components the divergence involved: evidence, expertise or patient values.
The two integration strategies must be things you will actually do, and the test is whether a classmate could copy them. Setting a specific recurring commitment beats an intention: a scheduled hour, a named journal or evidence alert, a specific database you will search when a clinical question arises, a journal club you will attend or start, membership of a specialty organisation whose updates arrive without you seeking them, or a commitment to bring one clinical question to your unit council each quarter. Say which two and say when. Vague strategies such as staying current or reading more are the ones that will not survive a busy month, and the difference is obvious in a marker's reading. Attaching a trigger rather than a schedule works better for some people, and saying which you chose and why shows the plan was designed rather than copied from a lecture slide.
The encouragement half of the prompt asks about your work environment and it is genuinely harder, because a newly qualified nurse has very little formal authority. What you do have is the ability to model, to ask, and to make evidence easy for other people to reach. Asking what the evidence is behind a practice, in a curious rather than a challenging tone, is a real intervention. So is bringing a one-page summary to a handover rather than a citation, since the barrier is usually access and time rather than willingness. So is finding the person on your unit who is already interested and working with them, because change spreads through relationships rather than through announcements. Making evidence easy to reach is the mechanism that works without authority, and it is the one most posts leave out in favour of a general commitment to being a role model.
The obstacles are where the post gets its credibility and the list should be honest rather than diplomatic. Time is the obstacle every study finds first: appraisal takes hours that clinical shifts do not contain. Access is the second, since paywalled journals are a real barrier once student credentials expire. Skill decays quickly if appraisal is not practised. Unit culture can be actively hostile, and the phrase about how things are done here is a genuine barrier rather than a cliché. Authority is a constraint for a new graduate, and some changes simply require someone senior. Naming four of these specifically is more useful than naming all of them briefly. Choosing four and explaining them also reads as honest, since a post naming every obstacle briefly usually turns out to have thought carefully about none of them. Skill decay is the obstacle students name least and instructors recognise most.
Each obstacle needs a proportionate step, and proportionate is the operative word. Time is addressed by scale — appraising one paper properly rather than intending to read broadly. Access is addressed by knowing the free routes: your employer's library, open-access repositories, published guidelines, and professional organisation summaries. Skill is addressed by practice with structure, such as using a critical appraisal checklist. Culture is addressed by choosing a first change that is small, visible and low-risk, since credibility has to be earned before a larger proposal will be heard. Close on which obstacle you actually expect to be hardest in your own setting, because that is the claim your classmates can answer from theirs. Sizing the step to the obstacle is also what makes the plan believable, because a mitigation larger than the barrier it addresses tends to be the first thing abandoned. Name the one you expect to bite hardest in your own setting, and the post ends on a claim.
Likely learning objectives
Inferred from the brief — check these against your own rubric.
- 01Explain the essentialness of evidence-based practice in terms specific to BSN preparation.
- 02Distinguish evidence-based practice from protocol adherence.
- 03Commit to integration strategies specific enough to be copied.
- 04Describe influence strategies available without formal authority.
- 05Match each obstacle to a proportionate mitigation step.
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Component of the practice of a BSN-prepared RN 2 Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Component of the practice of a BSN-prepared RN 2
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01A discussion of why EBP is an essential component of the practice of a BSN-prepared RN.
- 02Two ways you will continue to integrate evidence into your practice.
- 03How you will encourage evidence-based practice within your work environment.
- 04The obstacles that could challenge this plan.
- 05The steps you will take to minimise their impact.
- 06At least two APA sources supporting your answers.
Two strategies, four obstacles, proportionate steps
Why it is essential at BSN level
Tie the argument to appraisal capability and participation in practice change rather than to general care quality.
Protocol is not evidence
Define evidence-based practice as evidence plus expertise plus patient values, and give a divergence example.
Integration strategy one
A named, scheduled, repeatable commitment with a trigger.
Integration strategy two
A second strategy that works differently from the first, such as membership or a journal club.
Encouraging others without authority
Modelling, curious questions, one-page summaries, and finding an ally already interested.
Name four obstacles
Time, access, skill decay, culture and authority — choose four and explain each.
Proportionate steps
Scale, free access routes, structured appraisal practice, and a small first change.
Free routes to evidence after graduation
Recommended databases
- CINAHL
- PubMed
- Cochrane Library
- Professional organisation practice resources
Search sequence
- 1.Search for studies of barriers to evidence-based practice among registered nurses, which give you the obstacle list with evidence attached.
- 2.Look for competency statements tying baccalaureate preparation to evidence appraisal.
- 3.Find at least one study on the effect of journal clubs or evidence champions on unit practice.
- 4.Identify which free evidence routes are actually available to you after graduation and note them.
- 5.Check whether your employer provides library access, since this determines which access strategy is realistic.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nothing here is cleared for citation until you have read it.
- 01
AACN Essentials
American Association of Colleges of Nursing · 2021
Competency expectations tying baccalaureate education to evidence appraisal and translation; the basis of the essentialness argument.
- 02
| Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · 2025
Free evidence syntheses and implementation tools; a concrete answer to the access obstacle.
- 03
Clinical Reasoning, Decisionmaking, and Action: Thinking Critically and Clinically
Patient Safety and Quality, NCBI Bookshelf · 2008
Supports the argument that clinical expertise is a component of evidence-based practice rather than an alternative to it.
- 04
The Future of Nursing
Institute of Medicine, NCBI Bookshelf · 2011
Evidence on nurses leading practice change, which underpins the encouragement half of the answer.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Arguing that evidence-based practice matters because patients deserve good care.
- Treating protocol adherence as equivalent to evidence-based practice.
- Offering integration strategies too vague to be acted on.
- Ignoring the limited formal authority a new graduate actually has.
- Listing obstacles without matching each to a step.
- Omitting the access problem that appears when student database credentials expire.
Submission checklist
- The answer is specific to what baccalaureate preparation adds.
- Evidence-based practice is distinguished from protocol following, with an example.
- Two integration strategies are named, each with a frequency or a trigger.
- At least two encouragement strategies are available without formal authority.
- Four obstacles are named specifically, including time and access.
- Each obstacle has a proportionate mitigation step.
- Two APA sources are cited in text as well as listed.
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read our academic-integrity policy.

Written by
Aaron Bishop
MA, Education
assignment interpretation and research-methods coaching across disciplines
Aaron leads the EssayCrackers editorial desk. He works on how assignment briefs are read — what a rubric is actually asking for, and where students most often answer a different question than the one set.

Reviewed by
Dr. Nathan Cole
PhD, Rhetoric & Composition
Argumentation and thesis development
Nathan teaches first-year composition and directs a university writing center. He reviews EssayCrackers guides for argumentative soundness and citation accuracy.